Bleeding Green wrote:Eh, he's a better Robert Williams. I can get those players outside the lottery.
Yeah. Alot better robert williams.
Bigger, longer, more athletic, higher iq, durable, has the makings of a 3point shot, has post up moves.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Bleeding Green wrote:Eh, he's a better Robert Williams. I can get those players outside the lottery.

Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.

Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
Bleeding Green wrote:Let me rephrase. He's a slightly better Nerlens Noel/Clint Capela/Mitch Robinson/insert other tall athletic guy who I don't want handling the ball or getting in the way of my wings. Maybe.

Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
Bleeding Green wrote:Maybe. I just don't value his archetype at all. It's a 20-25 minutes per game kind of player and I don't want him on the floor when the game matters. I don't think having a high usage big is valuable.
100proof wrote:Bleeding Green wrote:Eh, he's a better Robert Williams. I can get those players outside the lottery.
Yeah. Alot better robert williams.
Bigger, longer, more athletic, higher iq, durable, has the makings of a 3point shot, has post up moves.
big-shot-ROB wrote:Wiseman defense is far to inconsistent. He has no chance of staying in front of switches. Gobert-lite is out of his stratosphere even with his ceiling outcome. And AD, LOL. AD has one of the craziest touch and body agility&coordination we've seen on a big, Wiseman is not really close to that.
Wiseman outcome likely looks at the production Ayton will produce.
Curmudgeon wrote:Why are we discussing Wiseman? The Celtics' chances of getting him are around .0001 percent.

Celtics_History_Lesson wrote:Disinformation wrote:100proof wrote:
Ah doing account audits today, brain is not in a joking mood I guess. lol
It probably wasn't a very good joke.
Those are always good jokes.
The minor problem was you went with "Thon Maker's son".
Grandson would have been more believable.
17, 23, 30, 45, 53, could be many picks for a draft with not a lot of good, especially where Celtics need it.
Will suggest Gonzaga and Arizona have some of the more useful prospects, considering what the Celtics need.
You can get an athletic power forward from one of them and an outside shooting power forward from the other.
[b]Celtics have no NBA-size power forwards on the current roster.[/b]

Curmudgeon wrote:Why are we discussing Wiseman? The Celtics' chances of getting him are around .0001 percent.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
100proof wrote:Wouldnt pick wiseman unless he is at 25 or something?
That crazy talk
Someone with young dwight howard athletic abilty, strength and defensive upside coupled with low post offense and a jumper with very good form translateable out to 3pt line.
Exactly the rype of center this team could use.
Everything we all like about theis, wiseman has better.

100proof wrote:Wouldnt pick wiseman unless he is at 25 or something?
That crazy talk
Someone with young dwight howard athletic abilty, strength and defensive upside coupled with low post offense and a jumper with very good form translateable out to 3pt line.
Exactly the rype of center this team could use.
Everything we all like about theis, wiseman has better.
Manocad wrote:I have an engineering degree, an exceptionally high IQ, and can point to the exact location/area of any country on an unlabeled globe.
Bleeding Green wrote:100proof wrote:Wouldnt pick wiseman unless he is at 25 or something?
That crazy talk
Someone with young dwight howard athletic abilty, strength and defensive upside coupled with low post offense and a jumper with very good form translateable out to 3pt line.
Exactly the rype of center this team could use.
Everything we all like about theis, wiseman has better.
Like I said I loathe this type of player and put zero value on it. He's played like 100 minutes of NCAA basketball and looks very stiff in his hips, poor hands, does he have any post moves besides just being taller and longer than his competition. I don't like players like this. If you get him in the top-5 you grossly overpaid; if you get him at 20 and use him as a 20-25 mpg rimrunner who gets the **** out of the way of the real offensive players, great. But if you draft him top-5, you are basically saying that you want to forcefeed him touches. Get centers who post up out of the god damn league, please.
Of course he's not falling to 25, teams took DeAndre Ayton and Marvin Bagley over Luka Doncic; teams are inept as ****, especially the ones who find themselves in the lottery every year. But for me, I don't value a guy like Wiseman at all. Maybe Vlade Divac does or whoever is in charge for the Suns or Hawks. They sure have been killing it, one of these teams will win 40 games this decade I can just feel it.
But like you guys say, I haven't seen him much, haven't scouted his high school recruiting games like you, and I've seen none of the AAU tape. I've just seen the highlights and the first Memphis game this year. He's soft, has no post moves, has he ever made a pass? Took jumpers (??) from the perimeter when he had tiny guards on him.