Dloading24 wrote:I think its wrong how some people are looking at this, as they are viewing some teams over their single champion season. Most championship teams remain in contention over multiple years thus shouldn't be viewed by their one-off ship. That's why most people would point to Mavs or Raps championship as the weakest, as they were not able to sustain excellence over multiple years. Spurs 07 might have been an easy title run, but they had been a championship team that was kept relatively the same over the course of 05-07, it would be in-correct to just view them from the one ship as it was basically the same team that had won the ship in 05 (only different by like 1-2 rotational players). Same goes for the 08 Celts that if not for KG injury in 09 would have probably gone to the finals 3 straight times. Same with the lakers 10 teams that was basically the championship team from 09 (didn't even make the list) to suddenly in contention one of the worst championship teams because they swapped Ariza for Artest? 15 warriors were basically a team that was able to go 73-9 next season and 1 game from a championship. That just leave Mavs and Raps. My pick is the Raps as the Mavs went through a gauntlet with difficult opponents each round
This is bull crap. Who cares about succeeding seasons? The 2010 Lakers shouldnt be rated higher cause they won in 2009.