PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
SHAQ32
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,657
- And1: 3,321
- Joined: Mar 21, 2013
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
I might be reaching with my next pick. But it's purely for fit.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 92,763
- And1: 99,298
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
SHAQ32 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:Odinn21 wrote:Mate, I guess you don't get to pick your 3rd player right away. And should edit your post.
He should be allowed to change his pick too imo in case them being a package deal was important to him. And yes I might be saying this part because I want one of those guys.No, but seriously he should be allowed to switch it if it changes things for him.
I'm cool with this. I'll hold off on drafting until he comes back.
You are a good dude.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
SHAQ32
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,657
- And1: 3,321
- Joined: Mar 21, 2013
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Texas Chuck wrote:SHAQ32 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:
He should be allowed to change his pick too imo in case them being a package deal was important to him. And yes I might be saying this part because I want one of those guys.No, but seriously he should be allowed to switch it if it changes things for him.
I'm cool with this. I'll hold off on drafting until he comes back.
You are a good dude.
Hey, thanks brutha!
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Laimbeer
- RealGM
- Posts: 43,100
- And1: 15,165
- Joined: Aug 12, 2009
- Location: Cabin Creek
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Whoa, that Embiid pick. Much higher than he'd go in T&T, if he was drafted at all. Interesting to see the differences.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,971
- And1: 16,439
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
70sFan wrote:
The order is ABBABABA which means you only get one pick right now (Kidd) and then we go back to the bottom of the order for Round 3. In Round 4 though it will snake around and you will make 2 picks though.
Shaq32 wrote:Up
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Texas Chuck wrote:He should be allowed to change his pick too imo in case them being a package deal was important to him. And yes I might be saying this part because I want one of those guys.No, but seriously he should be allowed to switch it if it changes things for him.
Yeah, I think making him stick with one of his 2 selections wouldn't be nice. He picked those two while thinking he had 2 consecutive picks and covered many areas accordingly so.
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Doctor MJ
- Senior Mod

- Posts: 53,776
- And1: 22,688
- Joined: Mar 10, 2005
- Location: Cali
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Laimbeer wrote:Whoa, that Embiid pick. Much higher than he'd go in T&T, if he was drafted at all. Interesting to see the differences.
I'm glad it surprised people. I actually had zeroed in on Embiid considerably earlier on and was really wondering how far on or off people's radar he was. I thought he might be pretty far off.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Fadeaway_J
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 28,648
- And1: 7,678
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:He should be allowed to change his pick too imo in case them being a package deal was important to him. And yes I might be saying this part because I want one of those guys.No, but seriously he should be allowed to switch it if it changes things for him.
Yeah, I think making him stick with one of his 2 selections wouldn't be nice. He picked those two while thinking he had 2 consecutive picks and covered many areas accordingly so.
We can't wait for him indefinitely though. What if he's gone to bed?
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Fadeaway_J wrote:Odinn21 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:He should be allowed to change his pick too imo in case them being a package deal was important to him. And yes I might be saying this part because I want one of those guys.No, but seriously he should be allowed to switch it if it changes things for him.
Yeah, I think making him stick with one of his 2 selections wouldn't be nice. He picked those two while thinking he had 2 consecutive picks and covered many areas accordingly so.
We can't wait for him indefinitely though. What if he's gone to bed?
I warned him 4 minutes after his vote. Let's give him 29-30 more minutes to change his vote (2 hours in total), if he doesn't he'll get Kidd and the draft will continue with SHAQ32's vote.
How does that sound?
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,971
- And1: 16,439
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
After 2 hours just stick him with Kidd who he announced first and is the better value pick in my opinion
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Fadeaway_J
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 28,648
- And1: 7,678
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Odinn21 wrote:Fadeaway_J wrote:Odinn21 wrote:Yeah, I think making him stick with one of his 2 selections wouldn't be nice. He picked those two while thinking he had 2 consecutive picks and covered many areas accordingly so.
We can't wait for him indefinitely though. What if he's gone to bed?
I warned him 4 minutes after his vote. Let's give him 29-30 more minutes to change his vote (2 hours in total), if he doesn't he'll get Kidd and the draft will continue with SHAQ32's vote.
How does that sound?
Fine by me.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Odinn21
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,514
- And1: 2,942
- Joined: May 19, 2019
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Fadeaway_J wrote:Odinn21 wrote:Fadeaway_J wrote:We can't wait for him indefinitely though. What if he's gone to bed?
I warned him 4 minutes after his vote. Let's give him 29-30 more minutes to change his vote (2 hours in total), if he doesn't he'll get Kidd and the draft will continue with SHAQ32's vote.
How does that sound?
Fine by me.
If it's OK with ardee as well; It's been 2 hours since 70sFan's vote. He gets Kidd and the draft continues with SHAQ32's vote.
ardee wrote:...
70sFan wrote:...
SHAQ32 wrote:...
The issue with per75 numbers;
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
36pts on 27 fga/9 fta in 36 mins, does this mean he'd keep up the efficiency to get 48pts on 36fga/12fta in 48 mins?
The answer; NO. He's human, not a linearly working machine.
Per75 is efficiency rate, not actual production.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Dr Positivity
- RealGM
- Posts: 62,971
- And1: 16,439
- Joined: Apr 29, 2009
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Don't need to wait for ardee's approval. Just move on if Shaq's here.
It's going to be a glorious day... I feel my luck could change
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
ardee
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,320
- And1: 5,397
- Joined: Nov 16, 2011
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
70s should keep whoever he drafted first. Move on to Shaq and then Fade if he's gone to bed.
Sent from my SM-A505F using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my SM-A505F using RealGM mobile app
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
Fadeaway_J
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 28,648
- And1: 7,678
- Joined: Jul 25, 2016
- Location: Kingston, Jamaica
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Agonised between two players, but this is around the time when wing defenders tend to start flying off the board so...
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- MisterHibachi
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,657
- And1: 19,075
- Joined: Oct 06, 2013
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Robinson/PG/Kobe is a pretty insane combo.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
-
70sFan
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,220
- And1: 25,489
- Joined: Aug 11, 2015
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
My bad, sorry guys. It was a late in the night, I waited only to make my picks and totally forgot that I didn't have two straight picks... 
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Jaivl
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,143
- And1: 6,791
- Joined: Jan 28, 2014
- Location: A Coruña, Spain
- Contact:
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
70sFan wrote:My bad, sorry guys. It was a late in the night, I waited only to make my picks and totally forgot that I didn't have two straight picks...
Isn't this a snake draft? You had two straight picks... right?
EDIT: alright, I see the format
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 92,763
- And1: 99,298
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
O_6 just sniped me.
Great pick in Draymond.
Great pick in Draymond.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
- MisterHibachi
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,657
- And1: 19,075
- Joined: Oct 06, 2013
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: PC Board Post-Merger Draft - Discussion Thread
Too bad Elgin Baylor doesn't qualify or else Laimbeer could've had the 60s Jordan, the 70s Jordan, and Jordan Jordan.
"He looked like Batman coming out of nowhere"





