PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

ardee
RealGM
Posts: 15,320
And1: 5,397
Joined: Nov 16, 2011

PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#1 » by ardee » Sun Apr 12, 2020 12:51 pm

Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,849
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#2 » by Colbinii » Sun Apr 12, 2020 1:16 pm

Looks promising!

Thanks for doing this Ardee--perfect time for this type of game.
User avatar
Odinn21
Analyst
Posts: 3,514
And1: 2,942
Joined: May 19, 2019
 

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#3 » by Odinn21 » Sun Apr 12, 2020 1:43 pm

So the only rules are I know as of now;
1. Seasons from 1976-77 and onwards
2. 85 FGA

But I don't know how many players we're getting. 5? 8? 9? 12? 85 FGA for how many players?

Also, this is my first time participating an all-time fantasy draft on a message board. Do we just post teams right away? Or we follow a serpentine order draft?
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,849
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#4 » by Colbinii » Sun Apr 12, 2020 1:50 pm

Odinn21 wrote:So the only rules are I know as of now;
1. Seasons from 1976-77 and onwards
2. 85 FGA

But I don't know how many players we're getting. 5? 8? 9? 12? 85 FGA for how many players?

Also, this is my first time participating an all-time fantasy draft on a message board. Do we just post teams right away? Or we follow a serpentine order draft?


You can start updating your roster once you pick players.

Its ABBABABA order.
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,283
And1: 7,604
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#5 » by Fadeaway_J » Sun Apr 12, 2020 1:55 pm

Odinn21 wrote:So the only rules are I know as of now;
1. Seasons from 1976-77 and onwards
2. 85 FGA

But I don't know how many players we're getting. 5? 8? 9? 12? 85 FGA for how many players?

Also, this is my first time participating an all-time fantasy draft on a message board. Do we just post teams right away? Or we follow a serpentine order draft?

The full rules are in the draft thread.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,001
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#6 » by Dutchball97 » Sun Apr 12, 2020 2:15 pm

When you can't be around for your pick, should you PM a list of picks to account for the people that pick before you or do you just send your 1 pick and hope nobody else picks him before you?
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,849
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#7 » by Colbinii » Sun Apr 12, 2020 2:20 pm

Dutchball97 wrote:When you can't be around for your pick, should you PM a list of picks to account for the people that pick before you or do you just send your 1 pick and hope nobody else picks him before you?


Send a top 3 to someone after you.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,243
And1: 97,957
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#8 » by Texas Chuck » Sun Apr 12, 2020 3:46 pm

70sfan with the pick I hoped he make. Tim Duncan would have been my first choice as well.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,849
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#9 » by Colbinii » Sun Apr 12, 2020 3:55 pm

Odinn21 wrote:
70sFan wrote:Give me Tim Duncan

Odinn21 wrote:...

Did you have to get TD?.. You made me sad man. :banghead: :oops: :x
:lol: :lol:

Was hoping you'd let TD slip.

(According to time table I have some hours to pick I think?)


Don't post discussion in the draft thread.
User avatar
Odinn21
Analyst
Posts: 3,514
And1: 2,942
Joined: May 19, 2019
 

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#10 » by Odinn21 » Sun Apr 12, 2020 3:59 pm

Colbinii wrote:Don't post discussion in the draft thread.

I was also reserving that post but sure.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,849
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#11 » by Colbinii » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:00 pm

Odinn21 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:Don't post discussion in the draft thread.

I was also reserving that post but sure.


All good, just for future reference then.
O_6
Rookie
Posts: 1,176
And1: 1,583
Joined: Aug 25, 2010

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#12 » by O_6 » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:14 pm

2 hours seems kind of tight, I don't know if it'll make a difference or not but I wouldn't mind pushing it to 3. But I haven't played these games that often so I don't know how fast picks usually get made.
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,283
And1: 7,604
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#13 » by Fadeaway_J » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:21 pm

O_6 wrote:2 hours seems kind of tight, I don't know if it'll make a difference or not but I wouldn't mind pushing it to 3. But I haven't played these games that often so I don't know how fast picks usually get made.

It generally works fine on the T&T board, but I don't know what the pace is like here.

Duncan at #1 has me intrigued already. He's normally picked towards the (upper) middle of the order on the T&T board.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,243
And1: 97,957
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#14 » by Texas Chuck » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:29 pm

Fadeaway_J wrote:
O_6 wrote:2 hours seems kind of tight, I don't know if it'll make a difference or not but I wouldn't mind pushing it to 3. But I haven't played these games that often so I don't know how fast picks usually get made.

It generally works fine on the T&T board, but I don't know what the pace is like here.

Duncan at #1 has me intrigued already. He's normally picked towards the (upper) middle of the order on the T&T board.


4 GOAT candidates available with these rules. Duncan gives you the best value of the 4 in relation to FGA. I think he was a no-brainer. To me the question will be who reaches for Mike.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,406
And1: 5,001
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#15 » by Dutchball97 » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:40 pm

Yeah was a bit surprised how high some here are on Duncan. He's up there but I didn't expect to see him as the first pick.
User avatar
Odinn21
Analyst
Posts: 3,514
And1: 2,942
Joined: May 19, 2019
 

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#16 » by Odinn21 » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:45 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:
O_6 wrote:2 hours seems kind of tight, I don't know if it'll make a difference or not but I wouldn't mind pushing it to 3. But I haven't played these games that often so I don't know how fast picks usually get made.

It generally works fine on the T&T board, but I don't know what the pace is like here.

Duncan at #1 has me intrigued already. He's normally picked towards the (upper) middle of the order on the T&T board.


4 GOAT candidates available with these rules. Duncan gives you the best value of the 4 in relation to FGA. I think he was a no-brainer. To me the question will be who reaches for Mike.

Yeah, Duncan was the best player for 85 fga for 8 players rule. He has peak seasons with not so outrageous fga, he has value seasons. Easy pick.

I'm torn between 2 options, one is way more popular but I'd rather have the other one. Don't know if I should reveal them in here but I need some other thoughts than mine.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Stan
Veteran
Posts: 2,586
And1: 3,966
Joined: Oct 11, 2019

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#17 » by Stan » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:48 pm

Someone's gonna have to fill me in on the specifics of this. What is the 85 FGA format? Is it on some specific site? And Is it strictly calculated by statistical averages/output?
User avatar
Odinn21
Analyst
Posts: 3,514
And1: 2,942
Joined: May 19, 2019
 

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#18 » by Odinn21 » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:54 pm

Stan wrote:Someone's gonna have to fill me in on the specifics of this. What is the 85 FGA format? Is it on some specific site? And Is it strictly calculated by statistical averages/output?

No, it's not on a specific site. It's calculated manually. Though we get help from https://www.basketball-reference.com/ to see averages per seasons.

For example; 1986-87 Magic (16.4 fga) / 1990-91 Jordan (22.4 fga) / 1985-86 Bird (19.6 fga) / 2002-03 Duncan (17.2 fga) / 1966-67 Chamberlain (14.2 fga) combines for 89.8 fga per game. We look for their numbers and calculate the sum manually. Hope that helped. Cheers.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,283
And1: 7,604
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#19 » by Fadeaway_J » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:57 pm

Odinn21 wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
Fadeaway_J wrote:It generally works fine on the T&T board, but I don't know what the pace is like here.

Duncan at #1 has me intrigued already. He's normally picked towards the (upper) middle of the order on the T&T board.


4 GOAT candidates available with these rules. Duncan gives you the best value of the 4 in relation to FGA. I think he was a no-brainer. To me the question will be who reaches for Mike.

Yeah, Duncan was the best player for 85 fga for 8 players rule. He has peak seasons with not so outrageous fga, he has value seasons. Easy pick.

I'm torn between 2 options, one is way more popular but I'd rather have the other one. Don't know if I should reveal them in here but I need some other thoughts than mine.

You can send someone a PM for advice. We avoid discussing unpicked players.
Stan
Veteran
Posts: 2,586
And1: 3,966
Joined: Oct 11, 2019

Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread 

Post#20 » by Stan » Sun Apr 12, 2020 5:02 pm

Odinn21 wrote:
Stan wrote:Someone's gonna have to fill me in on the specifics of this. What is the 85 FGA format? Is it on some specific site? And Is it strictly calculated by statistical averages/output?

No, it's not on a specific site. It's calculated manually. Though we get help from https://www.basketball-reference.com/ to see averages per seasons.

For example; 1986-87 Magic (16.4 fga) / 1990-91 Jordan (22.4 fga) / 1985-86 Bird (19.6 fga) / 2002-03 Duncan (17.2 fga) / 1966-67 Chamberlain (14.2 fga) combines for 89.8 fga per game. We look for their numbers and calculate the sum manually. Hope that helped. Cheers.

That definitely gives me a better picture. But are we determining the winner strictly off of the statistical averages that come out, or are we determining this on other factors that aren't picked up in stats like defense/spacing/how the roster would work together etc?

Return to Player Comparisons