ImageImageImageImageImage

The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,013
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#1 » by Chanel Bomber » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:31 pm

... were overrated.

There's obviously a section of Knicks fans that still believes the Melo trade was a mistake and/or that the team would've been better off without him. We can debate that (although that horse's been beaten to death) but that's not really my point here. While I loved that team with Stoudemire, Gallinari, Chandler, Fields and Felton, it is in my opinion strangely romanticized as some sort of flashback to the 1970s Knicks, when in reality they were just barely above-average.

First of all, this group was only two wins over .500 when the trade happened. They had a nice stretch to start the season but they were not exactly revolutionizing the game. Secondly, and more importantly, their careers were ravaged by injuries soon thereafter. Which means that their record at the time was probably their peak as a collective.

- Stoudemire's knees were a ticking time bomb. First he hurt his back in the 2011 playoffs, gained weight in the offseason, hurt his back again and then hurt his knee the following year. He was never the same after those injuries. In fact, he was a liability whenever he played once he came back. 0 All-Star appearance.

- Gallinari tore his ACL in 2013, missed the playoffs, and missed the entire 2013-14 season. He has never played a full season since, and even though he's been a very good NBA player, he forever lost his mobility and never reached his potential because of those injuries. 0 All-Star appearance.

- Chandler only played 8 games in 2011-12 and 43 games in 2012-13. His career was also plagued by injury problems. His last season with the Knicks turned out to be the peak of his career. 0 All-Star appearance.

- Landry Fields came back down to Earth after what was just a fluky hot start. He became an overpaid scrub for Toronto after leaving the Knicks. His career ended after only 5 seasons (which I guess is a nice career for a second-round pick). 0 All-Star appearance.

So this wasn't actually a foundation. Building around those guys would've been like building on quick sand. It was not sustainable. That team was cool but looking back, they were more like an optical illusion. There was no All-Star there, just room for further heartbreak.

What's worse is that you can say, the Knicks would've been bad so they could've tanked. Well, 2012 was the AD-Lillard draft but the Knicks would've probably ended up in the 8 to 10 range under Mike D'Antoni with Amar'e (still) playing with a bad back and a (still) healthy Gallinari. We would've been bad the next two seasons, but those were horrible draft classes (the Anthony Bennett draft and the Andrew Wiggins draft) with no franchise players with the exception of Giannis and Embiid. The only reasonable chance at drafting a franchise player considering (or assuming) the circumstances would've been Embiid, and I'm not sure the Knicks would've made that commitment after the Amar'e fiasco.

This is not an endorsement of the Melo trade (although I still think it was the right move) as much as it is intended as a reality check on the pre-Melo Knicks. That team would've never given us the 2012-13 season.

Sorry, I'm bored.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,853
And1: 45,458
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#2 » by GONYK » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:33 pm

God bless anyone who has the energy for this debate in 2020 :lol:
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 94,780
And1: 135,805
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#3 » by 3toheadmelo » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:35 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:... were overrated.

There's obviously a section of Knicks fans that still believes the Melo trade was a mistake and/or that the team would've been better off without him. We can debate that (although that horse's been beaten to death) but that's not really my point here. While I loved that team with Stoudemire, Gallinari, Chandler, Fields and Felton, it is in my opinion strangely romanticized as some sort of flashback to the 1970s Knicks, when in reality they were just barely above-average.

First of all, this group was only two wins over .500 when the trade happened. They had a nice stretch to start the season but they were not exactly revolutionizing the game. Secondly, and more importantly, their careers were ravaged by injuries soon thereafter. Which means that their record at the time was probably their peak as a collective.

- Stoudemire's knees were a ticking time bomb. First he hurt his back in the 2011 playoffs, gained weight in the offseason, hurt his back again and then hurt his knee the following year. He was never the same after those injuries. In fact, he was a liability whenever he played once he came back. 0 All-Star appearance.

- Gallinari tore his ACL in 2013, missed the playoffs, and missed the entire 2013-14 season. He has never played a full season since, and even though he's been a very good NBA player, he forever lost his mobility and never reached his potential because of those injuries. 0 All-Star appearance.

- Chandler only played 8 games in 2011-12 and 43 games in 2012-13. His career was also plagued by injury problems. His last season with the Knicks turned out to be the peak of his career. 0 All-Star appearance.

- Landry Fields came back down to Earth after what was just a fluky hot start. He became an overpaid scrub for Toronto after leaving the Knicks. His career ended after only 5 seasons (which I guess is a nice career for a second-round pick). 0 All-Star appearance.

So this wasn't actually a foundation. Building around those guys would've been like building on quick sand. It was not sustainable. That team was cool but looking back, they were more like an optical illusion. There was no All-Star there, just room for further heartbreak.

What's worse is that you can say, the Knicks would've been bad so they could've tanked. Well, 2012 was the AD-Lillard draft but the Knicks would've probably ended up in the 8 to 10 range under Mike D'Antoni with Amar'e (still) playing with a bad back and a (still) healthy Gallinari. We would've been bad the next two seasons, but those were horrible draft classes (the Anthony Bennett draft and the Andrew Wiggins draft) with no franchise players with the exception of Giannis and Embiid. The only reasonable chance at drafting a franchise player considering (or assuming) the circumstances would've been Embiid, and I'm not sure the Knicks would've made that commitment after the Amar'e fiasco.

This is not an endorsement of the Melo trade (although I still think it was the right move) as much as it is intended as a reality check on the pre-Melo Knicks. That team would've never given us the 2012-13 season.

Sorry, I'm bored.

Image
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,013
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#4 » by Chanel Bomber » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:36 pm

GONYK wrote:God bless anyone who has the energy for this debate in 2020 :lol:

My bad, I didn't mean to start a conversation about the Melo trade (which I know has been discussed over and over), but rather focus on the alternate universe where the trade doesn't happen. Maybe it's been done ad nauseam before I joined.

Again, I'm bored :lol:
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,853
And1: 45,458
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#5 » by GONYK » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:39 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:
GONYK wrote:God bless anyone who has the energy for this debate in 2020 :lol:

My bad, I didn't mean to start a conversation about the Melo trade (which I know has been discussed over and over), but rather focus on the alternate universe where the trade doesn't happen. Maybe it's been done ad nauseam before I joined.

Again, I'm bored :lol:


No worries man. I have no problem with what you intend for this thread.

It just made me chuckle because there was a time when this was a holy blood war. I read your post now, and just realized that was 10 years ago and now I feel nothing. :lol:

Maybe the loss of passion will allow the topic to actually be discussed.
User avatar
Kampuchea
RealGM
Posts: 11,302
And1: 9,231
Joined: Oct 20, 2010
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrFOb_f7ubw
       

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#6 » by Kampuchea » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:40 pm

I think Landry Fields went down the drain when his wrist was injured?
Image
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 137,763
And1: 135,994
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#7 » by god shammgod » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:43 pm

i saw the title and said out loud "oh no" lol
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,752
And1: 12,706
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#8 » by Phish Tank » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:54 pm

god shammgod wrote:i saw the title and said out loud "oh no" lol


:lol:

honestly half the people that woulda flamed this debate are already banned or "retired"
Image
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,170
And1: 62,279
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#9 » by HarthorneWingo » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:54 pm

GONYK wrote:God bless anyone who has the energy for this debate in 2020 :lol:


I just can't anymore. :lol:
Free Palestine
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,170
And1: 62,279
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#10 » by HarthorneWingo » Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:55 pm

Phish Tank wrote:
god shammgod wrote:i saw the title and said out loud "oh no" lol


:lol:

honestly half the people that woulda flamed this debate are already banned or "retired"


And self-banned. :lol:
Free Palestine
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 89,721
And1: 109,275
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#11 » by Capn'O » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:05 pm

That team wasn't going anywhere of importance but I wanted the team to build incrementally and coherently. If we were gonna make a big trade, make it to complement Stat and Mike D. As it turned out, Stat fell off physically pretty quickly so that was unlikely to yield much either. The Stat signing was killer and Joe Johnson and Melo may have actually fit better. Go figure. But what can you do when a third of your cap is dead weight?

Obv. Melo via free agency would have been sweet but probably impossible.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,234
And1: 26,112
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#12 » by Clyde Frazier » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:25 pm

GONYK wrote:God bless anyone who has the energy for this debate in 2020 :lol:


Can't speak for other fanbases, but it's incredible how much we fixate on specific moves (however minute) even 15-20 years later. Probably has something to do with the lack of winning, but our fanbase is insane in that regard and I love it :lol:
User avatar
Clyde Frazier
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,234
And1: 26,112
Joined: Sep 07, 2010

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#13 » by Clyde Frazier » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:32 pm

Yeah, if Chandler and Gallo went on to have healthy careers the melo trade stings *much* more. Gallo especially had the potential to be a special offensive player. But yeah, the melo haters are obsessed with overrating that team and the Lin run. I wanted Lin back but they glorify guys like JARED **** JEFFRIES in the process. Awful.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,229
And1: 25,675
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#14 » by moocow007 » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:45 pm

The Melo trade was a mistake in the sense that the Knicks could not build a team around Melo except that one season where if not for a crazy hot Pacer team they could have knocked out the "Big 3" in Miami in the playoffs. Just like the Dantoni team was a mistake in the sense that Melo cleary did not fit that team but the two were forced into a marriage that was clearly doomed ftom the start.

The bottom line is the Knicks front office has continued to horribly fail at building any sort of a ream for well over 20 years now. Not enough talent. Players that didn't fit each other. Players that didnt fit the coach and vice versa. Personalities across the board (not just players, but coaches, front office execs) that were more interested in their own security and happiness than that of the team.

No plan. No skill.. Changing directions at the drop of a hat. Chasing fantasies. Clueless, clueless, clueless!!! Wasting years. Wasting decades.

Ever since and starting with the Ewing trade (21+ years ago) Its been an unmitigated disaster. Should have realized that the Knicks of the 1990's were coming to an end and looked to rest by trading Ewing to Portland in a package centered around the young and talented Jermaine Oneal and picks (as was rumored), instead of believing that they were still an elite team and trading Ewing for an over the hill Glen Rice and a whole bunch of overpriced vets.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,013
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#15 » by Chanel Bomber » Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:56 pm

Clyde Frazier wrote:
GONYK wrote:God bless anyone who has the energy for this debate in 2020 :lol:


Can't speak for other fanbases, but it's incredible how much we fixate on specific moves (however minute) even 15-20 years later. Probably has something to do with the lack of winning, but our fanbase is insane in that regard and I love it :lol:

We're assuredly the only fanbase that is entirely composed of romantics.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 89,721
And1: 109,275
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#16 » by Capn'O » Mon Apr 13, 2020 11:22 pm

moocow007 wrote:The Melo trade was a mistake in the sense that the Knicks could not build a team around Melo except that one season where if not for a crazy hot Pacer team they could have knocked out the "Big 3" in Miami in the playoffs. Just like the Dantoni team was a mistake in the sense that Melo cleary did not fit that team but the two were forced into a marriage that was clearly doomed ftom the start.

The bottom line is the Knicks front office has continued to horribly fail at building any sort of a ream for well over 20 years now. Not enough talent. Players that didn't fit each other. Players that didnt fit the coach and vice versa. Personalities across the board (not just players, but coaches, front office execs) that were more interested in their own security and happiness than that of the team.

No plan. No skill.. Changing directions at the drop of a hat. Chasing fantasies. Clueless, clueless, clueless!!! Wasting years. Wasting decades.

Ever since and starting with the Ewing trade (21+ years ago) Its been an unmitigated disaster.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app


The Moo of Old was a Defender of Good Players who were miscast in this mess. That was fair, and I respect it.

But current "**** this Franchise Moo" is a lot of fun. Two sides of the same coin, I suppose.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,752
And1: 12,706
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#17 » by Phish Tank » Tue Apr 14, 2020 12:10 am

moocow007 wrote:The Melo trade was a mistake in the sense that the Knicks could not build a team around Melo except that one season where if not for a crazy hot Pacer team they could have knocked out the "Big 3" in Miami in the playoffs. Just like the Dantoni team was a mistake in the sense that Melo cleary did not fit that team but the two were forced into a marriage that was clearly doomed ftom the start.

The bottom line is the Knicks front office has continued to horribly fail at building any sort of a ream for well over 20 years now. Not enough talent. Players that didn't fit each other. Players that didnt fit the coach and vice versa. Personalities across the board (not just players, but coaches, front office execs) that were more interested in their own security and happiness than that of the team.

No plan. No skill.. Changing directions at the drop of a hat. Chasing fantasies. Clueless, clueless, clueless!!! Wasting years. Wasting decades.

Ever since and starting with the Ewing trade (21+ years ago) Its been an unmitigated disaster.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app


funny thing about it is that one of Donnie Walsh's fatal moves as Knicks' prez was probably hiring D'Antoni to bridge the team between 2008 to the year of Bron
Image
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,752
And1: 12,706
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#18 » by Phish Tank » Tue Apr 14, 2020 12:11 am

Capn'O wrote:
moocow007 wrote:The Melo trade was a mistake in the sense that the Knicks could not build a team around Melo except that one season where if not for a crazy hot Pacer team they could have knocked out the "Big 3" in Miami in the playoffs. Just like the Dantoni team was a mistake in the sense that Melo cleary did not fit that team but the two were forced into a marriage that was clearly doomed ftom the start.

The bottom line is the Knicks front office has continued to horribly fail at building any sort of a ream for well over 20 years now. Not enough talent. Players that didn't fit each other. Players that didnt fit the coach and vice versa. Personalities across the board (not just players, but coaches, front office execs) that were more interested in their own security and happiness than that of the team.

No plan. No skill.. Changing directions at the drop of a hat. Chasing fantasies. Clueless, clueless, clueless!!! Wasting years. Wasting decades.

Ever since and starting with the Ewing trade (21+ years ago) Its been an unmitigated disaster.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app


The Moo of Old was a Defender of Good Players who were miscast in this mess. That was fair, and I respect it.

But current "**** this Franchise Moo" is a lot of fun. Two sides of the same coin, I suppose.


I miss Moo banhammering people.... like the dk7ths of the world
Image
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 89,721
And1: 109,275
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#19 » by Capn'O » Tue Apr 14, 2020 1:44 am

Phish Tank wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
moocow007 wrote:The Melo trade was a mistake in the sense that the Knicks could not build a team around Melo except that one season where if not for a crazy hot Pacer team they could have knocked out the "Big 3" in Miami in the playoffs. Just like the Dantoni team was a mistake in the sense that Melo cleary did not fit that team but the two were forced into a marriage that was clearly doomed ftom the start.

The bottom line is the Knicks front office has continued to horribly fail at building any sort of a ream for well over 20 years now. Not enough talent. Players that didn't fit each other. Players that didnt fit the coach and vice versa. Personalities across the board (not just players, but coaches, front office execs) that were more interested in their own security and happiness than that of the team.

No plan. No skill.. Changing directions at the drop of a hat. Chasing fantasies. Clueless, clueless, clueless!!! Wasting years. Wasting decades.

Ever since and starting with the Ewing trade (21+ years ago) Its been an unmitigated disaster.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app


The Moo of Old was a Defender of Good Players who were miscast in this mess. That was fair, and I respect it.

But current "**** this Franchise Moo" is a lot of fun. Two sides of the same coin, I suppose.


I miss Moo banhammering people.... like the dk7ths of the world


The TS% Avenger!
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,170
And1: 62,279
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: The pre-Melo Mike D'Antoni Knicks 

Post#20 » by HarthorneWingo » Tue Apr 14, 2020 3:42 am

Capn'O wrote:That team wasn't going anywhere of importance but I wanted the team to build incrementally and coherently. If we were gonna make a big trade, make it to complement Stat and Mike D. As it turned out, Stat fell off physically pretty quickly so that was unlikely to yield much either. The Stat signing was killer and Joe Johnson and Melo may have actually fit better. Go figure. But what can you do when a third of your cap is dead weight?

Obv. Melo via free agency would have been sweet but probably impossible.


You gotta play hardball with Leon. Melo was too interested in his “brand” to go to The Nyets. It would’ve been interesting to see how that played out if we didn’t make that trade. He could’ve negotiated an opt-out in a couple years, keep our team in tact, and go from there. Melo could then renegotiate his max contract at that time.
Free Palestine

Return to New York Knicks