Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
Moderators: Cowology, Snakebites, theBigLip, dVs33
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,137
- And1: 1,678
- Joined: Jun 25, 2013
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
It's much better to just consolidate all of the bad contracts that we have to get through up front. We are going to be bad anyways; so we might as well be a little worse.
Otherwise even if we are better off we will still be somewhat limited trying to pay off old debts...
Otherwise even if we are better off we will still be somewhat limited trying to pay off old debts...
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
- Uncle Mxy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,105
- And1: 1,943
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
- Location: I plead the Fifth Dimension
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
Will stretching Blake help him recover from his injuries quicker, or will it just turn him into a useless 7' player like Maker?
And "nuclear" stretching? That seems SO 20th century. How about "quantum stretching"? That's more buzzword-compliant.
And "nuclear" stretching? That seems SO 20th century. How about "quantum stretching"? That's more buzzword-compliant.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,436
- And1: 617
- Joined: Jun 30, 2011
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
just keep him hope he gets healthy, puts on a solid numbers and a team like the knicks trades for him lol.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
- pistonsbball
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,527
- And1: 1,543
- Joined: Jul 04, 2012
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
No need to stretch, cap space means nothing for us for the next few seasons.
I'd definitely be looking to limit Blake to around 25 minutes a game. You'd rather a couple of seasons of decent production from those minutes than one good season and for him to break down again. He should work with Wood in theory, but I'm not sure it's gonna happen like that. I can see him clogging the lane, slowing down the offense and denying Wood touches, slowing his development.
I'd definitely be looking to limit Blake to around 25 minutes a game. You'd rather a couple of seasons of decent production from those minutes than one good season and for him to break down again. He should work with Wood in theory, but I'm not sure it's gonna happen like that. I can see him clogging the lane, slowing down the offense and denying Wood touches, slowing his development.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,624
- And1: 1,350
- Joined: Jan 19, 2002
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
No, take that bitter draught in one gulp and get it over with.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,698
- And1: 476
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
- Location: Michigan
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
It’s a bad idea unless there an trade proposal that would require it.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 47,392
- And1: 11,599
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,824
- And1: 8,045
- Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
The only way that stretching him would make sense is if you could use that $17 million of cap space you'd gain this year to get some great assets. If you could get a good young player or two and some 1st rounders it might be worth considering. If have a chance to get some great assets I think you could go for it. If not, it hurts you for four years so its not worth doing.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,147
- And1: 468
- Joined: Apr 17, 2016
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
BadMofoPimp wrote:Allan Houston type buyout!!!
At which point Gores will give Griffin $75 million to go away, even though the Pistons are rebuilding and don't need the cap space? I doubt it.
That would be by far the most expensive contract buyout in NBA history. Gilbert Arenas holds the current record at less than half that amount.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,137
- And1: 1,678
- Joined: Jun 25, 2013
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
I am the definition of insanity.
I keep coming back here by habit and keep seeing the same 4 or 5 threads being 'resurrected' by replies; even though there is no new content presented and the opinions expressed are basically the same. There's no logical reason to expect new topics because there's no news.
I'm guilty of it myself. I *want* there to be something to talk about. I think I'm not the only one?
Sorry for the ramble. Just thought it was funny
I keep coming back here by habit and keep seeing the same 4 or 5 threads being 'resurrected' by replies; even though there is no new content presented and the opinions expressed are basically the same. There's no logical reason to expect new topics because there's no news.
I'm guilty of it myself. I *want* there to be something to talk about. I think I'm not the only one?
Sorry for the ramble. Just thought it was funny
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 47,392
- And1: 11,599
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
bstein14 wrote:The only way that stretching him would make sense is if you could use that $17 million of cap space you'd gain this year to get some great assets. If you could get a good young player or two and some 1st rounders it might be worth considering. If have a chance to get some great assets I think you could go for it. If not, it hurts you for four years so its not worth doing.
Unless, the plan is to lose as many games for pics as possible for 2 years maybe.
Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,698
- And1: 476
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
- Location: Michigan
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
Invictus88 wrote:I am the definition of insanity.
I keep coming back here by habit and keep seeing the same 4 or 5 threads being 'resurrected' by replies; even though there is no new content presented and the opinions expressed are basically the same. There's no logical reason to expect new topics because there's no news.
I'm guilty of it myself. I *want* there to be something to talk about. I think I'm not the only one?
Sorry for the ramble. Just thought it was funny
This issue is life without sports. It sucks just being forced to wait for the lotto.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
- Manocad
- RealGM
- Posts: 69,969
- And1: 10,561
- Joined: Dec 13, 2005
- Location: Middle Fingerton
- Contact:
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
DetroitDon15 wrote:Invictus88 wrote:I am the definition of insanity.
I keep coming back here by habit and keep seeing the same 4 or 5 threads being 'resurrected' by replies; even though there is no new content presented and the opinions expressed are basically the same. There's no logical reason to expect new topics because there's no news.
I'm guilty of it myself. I *want* there to be something to talk about. I think I'm not the only one?
Sorry for the ramble. Just thought it was funny
This issue is life without sports. It sucks just being forced to wait for the lotto.
I'm actually surprised at how little I've missed it, and I'm a big sports fan. It's just that the Pistons, Tigers and Wings were all so bad that it was a struggle to watch the games and get much entertainment out of it. My brain has already moved on to football.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,698
- And1: 476
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
- Location: Michigan
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
Manocad wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:Invictus88 wrote:I am the definition of insanity.
I keep coming back here by habit and keep seeing the same 4 or 5 threads being 'resurrected' by replies; even though there is no new content presented and the opinions expressed are basically the same. There's no logical reason to expect new topics because there's no news.
I'm guilty of it myself. I *want* there to be something to talk about. I think I'm not the only one?
Sorry for the ramble. Just thought it was funny
This issue is life without sports. It sucks just being forced to wait for the lotto.
I'm actually surprised at how little I've missed it, and I'm a big sports fan. It's just that the Pistons, Tigers and Wings were all so bad that it was a struggle to watch the games and get much entertainment out of it. My brain has already moved on to football.
I’m done with the hockey/basketball season. I kinda want a little baseball despite the Tigers being garbage.
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 47,392
- And1: 11,599
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
Manocad wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:Invictus88 wrote:I am the definition of insanity.
I keep coming back here by habit and keep seeing the same 4 or 5 threads being 'resurrected' by replies; even though there is no new content presented and the opinions expressed are basically the same. There's no logical reason to expect new topics because there's no news.
I'm guilty of it myself. I *want* there to be something to talk about. I think I'm not the only one?
Sorry for the ramble. Just thought it was funny
This issue is life without sports. It sucks just being forced to wait for the lotto.
I'm actually surprised at how little I've missed it, and I'm a big sports fan. It's just that the Pistons, Tigers and Wings were all so bad that it was a struggle to watch the games and get much entertainment out of it. My brain has already moved on to football.
How about them Lions?
Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,698
- And1: 476
- Joined: Jul 23, 2002
- Location: Michigan
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
BadMofoPimp wrote:Manocad wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:
This issue is life without sports. It sucks just being forced to wait for the lotto.
I'm actually surprised at how little I've missed it, and I'm a big sports fan. It's just that the Pistons, Tigers and Wings were all so bad that it was a struggle to watch the games and get much entertainment out of it. My brain has already moved on to football.
How about them Lions?
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,137
- And1: 1,678
- Joined: Jun 25, 2013
Re: Nuclear Option: Stretching Blake Griffin
BadMofoPimp wrote:Manocad wrote:DetroitDon15 wrote:
This issue is life without sports. It sucks just being forced to wait for the lotto.
I'm actually surprised at how little I've missed it, and I'm a big sports fan. It's just that the Pistons, Tigers and Wings were all so bad that it was a struggle to watch the games and get much entertainment out of it. My brain has already moved on to football.
How about them Lions?
Yeah... everything kind of made sense in this thread until BMP brought things back to reality