PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,320
- And1: 5,397
- Joined: Nov 16, 2011
PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
The draft thread is at
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1957062
The roster thread is at
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1957068
Thanks, penbeast0
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1957062
The roster thread is at
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=1957068
Thanks, penbeast0
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,849
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Looks promising!
Thanks for doing this Ardee--perfect time for this type of game.
Thanks for doing this Ardee--perfect time for this type of game.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
So the only rules are I know as of now;
1. Seasons from 1976-77 and onwards
2. 85 FGA
But I don't know how many players we're getting. 5? 8? 9? 12? 85 FGA for how many players?
Also, this is my first time participating an all-time fantasy draft on a message board. Do we just post teams right away? Or we follow a serpentine order draft?
1. Seasons from 1976-77 and onwards
2. 85 FGA
But I don't know how many players we're getting. 5? 8? 9? 12? 85 FGA for how many players?
Also, this is my first time participating an all-time fantasy draft on a message board. Do we just post teams right away? Or we follow a serpentine order draft?
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,849
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:So the only rules are I know as of now;
1. Seasons from 1976-77 and onwards
2. 85 FGA
But I don't know how many players we're getting. 5? 8? 9? 12? 85 FGA for how many players?
Also, this is my first time participating an all-time fantasy draft on a message board. Do we just post teams right away? Or we follow a serpentine order draft?
You can start updating your roster once you pick players.
Its ABBABABA order.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 28,283
- And1: 7,604
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:So the only rules are I know as of now;
1. Seasons from 1976-77 and onwards
2. 85 FGA
But I don't know how many players we're getting. 5? 8? 9? 12? 85 FGA for how many players?
Also, this is my first time participating an all-time fantasy draft on a message board. Do we just post teams right away? Or we follow a serpentine order draft?
The full rules are in the draft thread.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,406
- And1: 5,001
- Joined: Mar 28, 2020
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
When you can't be around for your pick, should you PM a list of picks to account for the people that pick before you or do you just send your 1 pick and hope nobody else picks him before you?
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,849
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Dutchball97 wrote:When you can't be around for your pick, should you PM a list of picks to account for the people that pick before you or do you just send your 1 pick and hope nobody else picks him before you?
Send a top 3 to someone after you.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,243
- And1: 97,957
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
70sfan with the pick I hoped he make. Tim Duncan would have been my first choice as well.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,849
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:70sFan wrote:Give me Tim DuncanOdinn21 wrote:...
Did you have to get TD?.. You made me sad man.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Was hoping you'd let TD slip.
(According to time table I have some hours to pick I think?)
Don't post discussion in the draft thread.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Colbinii wrote:Don't post discussion in the draft thread.
I was also reserving that post but sure.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,849
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:Colbinii wrote:Don't post discussion in the draft thread.
I was also reserving that post but sure.
All good, just for future reference then.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,176
- And1: 1,583
- Joined: Aug 25, 2010
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
2 hours seems kind of tight, I don't know if it'll make a difference or not but I wouldn't mind pushing it to 3. But I haven't played these games that often so I don't know how fast picks usually get made.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 28,283
- And1: 7,604
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
O_6 wrote:2 hours seems kind of tight, I don't know if it'll make a difference or not but I wouldn't mind pushing it to 3. But I haven't played these games that often so I don't know how fast picks usually get made.
It generally works fine on the T&T board, but I don't know what the pace is like here.
Duncan at #1 has me intrigued already. He's normally picked towards the (upper) middle of the order on the T&T board.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,243
- And1: 97,957
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Fadeaway_J wrote:O_6 wrote:2 hours seems kind of tight, I don't know if it'll make a difference or not but I wouldn't mind pushing it to 3. But I haven't played these games that often so I don't know how fast picks usually get made.
It generally works fine on the T&T board, but I don't know what the pace is like here.
Duncan at #1 has me intrigued already. He's normally picked towards the (upper) middle of the order on the T&T board.
4 GOAT candidates available with these rules. Duncan gives you the best value of the 4 in relation to FGA. I think he was a no-brainer. To me the question will be who reaches for Mike.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,406
- And1: 5,001
- Joined: Mar 28, 2020
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Yeah was a bit surprised how high some here are on Duncan. He's up there but I didn't expect to see him as the first pick.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Texas Chuck wrote:Fadeaway_J wrote:O_6 wrote:2 hours seems kind of tight, I don't know if it'll make a difference or not but I wouldn't mind pushing it to 3. But I haven't played these games that often so I don't know how fast picks usually get made.
It generally works fine on the T&T board, but I don't know what the pace is like here.
Duncan at #1 has me intrigued already. He's normally picked towards the (upper) middle of the order on the T&T board.
4 GOAT candidates available with these rules. Duncan gives you the best value of the 4 in relation to FGA. I think he was a no-brainer. To me the question will be who reaches for Mike.
Yeah, Duncan was the best player for 85 fga for 8 players rule. He has peak seasons with not so outrageous fga, he has value seasons. Easy pick.
I'm torn between 2 options, one is way more popular but I'd rather have the other one. Don't know if I should reveal them in here but I need some other thoughts than mine.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,586
- And1: 3,966
- Joined: Oct 11, 2019
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Someone's gonna have to fill me in on the specifics of this. What is the 85 FGA format? Is it on some specific site? And Is it strictly calculated by statistical averages/output?
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Stan wrote:Someone's gonna have to fill me in on the specifics of this. What is the 85 FGA format? Is it on some specific site? And Is it strictly calculated by statistical averages/output?
No, it's not on a specific site. It's calculated manually. Though we get help from https://www.basketball-reference.com/ to see averages per seasons.
For example; 1986-87 Magic (16.4 fga) / 1990-91 Jordan (22.4 fga) / 1985-86 Bird (19.6 fga) / 2002-03 Duncan (17.2 fga) / 1966-67 Chamberlain (14.2 fga) combines for 89.8 fga per game. We look for their numbers and calculate the sum manually. Hope that helped. Cheers.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 28,283
- And1: 7,604
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Fadeaway_J wrote:It generally works fine on the T&T board, but I don't know what the pace is like here.
Duncan at #1 has me intrigued already. He's normally picked towards the (upper) middle of the order on the T&T board.
4 GOAT candidates available with these rules. Duncan gives you the best value of the 4 in relation to FGA. I think he was a no-brainer. To me the question will be who reaches for Mike.
Yeah, Duncan was the best player for 85 fga for 8 players rule. He has peak seasons with not so outrageous fga, he has value seasons. Easy pick.
I'm torn between 2 options, one is way more popular but I'd rather have the other one. Don't know if I should reveal them in here but I need some other thoughts than mine.
You can send someone a PM for advice. We avoid discussing unpicked players.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,586
- And1: 3,966
- Joined: Oct 11, 2019
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:Stan wrote:Someone's gonna have to fill me in on the specifics of this. What is the 85 FGA format? Is it on some specific site? And Is it strictly calculated by statistical averages/output?
No, it's not on a specific site. It's calculated manually. Though we get help from https://www.basketball-reference.com/ to see averages per seasons.
For example; 1986-87 Magic (16.4 fga) / 1990-91 Jordan (22.4 fga) / 1985-86 Bird (19.6 fga) / 2002-03 Duncan (17.2 fga) / 1966-67 Chamberlain (14.2 fga) combines for 89.8 fga per game. We look for their numbers and calculate the sum manually. Hope that helped. Cheers.
That definitely gives me a better picture. But are we determining the winner strictly off of the statistical averages that come out, or are we determining this on other factors that aren't picked up in stats like defense/spacing/how the roster would work together etc?