WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,272
- And1: 1,516
- Joined: Mar 15, 2017
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
and the episode was also good because HHH took part!
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- Stanford
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 52,104
- And1: 16,808
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
But yeah that Cena promo rocked
He had me thinking, "damn, all promos should be done in an empty arena."
He had me thinking, "damn, all promos should be done in an empty arena."
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Stanford wrote:But yeah that Cena promo rocked
He had me thinking, "damn, all promos should be done in an empty arena."
If WWE keeps alienating their fans, someday they will be.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- Stanford
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 52,104
- And1: 16,808
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Hilarious Cesaro quote from tonight:
"If you would have told me 10 years ago that I would wrestle Daniel Bryan in front of nobody... I would have believed you"
"If you would have told me 10 years ago that I would wrestle Daniel Bryan in front of nobody... I would have believed you"
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,441
- And1: 2,945
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Cena/Wyatt should definitely be for the title and should be main eventing mania. Stupid stupid decision to put it on Goldberg.
Goldberg/Reigns, cool and all. It sells... But c'mon.
Goldberg/Reigns, cool and all. It sells... But c'mon.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,272
- And1: 1,516
- Joined: Mar 15, 2017
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Will be there always matches from old ppvs?
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,421
- And1: 3,290
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Smackdown wasn’t bad.
Gronk’s entrance and promo was actually good/entertaining. Hard to say how he would’ve been received if fans were there, but I thought he did well.
Miz/Morrison vs Heavy Machinery was a solid match. Ziggler on commentary was interesting and helped continue his feud with Otis.
Bayley/Sasha, Paige segment was okay — a little awkward.
Nothing against Roman, I actually like him as a person and think he’s good in the ring... but his promo skills.. ugh, it’s hard to believe how minimally he’s improved after years of being the top guy.
Gronk’s entrance and promo was actually good/entertaining. Hard to say how he would’ve been received if fans were there, but I thought he did well.
Miz/Morrison vs Heavy Machinery was a solid match. Ziggler on commentary was interesting and helped continue his feud with Otis.
Bayley/Sasha, Paige segment was okay — a little awkward.
Nothing against Roman, I actually like him as a person and think he’s good in the ring... but his promo skills.. ugh, it’s hard to believe how minimally he’s improved after years of being the top guy.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,628
- And1: 2,923
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Anyone seen DBs tweets? Please please please give us a stable with Bryan, Gulak, and Gable!
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,993
- And1: 7,272
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
The best part of live crowds eventually returning will be the universal disdain for Gronk.
Do it for Chuck
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,054
- And1: 903
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Goldberg vs Roman is a already a snoozefest.
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,628
- And1: 2,923
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Anyone else sensing the Funhouse match to be similar to a Final Deletion one where some segments will be pre-recorded?
Hoping for a part where the Dr. Of Thuganomics returns
Hoping for a part where the Dr. Of Thuganomics returns
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
tugs wrote:Anyone else sensing the Funhouse match to be similar to a Final Deletion one where some segments will be pre-recorded?
Hoping for a part where the Dr. Of Thuganomics returns
Unfortunately, given that it's WWE, it'll probably end up a lot more like that godawful House of Horrors match between Wyatt and Orton.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,441
- And1: 2,945
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Vince is gonna love Jaxson Ryker isn't he?
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,441
- And1: 2,945
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
I already love the Strowman/Wyatt storyline. Hope it has a long build to it. Have Braun and Bray (not The Fiend) team up again and win the tag titles. Keep The Fiend off TV for a while, especially now with no fans in attendance. Save the next Fiend appearance for when there's fans.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,432
- And1: 62,604
- Joined: May 04, 2015
- Location: T-Dot
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- WRau1
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,925
- And1: 5,144
- Joined: Apr 30, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Daniel Bryan v Cesaro last night was very good.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,054
- And1: 903
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
WRau1 wrote:Daniel Bryan v Cesaro last night was very good.
Cesaro should've won though.
I don't want to see DB in a brutal ladder match.
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- WRau1
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,925
- And1: 5,144
- Joined: Apr 30, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
The_Brecht wrote:WRau1 wrote:Daniel Bryan v Cesaro last night was very good.
Cesaro should've won though.
I don't want to see DB in a brutal ladder match.
It's not really a traditional ladder match and it won't be live. I'm guessing that this type of a situation is actually increasing DB's longevity, where they can plan everything out, take all the time they need and take all the precautions in the world while still getting the perfect take.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,441
- And1: 2,945
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Per Wikipedia, Kofi is a 9x tag champion. Big E is a 8x tag champion. And Xavier Woods is a 7x tag champion. How did that happen?
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
iMoreland wrote:Per Wikipedia, Kofi is a 9x tag champion. Big E is a 8x tag champion. And Xavier Woods is a 7x tag champion. How did that happen?
Basically if you were even remotely relevant in WWE the past decade you've probably had at least half a dozen title reigns.