CantStopTheRock wrote:jrask wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:CP24 guest doctor today:
Q1: Answers a question about transmission. Talks about how asymptomatic and presymptomatic people are still contagious.
Q2: Gets asked about masks. Says there is a debate, but he doesn't recommend wearing them as per official public health guidelines (people can wear them if they want to though) as they only offer a "sliver of protection" (without ever mentioning they keep asymptomatic or presymptomatic people from infecting others...).
Q3: Third question leads into a discussion on PPE and he mentions how important it is for HCWs to have surgical masks (not even N95) to protect themselves from the virus.
I had to make sure I wasn't watching an Onion skit.
That’s outrageous
People like this have blood on their hands
Not sure why you think that is skit worthy or people deserve to have blood on their hands. If people social distance there is very little risk, if any, with people getting infected from asymptomatic or presymptomatic person where a mask would have a factor.
That doesn't mean they are not contagious, it is just the risk is negligible if social distancing
It is important to HCW because they cannot social distance. I am sure he would say the same thing if it is a regular person that could not practice social distancing
What kills me is almost every pro mask article is using case studies of masking symptomatic people to prove their point of masking everyone.
Including the article Nox posted a couple pages back (pro mask everyone). Yet, looking at the case study, surprise the journalist completely ignored all this
"A subset of participants (72/246, 29%) did not cough at all during at least one exhaled breath collection, including 37/147 (25%) during the without-mask and 42/148 (28%) during the with-mask breath collection. In this subset for coronavirus (n = 4), we did not detect any virus in respiratory droplets or aerosols from any participants."
"our study only included symptomatic individuals and common coronaviruses RNA was not identified from respiratory droplets or aerosols of the small number of infected individuals who did not cough"
"Given the high collection efficiency of the machine22, and given that each exhaled breath collection was done for 30 minutes, this might imply that prolonged close contact would be required for transmission to occur"
So very limited spread with someone breathing. A person sneezing and coughing are already told to cover up or better yet stay home. So where is all this risk if people social distance?
It is like telling someone who is sitting in the shade (social distancing) how damaging the sun is and referencing a case study on life guards and sunscreen usage and argue they are at risk. Then going on and complaining about a doctor saying if you are in the sun (at risk no social distancing, ie. HCW) you should wear it, but if you are in the shade (social distancing, no risk) you don't need it. That is not contradictory nor is it untruthful.
Do asymptomatic people not go grocery shopping? Of course if everyone wore a mask we'd be better off. But the reality is that there are nurses out there without them on the front lines and our government doesn't have masks for them. Not only that, they don't let them bring their own from home.






























