ImageImageImageImageImage

OT: Democratic Primary Thread

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Who are you voting for?

Poll ended at Sat Mar 14, 2020 11:48 pm

Joe Biden - I have no idea why, and I also forgot what year it is
18
28%
Bernie Sanders - I am an intelligent human being, and understand Sanders is our last hope and America needs him
38
58%
Tulsi Gabbard (Dropped Out) - Ringo Starr is also my favorite Beatle
9
14%
 
Total votes: 65

Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#361 » by Knickfan1982 » Sat Mar 21, 2020 5:28 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:

I don't know how anyone can flame a pragmatist for encouraging this, but that's what we're seeing on this board. A whole lot of disrespect for those who espouse compromise and strategy as the way forwards. It has nothing to do with being less invested in progressive beliefs, but everything to do with getting something actually done.

The priority has to be to push out the white nationalists and their enablers. Fail at that and every other idea will get scuttled anyway.



I was debating a Trump loving friend of mines about healthcare and he was all "You want socialized medicine but look at what's happening right now in Italy during the coronavirus. Deaths. Overwhelmed and undersupplied hospitals etc". I responded by pointing out that we are very lucky Italy got hit before we did and we had time to prepare. Its only the first inning here so I wouldn't strut as if we had this thing conquered. Then during the debate with Bernie that Sunday Joe Biden made essentially the same argument my Trump supporting friend made.

I am ok with compromise. I am not ok with Biden and other Democrats echoing Republican talking points when attacking progressives. I think this is going to destroy the Democratic parties chances of winning the election. Why? Because these attacks from their own party discourage progressives. It discourages young voters. We are unplugging the energy the party needs to move forward. I think this is why Bernie failed to drive turnout the way he hoped and why his campaign quickly collapsed in the face of a united Democratic establishment. I am worried that the very voters we need to propel this party forward are tired of fighting on two fronts and are pulling away rather than pushing forward with us.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#362 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Mar 21, 2020 5:48 pm

Knickfan1982 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:

I don't know how anyone can flame a pragmatist for encouraging this, but that's what we're seeing on this board. A whole lot of disrespect for those who espouse compromise and strategy as the way forwards. It has nothing to do with being less invested in progressive beliefs, but everything to do with getting something actually done.

The priority has to be to push out the white nationalists and their enablers. Fail at that and every other idea will get scuttled anyway.



I was debating a Trump loving friend of mines about healthcare and he was all "You want socialized medicine but look at what's happening right now in Italy during the coronavirus. Deaths. Overwhelmed and undersupplied hospitals etc". I responded by pointing out that we are very lucky Italy got hit before we did and we had time to prepare. Its only the first inning here so I wouldn't strut as if we had this thing conquered. Then during the debate with Bernie that Sunday Joe Biden made essentially the same argument my Trump supporting friend made.

I am ok with compromise. I am not ok with Biden and other Democrats echoing Republican talking points when attacking progressives. I think this is going to destroy the Democratic parties chances of winning the election. Why? Because these attacks from their own party discourage progressives. It discourages young voters. We are unplugging the energy the party needs to move forward. I think this is why Bernie failed to drive turnout the way he hoped and why his campaign quickly collapsed in the face of a united Democratic establishment. I am worried that the very voters we need to propel this party forward are tired of fighting on two fronts and are pulling away rather than pushing forward with us.


Yes, that attack energy has gone both ways so the ability to coalesce does require it to be tempered and redirected or there won't be enough unity to pull through. The beliefs of each faction still has to communicate enough to find common ground. The knock against Bernie's supporters has been largely due to anger overwhelming the ability to connect. Fail to connect with those who don't wholly agree with you and you are guaranteed to fail.

This is not a winner takes all situation and Bernie probably encouraged zero sum thinking to the extent it created a bubble around him and his movement that does not produce victory in the polls. You have to build more bridges to win. The middle is not palatable to the left by inclination, but it is where you draw from to grow from your base.

And to be even-handed about it, I do think moderates can be contemptuous of Sanders voters and unnecessarily so. But there is still room to meet them somewhere between left and center if you want it. Because the stridency is more likely to happen the further out you get to the ideological edge (which can be seen on both the right and left of the spectrum), it actually requires more of an emotional adjustment from the hard left than from the center, because it is just human nature for moderate people to recoil from the visceral energy of righteous followers of any path. It is basic psychology, but it bears repeating I think.

And as far as the virus and Italian comparisons are concerned, the current trajectory in the USA far exceeds any prior outbreak, including China and Italy. It means within 2-3 weeks we will have the most cases, deaths and the biggest crisis of any country. That's why anybody who says Trump has regained their footing should hold their tongue, because that is not what the numbers are showing. Containment has failed and now it is up to each state to fend for themselves until there is a collective drop in cases which is inevitable.

We could have nipped this in the bud. It doesn't matter if China lied. Our intelligence community was pounding the tables two months ago and our "leadership" called it a hoax to push their infantile political fantasies instead of getting ready. We could have shut down for a month and be largely done with this and resume our business if our government had tests ready and could then determine who needs quarantine and health care down to every last person in this country. But Trump still resists federal aid or using wartime powers to requisition factory capacity for needed supplies. It's a joke and the political fall-out has not even begun to manifest. This is going to be apocalyptic for the GOP and I find comments that Trump will get re-elected laughable. No, he won't unless we eff this all up by treating each other as warring factions within the Democratic party.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,202
And1: 24,502
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#363 » by Pointgod » Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:26 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
Knicks4eva2020 wrote:I always get this response from people who have never even touched down on scandinavian countries. I've lived in stockholm. I don't want to be sweden. The US could never be sweden. We are a melting pot.

You can't compare two countries with no similarities together and say see "it works there". Because unless you didn't realize culturally in sweden its always about the team. If you do project and boast about I did this they look at you weird. Just culturally speaking. That is the opposite of here.


Just to play devil's advocate but that whole "you can't compare two countries with no similarities together and say see it works there" and change it to see "it didn't work there" wherever socialism failed. That doesn't stop people capitalists from bringing up Venezuela every since time socialism is discussed.


It is probably better to use the term Democratic Socialism when referring to policies most of us would like to see and when referring to the Scandinavian countries.

As a person with close family ties to Sweden, I can say he was entirely correct about the cultural differences being of huge consequence. Sweden began educational reforms about a century ago that raised the education level of the population as a whole and part of that curriculum was instilling in people from an early age the need to sacrifice for the common good. It was a homogenous population then. It is less so now, but that remains the dominant cultural ethics. Variants on this ethos is found in Denmark next door and other close by nations.

Support of community and family is how those countries function and it manifests in the workplace. Not every situation is harmonious because of inevitable human conflicts, but on the whole people know how to get along better there and self-aggrandizement is not really present in their culture. Now, they are not fully socialist countries, just democratic socialists and even they have challenges to keep the social fabric there now.

Just getting started here what a country like Sweden started a hundred years ago is more than a fractured, selfish culture like America can handle in one swallow. You do need to move progressive agendas through mud here, because our culture is not adapted to self-sacrifice any longer. We rallied during WWII, but whatever unity was found then is long gone now.

Their point was spot on about the cultural differences and why you can't graft one social experiment on to another. Cultural DNA predicates how you approach these agendas. No idea gets implemented solely due to its intellectual or moral validity alone. It has to go through a complex political strainer and come out the other end. America is a mess which makes it more tempting to grab on to holistic visions, so I can appreciate that desire, but the more messier situation is the more patience and strategy you need to navigate the path of change. All or nothing is not a strategy for success in American politics. You have to build coalitions or you condemn yourself to another generation howling in the wilderness.


Wow this is spot on! I was going to type out the same thing almost word for word. Americans are too selfish and individualistic to implement a huge shift in Democratic Socialist policies, that’s why you have to go slow. Americans in general are more Conservative than the media and twitter would have you believe. It’s a good thing Republicans haven’t figured that if they stopped being racist they’d have a lock down on politics for decades.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#364 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:42 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
Just to play devil's advocate but that whole "you can't compare two countries with no similarities together and say see it works there" and change it to see "it didn't work there" wherever socialism failed. That doesn't stop people capitalists from bringing up Venezuela every since time socialism is discussed.


It is probably better to use the term Democratic Socialism when referring to policies most of us would like to see and when referring to the Scandinavian countries.

As a person with close family ties to Sweden, I can say he was entirely correct about the cultural differences being of huge consequence. Sweden began educational reforms about a century ago that raised the education level of the population as a whole and part of that curriculum was instilling in people from an early age the need to sacrifice for the common good. It was a homogenous population then. It is less so now, but that remains the dominant cultural ethics. Variants on this ethos is found in Denmark next door and other close by nations.

Support of community and family is how those countries function and it manifests in the workplace. Not every situation is harmonious because of inevitable human conflicts, but on the whole people know how to get along better there and self-aggrandizement is not really present in their culture. Now, they are not fully socialist countries, just democratic socialists and even they have challenges to keep the social fabric there now.

Just getting started here what a country like Sweden started a hundred years ago is more than a fractured, selfish culture like America can handle in one swallow. You do need to move progressive agendas through mud here, because our culture is not adapted to self-sacrifice any longer. We rallied during WWII, but whatever unity was found then is long gone now.

Their point was spot on about the cultural differences and why you can't graft one social experiment on to another. Cultural DNA predicates how you approach these agendas. No idea gets implemented solely due to its intellectual or moral validity alone. It has to go through a complex political strainer and come out the other end. America is a mess which makes it more tempting to grab on to holistic visions, so I can appreciate that desire, but the more messier situation is the more patience and strategy you need to navigate the path of change. All or nothing is not a strategy for success in American politics. You have to build coalitions or you condemn yourself to another generation howling in the wilderness.


Wow this is spot on! I was going to type out the same thing almost word for word. Americans are too selfish and individualistic to implement a huge shift in Democratic Socialist policies, that’s why you have to go slow. Americans in general are more Conservative than the media and twitter would have you believe. It’s a good thing Republicans haven’t figured that if they stopped being racist they’d have a lock down on politics for decades.


In Scandinavia, you're also more likely to see people from different generations making common cause politically, because there are political factions there and you still have to pick sides. White nationalists are a real threat there too.

My oldest cousin was a firebrand socialist leading strikes at the Volvo factory back in the early 70s. He's a doctor now. Just had his hip replaced. He figured out how to make it work for himself.

In general, respect your elders is a phrase that is more likely to be acted out over there than here. It is given lip service here, but outside of considerations of immediate family, many Americans have little interest in learning from the life experience of others. That's not a uniform fact, but the fairly common reality of our social ethos.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#365 » by HarthorneWingo » Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:50 pm

Where's Hiding Joe Biden? Bernie has raised over $2 million of the virus and is out there everyday holding rallies and fighting against this virus. Where's Joe's leadership?



Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#366 » by Knickfan1982 » Sat Mar 21, 2020 7:48 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:

This is not a winner takes all situation and Bernie probably encouraged zero sum thinking to the extent it created a bubble around him and his movement that does not produce victory in the polls. You have to build more bridges to win. The middle is not palatable to the left by inclination, but it is where you draw from to grow from your base.


A couple points of disagreement. Firstly, you don't grow your base from the middle. Right now the Democratic base is the middle. If we want to grow from our base we need to give voters who don't vote frequently a reason to come out. Half hearted policies and attacking policies that would genuinely propel change won't do that.

Secondly, it is a winner takes all situation. The problems we are facing are massive. For instance, if you think Climate Change is a real and imminent threat then half-hearted solutions aren't going to be enough. We all lose at that point.

We could have nipped this in the bud. It doesn't matter if China lied. Our intelligence community was pounding the tables two months ago and our "leadership" called it a hoax to push their infantile political fantasies instead of getting ready. We could have shut down for a month and be largely done with this and resume our business if our government had tests ready and could then determine who needs quarantine and health care down to every last person in this country. But Trump still resists federal aid or using wartime powers to requisition factory capacity for needed supplies. It's a joke and the political fall-out has not even begun to manifest. This is going to be apocalyptic for the GOP and I find comments that Trump will get re-elected laughable. No, he won't unless we eff this all up by treating each other as warring factions within the Democratic party.


Comments that Trump will get re-elected are not laughable. It was laughable that a person like Donald Trump could win the Republican nomination let alone win the election right up until it actually happened. Facts don't matter to Trump's Republican party. Its a cult of personality. They are all in on him. Most Democrats are begrudgingly settling on Biden. Voting against the other guy isn't enough you need to give people a reason to vote for you. Trump has done so on his end. Biden hasn't and I don't think he's capable of it. If he was he wouldn't be running for President for the 3rd time.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#367 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:00 pm

Knickfan1982 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:

This is not a winner takes all situation and Bernie probably encouraged zero sum thinking to the extent it created a bubble around him and his movement that does not produce victory in the polls. You have to build more bridges to win. The middle is not palatable to the left by inclination, but it is where you draw from to grow from your base.


A couple points of disagreement. Firstly, you don't grow your base from the middle. Right now the Democratic base is the middle. If we want to grow from our base we need to give voters who don't vote frequently a reason to come out. Half hearted policies and attacking policies that would genuinely propel change won't do that.

Secondly, it is a winner takes all situation. The problems we are facing are massive. For instance, if you think Climate Change is a real and imminent threat then half-hearted solutions aren't going to be enough. We all lose at that point.

We could have nipped this in the bud. It doesn't matter if China lied. Our intelligence community was pounding the tables two months ago and our "leadership" called it a hoax to push their infantile political fantasies instead of getting ready. We could have shut down for a month and be largely done with this and resume our business if our government had tests ready and could then determine who needs quarantine and health care down to every last person in this country. But Trump still resists federal aid or using wartime powers to requisition factory capacity for needed supplies. It's a joke and the political fall-out has not even begun to manifest. This is going to be apocalyptic for the GOP and I find comments that Trump will get re-elected laughable. No, he won't unless we eff this all up by treating each other as warring factions within the Democratic party.


Comments that Trump will get re-elected are not laughable. It was laughable that a person like Donald Trump could win the Republican nomination let alone win the election right up until it actually happened. Facts don't matter to Trump's Republican party. Its a cult of personality. They are all in on him. Most Democrats are begrudgingly settling on Biden. Voting against the other guy isn't enough you need to give people a reason to vote for you. Trump has done so on his end. Biden hasn't and I don't think he's capable of it. If he was he wouldn't be running for President for the 3rd time.


Perhaps you misread my intended point. I meant the left needs to attract voters from the middle, not that they should view the middle as their foundational starting point in terms of policy objectives. However you phrase it or conceptualize it, there has to be a meeting somewhere along that spectrum that accommodates more than one set of views.

As far as the semantics of "winner takes all" that was intended as a comment on factionalism within the party.

This election is a winner takes all election though. You lose to the GOP, that may be a death sentence for the planet right there.

As there is no other alternative besides electing the D nominee, the urgency of the issues does require us to push that to the forefront of the D party ASAP.

Per the election, it is laughable to me in the sense that some people think Trump is a lock to get re-elected. You're right, there are no guarantees for either outcome. I agree that we can't minimize that he could get re-elected if we don't mobilize and get out the vote.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,202
And1: 24,502
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#368 » by Pointgod » Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:42 pm

Knickfan1982 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:

I don't know how anyone can flame a pragmatist for encouraging this, but that's what we're seeing on this board. A whole lot of disrespect for those who espouse compromise and strategy as the way forwards. It has nothing to do with being less invested in progressive beliefs, but everything to do with getting something actually done.

The priority has to be to push out the white nationalists and their enablers. Fail at that and every other idea will get scuttled anyway.



I was debating a Trump loving friend of mines about healthcare and he was all "You want socialized medicine but look at what's happening right now in Italy during the coronavirus. Deaths. Overwhelmed and undersupplied hospitals etc". I responded by pointing out that we are very lucky Italy got hit before we did and we had time to prepare. Its only the first inning here so I wouldn't strut as if we had this thing conquered. Then during the debate with Bernie that Sunday Joe Biden made essentially the same argument my Trump supporting friend made.

I am ok with compromise. I am not ok with Biden and other Democrats echoing Republican talking points when attacking progressives. I think this is going to destroy the Democratic parties chances of winning the election. Why? Because these attacks from their own party discourage progressives. It discourages young voters. We are unplugging the energy the party needs to move forward. I think this is why Bernie failed to drive turnout the way he hoped and why his campaign quickly collapsed in the face of a united Democratic establishment. I am worried that the very voters we need to propel this party forward are tired of fighting on two fronts and are pulling away rather than pushing forward with us.


That’s not Republican talking point, what Joe was saying is that a Universal Healthcare alone isn’t going to address the issue. What you need is a coordinated Federal response and leadership from the top. And he’s right, assume that this had happened in 2021 in the first month of Bernie Sander’s Presidency, it’s not like he’s going to pass Medicare for all in the midst of a pandemic. Biden is looking at the issue based on the way things are now and from his previous knowledge considering his chief of staff was the Ebola czar, while Bernie is looking at the way things should be. I think they’re both right and not every disagreement is some attack on Progressives.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#369 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:50 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:

I don't know how anyone can flame a pragmatist for encouraging this, but that's what we're seeing on this board. A whole lot of disrespect for those who espouse compromise and strategy as the way forwards. It has nothing to do with being less invested in progressive beliefs, but everything to do with getting something actually done.

The priority has to be to push out the white nationalists and their enablers. Fail at that and every other idea will get scuttled anyway.



I was debating a Trump loving friend of mines about healthcare and he was all "You want socialized medicine but look at what's happening right now in Italy during the coronavirus. Deaths. Overwhelmed and undersupplied hospitals etc". I responded by pointing out that we are very lucky Italy got hit before we did and we had time to prepare. Its only the first inning here so I wouldn't strut as if we had this thing conquered. Then during the debate with Bernie that Sunday Joe Biden made essentially the same argument my Trump supporting friend made.

I am ok with compromise. I am not ok with Biden and other Democrats echoing Republican talking points when attacking progressives. I think this is going to destroy the Democratic parties chances of winning the election. Why? Because these attacks from their own party discourage progressives. It discourages young voters. We are unplugging the energy the party needs to move forward. I think this is why Bernie failed to drive turnout the way he hoped and why his campaign quickly collapsed in the face of a united Democratic establishment. I am worried that the very voters we need to propel this party forward are tired of fighting on two fronts and are pulling away rather than pushing forward with us.


That’s not Republican talking point, what Joe was saying is that a Universal Healthcare alone isn’t going to address the issue. What you need is a coordinated Federal response and leadership from the top. And he’s right, assume that this had happened in 2021 in the first month of Bernie Sander’s Presidency, it’s not like he’s going to pass Medicare for all in the midst of a pandemic. Biden is looking at the issue based on the way things are now and from his previous knowledge considering his chief of staff was the Ebola czar, while Bernie is looking at the way things should be. I think they’re both right and not every disagreement is some attack on Progressives.


Dealing with the current pandemic is a Bernie + Joe issue. Anyone using this issue to divide them or score points is misguided. Whatever their respective approaches, they will be united against their common enemy, Trump and the GOP.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,202
And1: 24,502
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#370 » by Pointgod » Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:51 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
It is probably better to use the term Democratic Socialism when referring to policies most of us would like to see and when referring to the Scandinavian countries.

As a person with close family ties to Sweden, I can say he was entirely correct about the cultural differences being of huge consequence. Sweden began educational reforms about a century ago that raised the education level of the population as a whole and part of that curriculum was instilling in people from an early age the need to sacrifice for the common good. It was a homogenous population then. It is less so now, but that remains the dominant cultural ethics. Variants on this ethos is found in Denmark next door and other close by nations.

Support of community and family is how those countries function and it manifests in the workplace. Not every situation is harmonious because of inevitable human conflicts, but on the whole people know how to get along better there and self-aggrandizement is not really present in their culture. Now, they are not fully socialist countries, just democratic socialists and even they have challenges to keep the social fabric there now.

Just getting started here what a country like Sweden started a hundred years ago is more than a fractured, selfish culture like America can handle in one swallow. You do need to move progressive agendas through mud here, because our culture is not adapted to self-sacrifice any longer. We rallied during WWII, but whatever unity was found then is long gone now.

Their point was spot on about the cultural differences and why you can't graft one social experiment on to another. Cultural DNA predicates how you approach these agendas. No idea gets implemented solely due to its intellectual or moral validity alone. It has to go through a complex political strainer and come out the other end. America is a mess which makes it more tempting to grab on to holistic visions, so I can appreciate that desire, but the more messier situation is the more patience and strategy you need to navigate the path of change. All or nothing is not a strategy for success in American politics. You have to build coalitions or you condemn yourself to another generation howling in the wilderness.


Wow this is spot on! I was going to type out the same thing almost word for word. Americans are too selfish and individualistic to implement a huge shift in Democratic Socialist policies, that’s why you have to go slow. Americans in general are more Conservative than the media and twitter would have you believe. It’s a good thing Republicans haven’t figured that if they stopped being racist they’d have a lock down on politics for decades.


In Scandinavia, you're also more likely to see people from different generations making common cause politically, because there are political factions there and you still have to pick sides. White nationalists are a real threat there too.

My oldest cousin was a firebrand socialist leading strikes at the Volvo factory back in the early 70s. He's a doctor now. Just had his hip replaced. He figured out how to make it work for himself.

In general, respect your elders is a phrase that is more likely to be acted out over there than here. It is given lip service here, but outside of considerations of immediate family, many Americans have little interest in learning from the life experience of others. That's not a uniform fact, but the fairly common reality of our social ethos.


It seems that the recipe for Progressive success is to run as a more moderate but govern as a Progressive. It’s undeniable that people like socialist programs as long as the Socialist label isn’t attached to it. Another thing we know is that on the margins the majority of people really don’t pay attention to policy. Look at all the Republicans that stopped screaming about the deficit once a Republican became President. Bernie and the rest of the Progressive movement should brand themselves as New Deal Democrats. The whole socialist label carries too much negative baggage unfortunately.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#371 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:55 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Wow this is spot on! I was going to type out the same thing almost word for word. Americans are too selfish and individualistic to implement a huge shift in Democratic Socialist policies, that’s why you have to go slow. Americans in general are more Conservative than the media and twitter would have you believe. It’s a good thing Republicans haven’t figured that if they stopped being racist they’d have a lock down on politics for decades.


In Scandinavia, you're also more likely to see people from different generations making common cause politically, because there are political factions there and you still have to pick sides. White nationalists are a real threat there too.

My oldest cousin was a firebrand socialist leading strikes at the Volvo factory back in the early 70s. He's a doctor now. Just had his hip replaced. He figured out how to make it work for himself.

In general, respect your elders is a phrase that is more likely to be acted out over there than here. It is given lip service here, but outside of considerations of immediate family, many Americans have little interest in learning from the life experience of others. That's not a uniform fact, but the fairly common reality of our social ethos.


It seems that the recipe for Progressive success is to run as a more moderate but govern as a Progressive. It’s undeniable that people like socialist programs as long as the Socialist label isn’t attached to it. Another thing we know is that on the margins the majority of people really don’t pay attention to policy. Look at all the Republicans that stopped screaming about the deficit once a Republican became President. Bernie and the rest of the Progressive movement should brand themselves as New Deal Democrats. The whole socialist label carries too much negative baggage unfortunately.


Somebody younger will do the rebranding. Bernie missed that opportunity. His mind doesn't work like that.

Speaking of which, has anyone seen my copy of Saul Alinsky's "Pitch Decks for Radicals"?
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#372 » by HarthorneWingo » Sat Mar 21, 2020 10:03 pm

We found Joe! Well, actually, we found Joe's tweet.



Cuomo for President is trending online.



From Bernie 7 minutes ago. This is leadership.

User avatar
Dave DaButcher
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,698
And1: 4,301
Joined: May 16, 2017
     

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#373 » by Dave DaButcher » Sat Mar 21, 2020 11:22 pm

To those who use the terms "centrist", "moderate" and "compromise" as pejoratives, I would make the following observations:

1. The majority of both Americans and of Democrats are in the center. Any number of polls from Gallup, Pew and the series of exit polls this election cycle support that view. You may not like that fact, but its true.

2. Democrats simply are not buying what Bernie is selling. If it were otherwise, he would be outperforming not underperforming how he did in 2016 (when he benefited by running against an historically disliked candidate).

3. Bernie may have attracted lots of 20 and 30 something support at his rallies, but for some odd reason, those 20 and 30 somethings have not been coming out to vote in large numbers. Why is that? Too woke to vote, perhaps?

4. Any transformational legislation would require a fillibuster-proof 60 votes in the Senate. There will not be 60 Democratic senators in 2021, let alone 60 progressive Democratic senators. So please explain how M4A or the Green New Deal will get passed even if Bernie wins the nomination/presidency (which now can only happen on Earth 2)?

I know Bernie supporters are upset. But how does staying home in November out of spite because their guy didn't win help the progressive cause?
YouthMovement
General Manager
Posts: 9,099
And1: 5,071
Joined: Jun 27, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#374 » by YouthMovement » Sat Mar 21, 2020 11:28 pm

Dave DaButcher wrote:To those who use the terms "centrist", "moderate" and "compromise" as pejoratives, I would make the following observations:

1. The majority of both Americans and of Democrats are in the center. Any number of polls from Gallup, Pew and the series of exit polls this election cycle support that view. You may not like that fact, but its true.

2. Democrats simply are not buying what Bernie is selling. If it were otherwise, he would be outperforming not underperforming how he did in 2016 (when he benefited by running against an historically disliked candidate).

3. Bernie may have attracted lots of 20 and 30 something support at his rallies, but for some odd reason, those 20 and 30 somethings have not been coming out to vote in large numbers. Why is that? Too woke to vote, perhaps?


4. Any transformational legislation would require a fillibuster-proof 60 votes in the Senate. There will not be 60 Democratic senators in 2021, let alone 60 progressive Democratic senators. So please explain how M4A or the Green New Deal will get passed even if Bernie wins the nomination/presidency (which now can only happen on Earth 2)?

I know Bernie supporters are upset. But how does staying home in November out of spite because their guy didn't win help the progressive cause?


I agree with pretty much all of this. and the youth simply don’t vote lol. It’s always a bad call to depend on 18-24 year olds in an election. I believe the 08 obama election was the highest turnout in recent years and that was still under 50% i think. Twitter is misleading.
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#375 » by Knickfan1982 » Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:01 am

Clyde_Style wrote:[

Perhaps you misread my intended point. I meant the left needs to attract voters from the middle, not that they should view the middle as their foundational starting point in terms of policy objectives


If we need to win over people in the middle then we have already lost. Trump is the most polarizing Presidential candidate in a very long time. Why are we wasting our time trying to win over people who would be at least somewhat ok with Trump if he were just behaved more Presidential?

As far as the semantics of "winner takes all" that was intended as a comment on factionalism within the party.
This election is a winner takes all election though. You lose to the GOP, that may be a death sentence for the planet right there.


Moderates may not feel like this is a zero sum game but to me it is. The problems we are facing a huge and demand bold action. We can't even begin to solve them if we're too scared of being called socialists. We won't win if we campaign scared. We won't win if the best argument for our nominee is that he's not the other guy.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#376 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:08 am

Knickfan1982 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:[

Perhaps you misread my intended point. I meant the left needs to attract voters from the middle, not that they should view the middle as their foundational starting point in terms of policy objectives


If we need to win over people in the middle then we have already lost.

As far as the semantics of "winner takes all" that was intended as a comment on factionalism within the party.
This election is a winner takes all election though. You lose to the GOP, that may be a death sentence for the planet right there.


Moderates may not feel like this is a zero sum game but to me it is. The problems we are facing a huge and demand bold action. We can't even begin to solve them if we're too scared of being called socialists. We won't win if we campaign scared. We won't win if the best argument for our nominee is that he's not the other guy.


I agree the next 8 months should not be a campaign scared of pushing strong policy initiatives.

They can't hide behind a Beat Trump slogan.
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#377 » by Knickfan1982 » Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:16 am

Pointgod wrote:
That’s not Republican talking point, what Joe was saying is that a Universal Healthcare alone isn’t going to address the issue. What you need is a coordinated Federal response and leadership from the top. And he’s right, assume that this had happened in 2021 in the first month of Bernie Sander’s Presidency, it’s not like he’s going to pass Medicare for all in the midst of a pandemic. Biden is looking at the issue based on the way things are now and from his previous knowledge considering his chief of staff was the Ebola czar, while Bernie is looking at the way things should be. I think they’re both right and not every disagreement is some attack on Progressives.



I disagree. If Biden wanted to make the point about how important strong leadership is to resolving this crisis he could have done so without trying to point out how one countries socialized medicine has thus far proven inadequate. If he feels Bernie is too much of an ideologue to effectively manage a pandemic like this he should have had the testicular fortitude to say so outright. But he didn't. Maybe because he didn't want to go negative. Maybe because he genuinely thinks Bernie would have been fine in that situation. But he didn't. What he did...in my opinion was try to throw socialized medicine under the bus.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#378 » by Clyde_Style » Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:20 am

Knickfan1982 wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
That’s not Republican talking point, what Joe was saying is that a Universal Healthcare alone isn’t going to address the issue. What you need is a coordinated Federal response and leadership from the top. And he’s right, assume that this had happened in 2021 in the first month of Bernie Sander’s Presidency, it’s not like he’s going to pass Medicare for all in the midst of a pandemic. Biden is looking at the issue based on the way things are now and from his previous knowledge considering his chief of staff was the Ebola czar, while Bernie is looking at the way things should be. I think they’re both right and not every disagreement is some attack on Progressives.



I disagree. If Biden wanted to make the point about how important strong leadership is to resolving this crisis he could have done so without trying to point out how one countries socialized medicine has thus far proven inadequate. If he feels Bernie is too much of an ideologue to effectively manage a pandemic like this he should have had the testicular fortitude to say so outright. But he didn't. Maybe because he didn't want to go negative. Maybe because he genuinely thinks Bernie would have been fine in that situation. But he didn't. What he did...in my opinion was try to throw socialized medicine under the bus.


We know Biden is going to carry that beast called Obamacare into the general election. TBH, I didn't even expect him to address making changes like the public option. I do hope we get universal health care someday. I think it is now in the conversation and may happen down the road 5-10 years from now.
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#379 » by Knickfan1982 » Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:35 am

Dave DaButcher wrote:To those who use the terms "centrist", "moderate" and "compromise" as pejoratives, I would make the following observations:

1. The majority of both Americans and of Democrats are in the center. Any number of polls from Gallup, Pew and the series of exit polls this election cycle support that view. You may not like that fact, but its true.


It is true but that's why our nation has had so much difficulty resolving its structural problems.

2. Democrats simply are not buying what Bernie is selling. If it were otherwise, he would be outperforming not underperforming how he did in 2016 (when he benefited by running against an historically disliked candidate).

3. Bernie may have attracted lots of 20 and 30 something support at his rallies, but for some odd reason, those 20 and 30 somethings have not been coming out to vote in large numbers. Why is that? Too woke to vote, perhaps?


I believe the issue is what I alluded to earlier. Speaking for myself it often feels as if my own party doesn't really value me. People like myself are trying to wage a political fight against those on the right only to be attacked by people who are supposed to be on our side. When there are only two viable parties my only choices are accept being bullied into voting for a candidate I don't believe in or check out of the process completely. I think most people in that situation choose to check out.

Its a self defeating cycle. The Democrats ignore young voters who then don't turn out since their voices aren't being heard and then the party uses their decision not to vote as an excuse to continue ignoring them.

4. Any transformational legislation would require a fillibuster-proof 60 votes in the Senate. There will not be 60 Democratic senators in 2021, let alone 60 progressive Democratic senators. So please explain how M4A or the Green New Deal will get passed even if Bernie wins the nomination/presidency (which now can only happen on Earth 2)?


You don't need 60 votes with reconciliation. Both Houses of Congress pass their own versions of the bill. The two then send teams to negotiate a final version of the bill which does not need 60 votes. Would it be easy? No. But possible.
I know Bernie supporters are upset. But how does staying home in November out of spite because their guy didn't win help the progressive cause?


I can't speak for anyone else. I am lucky enough to live in a state that is guaranteed to go for Biden in November. I don't have to throw my vote away on a terrible candidate I don't believe in. But I tell all my friends in more purple states to hold their noses and vote for Joe Biden.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
User avatar
Stannis
RealGM
Posts: 19,594
And1: 13,003
Joined: Dec 05, 2011
Location: Game 1, 2025 ECF
 

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#380 » by Stannis » Sun Mar 22, 2020 2:37 am

Dave DaButcher wrote:
3. Bernie may have attracted lots of 20 and 30 something support at his rallies, but for some odd reason, those 20 and 30 somethings have not been coming out to vote in large numbers. Why is that? Too woke to vote, perhaps?

But how does staying home in November out of spite because their guy didn't win help the progressive cause?


This seems like an oxymoron. Apparently Bernie supporters don't vote. So why would you expect anything from them in November other than not voting?

Sounds like some are already trying to find their scapegoat come November.
Free Palestine
End The Occupation

https://youtu.be/mOnZ628-7_E?feature=shared&t=33

Return to New York Knicks