bwgood77 wrote:
Don't like these graphs, too much error in testing variance.
If they did a graph based on deaths rather than cases then it'd be more accurate but even that has substantial error.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

bwgood77 wrote:

Hornet Mania wrote:whatisacenter wrote:at this point you better hope you live in a state where the governor is taking this seriously as we are being led by a rudderless ship federally.
I'm not even sure that will help much, unfortunately. If California hypothetically handles the crisis well but Arizona goes full 'live free or die, seriously, we mean it' what's to stop asymptomatic residents of AZ who care carriers of the virus from crossing over to CA to find safety? (To be clear, I'm not saying AZ is handling it poorly, just a quick border state to name for this example)
Coordination is important and the restrictions have to be consistent across the board. If some states are inconvenienced because they aren't hard-hit yet have to deal with NY-level restrictions then they should consider themselves fortunate for being bored rather than watching neighbors and relatives fight for their lives.

zimpy27 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Don't like these graphs, too much error in testing variance.
If they did a graph based on deaths rather than cases then it'd be more accurate but even that has substantial error.

LKN wrote:Dirk wrote:Italy, updated
• Active cases: 57.521 (+3.491)
• Deaths: 7.503 (+683)
• Recovered: 9.362 (+1.036)
• Intensive care: 3.489 (+93)
Total cases: 74.386 (+5.210, +7,5%)
Yesterday's update:Spoiler:
So after a "bad" day this is semi-encouraging. If they can keep this up they should be able to get their hospitals back under control at some point.
zimpy27 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Don't like these graphs, too much error in testing variance.
If they did a graph based on deaths rather than cases then it'd be more accurate but even that has substantial error.

LKN wrote:Dirk wrote:Italy, updated
• Active cases: 57.521 (+3.491)
• Deaths: 7.503 (+683)
• Recovered: 9.362 (+1.036)
• Intensive care: 3.489 (+93)
Total cases: 74.386 (+5.210, +7,5%)
Yesterday's update:Spoiler:
So after a "bad" day this is semi-encouraging. If they can keep this up they should be able to get their hospitals back under control at some point.
Dirk wrote:LKN wrote:Dirk wrote:Italy, updated
• Active cases: 57.521 (+3.491)
• Deaths: 7.503 (+683)
• Recovered: 9.362 (+1.036)
• Intensive care: 3.489 (+93)
Total cases: 74.386 (+5.210, +7,5%)
Yesterday's update:Spoiler:
So after a "bad" day this is semi-encouraging. If they can keep this up they should be able to get their hospitals back under control at some point.
They haven't seen a steep decline in numbers. While you can see some decline, it is definitely nothing that really boosts their morale.
They will hit 8.000 deaths in tomorrow's update. In Italy, on average over the last 5 years, there are 8.000 deaths from flu... (another stat for anyone who is in denial).
More perverse, the Head of the Civil Protection has symptoms. I noticed this guy was doing all the press conferences. He missed this update.
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/fears-over-health-of-italys-covid-19-point-man-/1779260
Hornet Mania wrote:whatisacenter wrote:at this point you better hope you live in a state where the governor is taking this seriously as we are being led by a rudderless ship federally.
I'm not even sure that will help much, unfortunately. If California hypothetically handles the crisis well but Arizona goes full 'live free or die, seriously, we mean it' what's to stop asymptomatic residents of AZ who care carriers of the virus from crossing over to CA to find safety? (To be clear, I'm not saying AZ is handling it poorly, just a quick border state to name for this example)
Coordination is important and the restrictions have to be consistent across the board. If some states are inconvenienced because they aren't hard-hit yet have to deal with NY-level restrictions then they should consider themselves fortunate for being bored rather than watching neighbors and relatives fight for their lives.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Hornet Mania wrote:whatisacenter wrote:at this point you better hope you live in a state where the governor is taking this seriously as we are being led by a rudderless ship federally.
I'm not even sure that will help much, unfortunately. If California hypothetically handles the crisis well but Arizona goes full 'live free or die, seriously, we mean it' what's to stop asymptomatic residents of AZ who care carriers of the virus from crossing over to CA to find safety? (To be clear, I'm not saying AZ is handling it poorly, just a quick border state to name for this example)
Coordination is important and the restrictions have to be consistent across the board. If some states are inconvenienced because they aren't hard-hit yet have to deal with NY-level restrictions then they should consider themselves fortunate for being bored rather than watching neighbors and relatives fight for their lives.
A federal mandate that all people in public and work spaces wear masks to contain interstate spread. People will quickly ostracize those who don't follow the law, and they can make it a fine for not abiding.
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using RealGM mobile app


Slacktard wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Hornet Mania wrote:
I'm not even sure that will help much, unfortunately. If California hypothetically handles the crisis well but Arizona goes full 'live free or die, seriously, we mean it' what's to stop asymptomatic residents of AZ who care carriers of the virus from crossing over to CA to find safety? (To be clear, I'm not saying AZ is handling it poorly, just a quick border state to name for this example)
Coordination is important and the restrictions have to be consistent across the board. If some states are inconvenienced because they aren't hard-hit yet have to deal with NY-level restrictions then they should consider themselves fortunate for being bored rather than watching neighbors and relatives fight for their lives.
A federal mandate that all people in public and work spaces wear masks to contain interstate spread. People will quickly ostracize those who don't follow the law, and they can make it a fine for not abiding.
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using RealGM mobile app
ok. But if masks are being rationed for medical workers how are you going to have masks for hundreds of millions of workers?

zimpy27 wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Don't like these graphs, too much error in testing variance.
If they did a graph based on deaths rather than cases then it'd be more accurate but even that has substantial error.
Sedale Threatt wrote:Hopefully, the NBA was able to shut down quick enough. The huge outbreak in Northern Italy appears to have stemmed from a soccer match (now being called "Game Zero"), with around 1/3 of the population of one team's town attending in Milan, returning home and boom.
“I’m sure that 40,000 people hugging and kissing each other while standing a centimeter apart — four times, because Atalanta scored four goals (the final result was 4-1) — was definitely a huge accelerator for contagion,” Lorini told The Associated Press on Wednesday.
https://www.startribune.com/game-zero-spread-of-virus-linked-to-champions-league-match/569092442/