ImageImageImageImageImage

OT: Democratic Primary Thread

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

Who are you voting for?

Poll ended at Sat Mar 14, 2020 11:48 pm

Joe Biden - I have no idea why, and I also forgot what year it is
18
28%
Bernie Sanders - I am an intelligent human being, and understand Sanders is our last hope and America needs him
38
58%
Tulsi Gabbard (Dropped Out) - Ringo Starr is also my favorite Beatle
9
14%
 
Total votes: 65

User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,104
And1: 137,829
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#741 » by 3toheadmelo » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:50 pm

K-DOT wrote:Taken from the CA board:

Biden rolls out new policies in effort to court Sanders supporters

The Biden campaign announced two new policies on Thursday on health care and student debt that are squarely aimed at appealing to supporters of Bernie Sanders, who ended his campaign for the Democratic nomination on Wednesday.



The policy announcements directly reference Sanders and his supporters, noting that they can "take pride in their work in laying the groundwork for these ideas."



2. Forgive student debt for low-income and middle-class individuals who have attended public colleges and universities.

Specifically, Biden's proposal forgives all undergraduate tuition-related federal student debt from two- and four-year public colleges and universities — as well as private Historically Black Colleges and Universities and private, underfunded Minority-Serving Institutions.



This is in addition to Biden's existing student debt proposals, which include an Elizabeth Warren-backed plan to cancel a minimum of $10,000 of student debt per person during the coronavirus crisis.


Taken from: https://www.axios.com/joe-biden-bernie-sanders-medicare-student-debt-8541ae75-077b-4752-9b3d-cd149003b9d3.html

It also includes lowering the Medicare age.



I like this. If Biden is serious about taking on more progressive policies and pandering to the progressives, I'll take back nearly all of my criticisms of him

Image
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#742 » by Knickfan1982 » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:53 pm

K-DOT wrote:Taken from the CA board:

Biden rolls out new policies in effort to court Sanders supporters

The Biden campaign announced two new policies on Thursday on health care and student debt that are squarely aimed at appealing to supporters of Bernie Sanders, who ended his campaign for the Democratic nomination on Wednesday.



The policy announcements directly reference Sanders and his supporters, noting that they can "take pride in their work in laying the groundwork for these ideas."



2. Forgive student debt for low-income and middle-class individuals who have attended public colleges and universities.

Specifically, Biden's proposal forgives all undergraduate tuition-related federal student debt from two- and four-year public colleges and universities — as well as private Historically Black Colleges and Universities and private, underfunded Minority-Serving Institutions.



This is in addition to Biden's existing student debt proposals, which include an Elizabeth Warren-backed plan to cancel a minimum of $10,000 of student debt per person during the coronavirus crisis.


Taken from: https://www.axios.com/joe-biden-bernie-sanders-medicare-student-debt-8541ae75-077b-4752-9b3d-cd149003b9d3.html

It also includes lowering the Medicare age.



I like this. If Biden is serious about taking on more progressive policies and pandering to the progressives, I'll take back nearly all of my criticisms of him


Its certainly a sign that he isn't taking us for granted like Shillary did. But he's going to have to thread the needle because he wants to bring us in without alienating the Republican-lite voters who make up his base of support.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,011
And1: 45,780
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#743 » by GONYK » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:54 pm

Knickfan1982 wrote:
K-DOT wrote:Taken from the CA board:

Biden rolls out new policies in effort to court Sanders supporters



Taken from: https://www.axios.com/joe-biden-bernie-sanders-medicare-student-debt-8541ae75-077b-4752-9b3d-cd149003b9d3.html

It also includes lowering the Medicare age.



I like this. If Biden is serious about taking on more progressive policies and pandering to the progressives, I'll take back nearly all of my criticisms of him


Its certainly a sign that he isn't taking us for granted like Shillary did. But he's going to have to thread the needle because he wants to bring us in without alienating the Republican-lite voters who make up his base of support.


Black voters are "Republican-lite"?
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,766
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#744 » by Phish Tank » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:54 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Phish Tank wrote:all the policies are nice, but we need a Senate to pass this for us.

Also doesn't help that the courts are stacked against us (thanks to the Jill Stein crowd and RBG/Breyer, who refused to step down 10 years ago)


All the blame is on the DNC and Hillary. They ran the entire show and they lost. Period.

I take it that if Biden also losses that it'll be Bernie's fault?


no, but then they can't complain about various things once Republicans stack the courts even further and further ruin things for all of us due to not voting.

Only way to change a system is to enter it and destroy it.
Image
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,607
And1: 30,810
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#745 » by Jeff Van Gully » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:54 pm

Stannis wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
Stannis wrote:Only way to go about it. You want progressive voters, you have to have progressive policies.


warren makes a lot of sense as VP if he's going this route.

Downside to that is you go from a moderate straight to progressive after Biden finishes his first term. The establishment isn't ready for that yet.

They will just throw a few policies here and there first.


maybe so, but it's a start for progressives at this point.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#746 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:57 pm

GONYK wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
GONYK wrote:
I never said they were objectionable. I said they weren't objective.

They are just as biased as you accuse someone like Silver of being. You just like their bias :lol:


That's what we're fighting for. No more, no less. Why is supporting those policies biased?


I didn't say supporting those policies are biased. I said the videos you post are biased, in the sense that they are not objective news.

Why is Nate Silver biased?


Let's put Nate Silver on the back burner for the moment. He's a statistician my sources are policy wonks.

Why don't you answer my question about the policies because, in the end, that's what's most important. That's what we progressives are fighting for. You claimed my sources were biased. I responded by stating that they/we are fighting for certain and specific changes to the way America does business. The question is, "Do you agree with those proposed changes or not?"
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#747 » by Knickfan1982 » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:57 pm

GONYK wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
K-DOT wrote:Taken from the CA board:




I like this. If Biden is serious about taking on more progressive policies and pandering to the progressives, I'll take back nearly all of my criticisms of him


Its certainly a sign that he isn't taking us for granted like Shillary did. But he's going to have to thread the needle because he wants to bring us in without alienating the Republican-lite voters who make up his base of support.


Black voters are "Republican-lite"?

Yes because of course I was talking about black people. I forgot Biden's campaign made a similar lazy race baiting statement after South Carolina. :roll:
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,011
And1: 45,780
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#748 » by GONYK » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:58 pm

Knickfan1982 wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
Its certainly a sign that he isn't taking us for granted like Shillary did. But he's going to have to thread the needle because he wants to bring us in without alienating the Republican-lite voters who make up his base of support.


Black voters are "Republican-lite"?

Yes because of course I was talking about black people. :roll:


Black voters are unquestionably Joe Biden's base
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#749 » by Knickfan1982 » Thu Apr 9, 2020 8:59 pm

GONYK wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Black voters are "Republican-lite"?

Yes because of course I was talking about black people. :roll:


Black voters are unquestionably Joe Biden's base



You want to make this a racial thing have at it buddy. You'll be pissing in the wind.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#750 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:00 pm

GONYK wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Black voters are "Republican-lite"?

Yes because of course I was talking about black people. :roll:


Black voters are unquestionably Joe Biden's base


Older black voters, not younger. The question is why?
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,766
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#751 » by Phish Tank » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:00 pm

GONYK wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Black voters are "Republican-lite"?

Yes because of course I was talking about black people. :roll:


Black voters are unquestionably Joe Biden's base


yep, and older democrats.
Image
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#752 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:00 pm

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/feb/25/pete-buttigieg/polls-show-most-democrats-many-americans-back-key-/

How popular are Sanders’ proposals?

We collected recent poll results on most of these proposals and put them into the chart below. The questions in these polls did not identify the ideas as being backed by Sanders, and they offered basic descriptions of the plans, without mentioning complications, such as the cost involved.

The data shows that — contrary to what Buttigieg said — a large share of Democrats support Sanders’ economic proposals, according to polls. Among Democrats, single-payer health care receives upwards of 58% support, the Green New Deal gets 86%, a $15 minimum wage gets 84%, tuition-free college gets 76%, student-loan forgiveness gets 79%, breaking up big banks gets 60%, and paid family leave gets 94%.
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,766
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#753 » by Phish Tank » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:02 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/feb/25/pete-buttigieg/polls-show-most-democrats-many-americans-back-key-/

How popular are Sanders’ proposals?

We collected recent poll results on most of these proposals and put them into the chart below. The questions in these polls did not identify the ideas as being backed by Sanders, and they offered basic descriptions of the plans, without mentioning complications, such as the cost involved.

The data shows that — contrary to what Buttigieg said — a large share of Democrats support Sanders’ economic proposals, according to polls. Among Democrats, single-payer health care receives upwards of 58% support, the Green New Deal gets 86%, a $15 minimum wage gets 84%, tuition-free college gets 76%, student-loan forgiveness gets 79%, breaking up big banks gets 60%, and paid family leave gets 94%.


Problem I have with Polls - Wingo - is that it predominantly skews towards already super safe democratic districts (i.e. New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc etc etc). Real question is how do these polls skew electorally state-by-state and weighted against the registered voter base?
Image
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,011
And1: 45,780
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#754 » by GONYK » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:05 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
GONYK wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
That's what we're fighting for. No more, no less. Why is supporting those policies biased?


I didn't say supporting those policies are biased. I said the videos you post are biased, in the sense that they are not objective news.

Why is Nate Silver biased?


Let's put Nate Silver on the back burner for the moment. He's a statistician my sources are policy wonks.

Why don't you answer my question about the policies because, in the end, that's what's most important. That's what we progressives are fighting for. You claimed my sources were biased. I responded by stating that they/we are fighting for certain and specific changes to the way America does business. The question is, "Do you agree with those proposed changes or not?"


Yes, I agree with them.

That doesn't change the nature of my question to you.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#755 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:06 pm

Phish Tank wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Phish Tank wrote:all the policies are nice, but we need a Senate to pass this for us.

Also doesn't help that the courts are stacked against us (thanks to the Jill Stein crowd and RBG/Breyer, who refused to step down 10 years ago)


All the blame is on the DNC and Hillary. They ran the entire show and they lost. Period.

I take it that if Biden also losses that it'll be Bernie's fault?


no, but then they can't complain about various things once Republicans stack the courts even further and further ruin things for all of us due to not voting.

Only way to change a system is to enter it and destroy it.


Look, no one is ever going to get each and every one of their primary opponent's voters. Obama didn't get many Hillary Clinton supporters who claimed he was a sexist. In fact, more Clinton supporters didn't vote for Barack than Sanders supporters who didn't vote for Clinton in '16.

Btw, I agree on the courts which is why my position in '16 and now in '20 is that if you are a swing voter in a swing state, you have to vote for the Democratic nominee. But I live in NY state. Clinton won here by 20 points in '16 which enabled me to cast a protest vote. I plan on voting for Bernie in the primary here since he'll still be on the ballot and we'll see what the general looks like in November. If Biden is up by the same large lead as Hillary in '16, I'll probably write-in Bernie. If it's at all close, I'll vote for Biden.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 40,278
And1: 57,897
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#756 » by robillionaire » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:07 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
There are mile long bread lines already. NGO food banks in the USA are already depleting their cash reserves to feed people because their usual donors are donations from supermarkets giving expiring items and restaurant excess food supply. Even usual food drive sources from citizens are drying up because people are keeping their canned goods for themselves instead of reaching into their pantry.

If private organizations trying to make up the shortfall that government food subsidies are not covering for what are now tens of millions of people with no money and no food, how do you expect people to rally around the flag?

The devastation has only just begun. By this Summer we're talking about serious crime issues as people get desperate and law enforcement is cut in half by the virus.

Social disorder will be a big issue going into the election and it is not going to get better between now and the election, but significantly worse. I'm preparing for it. Are you prepared for it? Maybe you're in a safe apartment building in the city, but many of us are not. But since you got laid off, maybe you have to move soon. I hope you have a family that will take you in. There's tens of millions of people out there that don't have fallback options.

And I don't think Trump can win on a law and order platform since many will consider him the reason things fell apart. He's the most lawless individual imaginable.



That's true in a sense, I'm effectively already in a bread line as I'm waiting for my unemployment check like 12 million other people are. If the election was today, Trump may lose. But we don't know how things will recover by November. If we get the doomsday "riots in the streets" scenario you describe, being in a post-apocalyptic Manhattan would be the last place in which someone would be safe. But I'd also be participating and supporting the protest movement as I think they are long overdue and have already been calling for a yellow vest movement. I am ready and prepared for mass civil disobedience and believe we need it more now than ever. We should make occupy wall street look like a picnic and occupy the whole island. The final fallback option should be a revolution, nothing less. It's becoming increasingly clear to many that we have nothing left to lose. I hope it happens. That would give me a ray of hope.

I don't know and I won't dig too deep into the rabbit hole on the Ukraine issue but in 2016 people were practically begging for Trump to be the nominee, some may say uplifting him as a pied piper candidate, because it would be an easy win. We know how that turned out. If I recall correctly you strongly believed that once the evidence came out from Mueller and russiagate that it would take down Trump, and the MSNBC pundits had the plot all mapped out and assured everyone it would be the end of him. But it wasn't. Then the thought was that impeachment would have him removed and certainly his own party would turn on him because the case against him was so very strong, but there was never even a chance. Not only that, both of these things strengthened the support for Trump and boosted his chances of re-election. Now we are to believe Trump is scared of Biden. You'll have to excuse my skepticism!

Biden had been coronated as the front runner for a long time, but despite that his campaign looked dead in the water as of February and it took a tremendous coordinated effort by the party to coalesce around him using his win in a solid GOP state in which he had poured all his resources as a springboard and having the other candidates in a suspiciously packed field drop out and endorse him at targeted times to carry him to this nomination. I just don't really buy his strength as a candidate. I have just personally never seen any genuine enthusiastic support for him amongst the masses. Also I don't think he'll perform well vs Trump on the debate stage.

I'm not saying Sanders would have won or would even do any better, at this point that ship has sailed and there's no reason to discuss him. But it would be a folly to write off Trump or believe he's scared after everything we've seen since 2016. I'm originally from the south as I was born in Florida and raised in Kentucky and I visit family down there on occasion. It's a rabid fanatical cult. He really could shoot someone and not lose support. The virus is a blessing in the sense that it might stop him from filling football stadiums with his klan rallies.

I honestly feel the most generous thing I can do to help out is to shut up and stop talking about the election. I was already planning to do so but this is still a fresh topic that warrants some final predictions and thoughts. But after this I'm going radio silent on this entire election. Because I don't have anything nice to say about what happened over the course of the past 5 years, and if you don't have anything nice to say, well, you know how it goes.

One other thing though, at some point we probably need to be honest that progressives/leftists have fundamental and perhaps irreconcilable differences with the (let's call it the biden wing or establishment wing or "centrist" or whatever you prefer) of the dem party and vice versa. We just don't have the same values or vision for what this country is supposed to be. There is a tangible genuine dislike between people in these camps, I'm sure you see it and feel it when you post on twitter or here. So why should we cover our eyes and ears and blame the russians or the gop for this divide and write off anybody who expresses their discontent as a russian agent, as opposed to facing up to the tough reality that there's a real tangible ideological divide on the issues? We are repeatedly told our agenda is impossible and told we need to fall in line while getting nothing in return. But we aren't going to stop demanding medicare for all or a green new deal or economic justice for working class people. It's literally life and death for some people. Now more than ever. The virus highlights the contradictions in the system. This is just an appetizer for the climate crisis, the response to this is a test balloon for the climate crisis. Gonna be a wild decade. Edit: I meant to mention that AOC recently said “in any other country Joe Biden and I would not be in the same party.” I tend to agree


Thanks for the reply. Don't have the time the rest of today to post, but will get back to you.


Eh, don’t feel obligated. I’m sorry I even typed so much. I have a lot of extra free time now. :lol:
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,766
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#757 » by Phish Tank » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:07 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Phish Tank wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
All the blame is on the DNC and Hillary. They ran the entire show and they lost. Period.

I take it that if Biden also losses that it'll be Bernie's fault?


no, but then they can't complain about various things once Republicans stack the courts even further and further ruin things for all of us due to not voting.

Only way to change a system is to enter it and destroy it.


Look, no one is ever going to get each and every one of their primary opponent's voters. Obama didn't get many Hillary Clinton supporters who claimed he was a sexist. In fact, more Clinton supporters didn't vote for Barack than Sanders supporters who didn't vote for Clinton in '16.

Btw, I agree on the courts which is why my position in '16 and now in '20 is that if you are a swing voter in a swing state, you have to vote for the Democratic nominee. But I live in NY state. Clinton won here by 20 points in '16 which enabled me to cast a protest vote. I plan on voting for Bernie in the primary here since he'll still be on the ballot and we'll see what the general looks like in November. If Biden is up by the same large lead as Hillary in '16, I'll probably write-in Bernie. If it's at all close, I'll vote for Biden.


The bolded paragraph is the most important one out of our entire conversation.
Image
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#758 » by HarthorneWingo » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:08 pm

GONYK wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
GONYK wrote:
I didn't say supporting those policies are biased. I said the videos you post are biased, in the sense that they are not objective news.

Why is Nate Silver biased?


Let's put Nate Silver on the back burner for the moment. He's a statistician my sources are policy wonks.

Why don't you answer my question about the policies because, in the end, that's what's most important. That's what we progressives are fighting for. You claimed my sources were biased. I responded by stating that they/we are fighting for certain and specific changes to the way America does business. The question is, "Do you agree with those proposed changes or not?"


Yes, I agree with them.

That doesn't change the nature of my question to you.


And therefore my sources are not biased! They happen to agree with most Americans.

So then why would you support the candidate who opposes them?
Knickfan1982
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 2,185
Joined: Mar 19, 2016
       

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#759 » by Knickfan1982 » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:11 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Knickfan1982 wrote:Yes because of course I was talking about black people. :roll:


Black voters are unquestionably Joe Biden's base


Older black voters, not younger. The question is why?



Association with Obama. He didn't have a so called "black" base the other 2 times he ran for President.
Why rely on nuance, facts and logic when you can bludgeon the other side with mindless repetition of "Duuur McDaniel's has potential :tooth and still be treated as if you were reasonable.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,011
And1: 45,780
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: OT: Democratic Primary Thread 

Post#760 » by GONYK » Thu Apr 9, 2020 9:11 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
GONYK wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Let's put Nate Silver on the back burner for the moment. He's a statistician my sources are policy wonks.

Why don't you answer my question about the policies because, in the end, that's what's most important. That's what we progressives are fighting for. You claimed my sources were biased. I responded by stating that they/we are fighting for certain and specific changes to the way America does business. The question is, "Do you agree with those proposed changes or not?"


Yes, I agree with them.

That doesn't change the nature of my question to you.


So then why would you support the candidate who opposes them?


Because the only thing I care about this time around is removing Trump. I care about that over literally anything else.

If Trump all of a sudden advocated for the exact same policies as Bernie, I would still vote against him, because I find him that repulsive to the American ideal.

Now can we get back to my question? :lol:

Return to New York Knicks