michaelm wrote:Zenzibar wrote:Understand that we're not diminishing the impact viruses have had on lives throughout centuries and advances of medicines to eradicate these.
What was written was awareness that not everyone looked at it with solely benevolent eyes for everyone.
Sure, many questionable things were done in the name of medical ‘science’ in the past, but you can’t even get published now without rigorous ethical approval, and I am fairly confident about current standards in the western world. Syphillis isn’t caused by a virus btw.
I believe vaccination has been of great benefit in first world countries, and the anti vaccination movement here has been associated with deaths from pertussis in infants in places where the vaccination rate is low. People talk of SSPE from measles vaccination but the rate is much higher if you actually get measles to which I remain immune having contracted it as a child in the 60s as everyone did back then. As a medical worker I got vaccinated against Hep B which is pretty much an ethical responsibility, and will get vaccinated against influenza now for similar reasons.
I am not sure what sort of vaccines they are working on for this virus, and don’t have much current knowledge about vaccination in general, but your concerns would perhaps mainly apply to a live attenuated virus, which would presumably be the type of vaccine which would have the longest lead time and require the most testing in regard to safety, and there are as I understand it several other technologies now.
You sound informative, therefore your expertise in the subject matter will be acknowledged.
Let me however ask you, if all current flu vaccine applications are the same across the board?
Or if each vaccine has a batch number and are distributed by the type of health insurance you prescribe to. Just a simple question, that you may be able to further confirm.