K-DOT wrote:My thing about taking Wiseman is, how many good teams are built offensively around dominant bigs?
You have the Nuggets, the Sixers, and arguably the Pacers and Magic (who I'm really stretching the definition of "good" here), and that's it.
Even with guys like KAT and AD, it's been really a struggle for teams to build consistent good teams around them
So for me, I think it'd be better for us to roll with Mitch and use our pick on a good wing/guard prospect. The issue, of course, being that there really isn't a great prospect in this draft. Maybe Anthony Edwards, or LaMelo if you're really high on him, but I think Wiseman is clearly BPA
I'd take Edwards over Wiseman, but that's about it. If nobody offers a godfather deal, just take Wiseman then
I think your analysis on bigs in the NBA is spot on but I'm kinda surprised the only wing/guard you like better than Wiseman is Edwards. Is it because you just don't like LaMelo and Hayes or you're just higher on Wiseman?
I keep seeing Wiseman NBA comparison as DeAndre Jordan but not really a super athlete. So what is he going to give us, that we don't already have in Mitch? Maybe a post game? I don't think there's any signs that he's can shoot threes. I'd rather throw some money at Christian Woods instead.
The only big that is really leading his team anywhere is Jokic and he's as unique of a big man the NBA has ever seen. Even as good as Embiid is he's not really the guy that's going to get you a bucket down the stretch of a game.



































