Baarignani wrote:Stillwater wrote:Baarignani wrote:That last link states it can only stay airborne under laboratory conditions. Therefore it can't stay airborne in any natural conditions on earth.
Wrong here is the verbiage you missed about the facts within the article:
"The JAMA study that came to this conclusion was conducted in Singapore. To assess the ability of the virus to survive in the air, researchers developed what one expert described as “bizarre experiments done under very ideal controllable experimental conditions.” Researchers used a rotating drum to suspend the aerosols, and provided temperature and humidity levels closely simulating hospital (and not real world) conditions. Dr. Marr commented the experimental setup might be less comfortable for the virus than a real-life setting."
= the controlled lab environment was less likely to reveal airborne than the real world is and still revealed it
Wouldn't "very ideal controllable experimental conditions" mean they were ideal for the virus to stay airborne? Ideal as in better than anywhere else. I assume they weren't trying to create ideal conditions for killing the virus because that would be dumb.
No they were testing for it in a situation that might simulate a more controlled hospital environment to access risk to healthcare workers while treating infected patients.
The only thing dumb is not being more of this type of testing to match real world conditions for more difinitive expectations.
It's aerosol transfer is real but just how much is left up in the air...

































