Richfield wrote:Fairview4Life wrote:ClipsFanSince98 wrote:Are you implying science isn't capable of altering DNA, and that sequencing would determine whether or not it's completely unaltered ? If so you are wrong my friend. The Indian scientists from an elite institute published that peer reviewed journal to the contrary. They were quickly shut down, vanished and deleted the works. They concluded that the strand seemed to have unnaturally occuring HIV "binding sites" or "inserts".
Yeah, they’re wrong, which is probably why their incorrect nonsense about hiv binding sites or insert was quickly taken down.
I don't know who to believe. But this sounds more plausible out of the two scenarios.
Were they silenced in a way that other scientists can't take their idea and test it to see if they were right? It seems scientists somewhere should be able to reproduce their results or explain why they were right to the rest of the scientific world.
In other words, if what they said in their science was true, do you think other scientists would keep it a secret? Or say no, they were right?
Or is there only a handful of people in the world that understand their genius? And they all want these guys silenced. I guess that's a small possibility too?
Anyone can study the genome. It has been published.






























