WWE Raw Discussion III
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,481
- And1: 2,968
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Kinda like Cedric and Ricochet as a team. Seen on Twitter that they're calling themselves "2 Fly." Got a nice ring to it.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,922
- And1: 3,007
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Too good actually. Watch WWE mess that name up.
Baffled why Flair called up Shirai. Heel vs heel is ok wrestling wise but for storyline I dunno. Don't feed Io to Charlotte!
Baffled why Flair called up Shirai. Heel vs heel is ok wrestling wise but for storyline I dunno. Don't feed Io to Charlotte!
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
The_Brecht
- Starter
- Posts: 2,208
- And1: 966
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Dominater wrote:The_Brecht wrote:Better not win feuds, because you will not get in the title picture.
Atleast theyre getting the Rollins shot out of the way now
Yeah, I realize Rollins was probably the only real heel possibility they had for a feud with Drew.
On the other hand, Seth is going to lose two major feuds in a row. That's the end of the messiah angle then?
I would've liked a series of matches like last week against the Big Show. A little Cena US Championship challenge angle. Keep Drew strong en get other talent over. Have Seth build his character back up after his loss against KO by going up the ladder, so his cult only gets stronger. Then you have him think he can take the whole show over and go after Drew.
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- Dominator83
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,220
- And1: 32,494
- Joined: Jan 16, 2005
- Location: NBA Hell
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
The_Brecht wrote:Dominater wrote:The_Brecht wrote:Better not win feuds, because you will not get in the title picture.
Atleast theyre getting the Rollins shot out of the way now
Yeah, I realize Rollins was probably the only real heel possibility they had for a feud with Drew.
On the other hand, Seth is going to lose two major feuds in a row. That's the end of the messiah angle then?
I would've liked a series of matches like last week against the Big Show. A little Cena US Championship challenge angle. Keep Drew strong en get other talent over. Have Seth build his character back up after his loss against KO by going up the ladder, so his cult only gets stronger. Then you have him think he can take the whole show over and go after Drew.
That's exactly what they should do. If Drew is gonna get over as a champion, gotta book him like Russo/WCW booked Booker T when he got the belt in 2000. A fighting champion that takes on all comers
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..
For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
Ruzious
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,582
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
tugs wrote:Excited for this stable with Almas, Garza, and Theory. Not a fan of the fist bump though
And how far they go might fall on Zelina Vega's tiny shoulders. She's been doing a nice job managing them 1 at a time, but now she's got all 3 under her wing as their mouthpiece. Hopefully she can step up into this bigger role.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
Ruzious
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,582
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
iMoreland wrote:Kinda like Cedric and Ricochet as a team. Seen on Twitter that they're calling themselves "2 Fly." Got a nice ring to it.
It seems like they're trying to find a role for MVP... why not have him be their manager? Of course, eventually he'd turn on them with a team from NXT.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
daoneandonly
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,138
- And1: 4,190
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
tugs wrote:Too good actually. Watch WWE mess that name up.
Baffled why Flair called up Shirai. Heel vs heel is ok wrestling wise but for storyline I dunno. Don't feed Io to Charlotte!
I saw an article that said apparently WWE officials view Charlotte as a face. Dont see the NXT faithful following that thought process
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
The_Brecht
- Starter
- Posts: 2,208
- And1: 966
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Some things never change.
At this point, her theme song could be "I injure most girls."

At this point, her theme song could be "I injure most girls."

West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- Stanford
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 53,672
- And1: 18,919
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
The_Brecht wrote:Some things never change.
At this point, her theme song could be "I injure most girls."
Was she injured here?
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
improper
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Just goes to show... doesn't matter how unskilled you are. If you're related to Rock you've got a WWE job for life.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- WRau1
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,948
- And1: 5,156
- Joined: Apr 30, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
God, Nia Jax is such a terrible professional wrestler.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
Ruzious
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,582
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
The_Brecht wrote:Some things never change.
At this point, her theme song could be "I injure most girls."
Seems like Nia is trying to work social media to take advantage of that smooth move - trying to build up for a match with Rhonda Rousey. Maybe it was her idea, maybe it was WWE's. Either way, I have no interest in watching Jax perform. https://www.wrestlinginc.com/news/2020/04/nia-jax-calls-out-ronda-rousey-on-twitter-again-669494/
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- Stanford
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 53,672
- And1: 18,919
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
It's so **** uncomfortable watching fans talk about the technical aspects of the wresting when they've never performed it.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
Spens1
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,879
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
I mean if Nia Jax didn't have a history of injuring people i'd give her the benefit of the doubt, honestly, either release her cause she's frankly rubbish as a monster (i mean she isn't strong, lets face it, she struggles to lift women who are about 100 lbs) and incredibly sloppy and dangerous in the ring or send her back to NXT to make sure she isn't a danger to anyone else or herself.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
The_Brecht
- Starter
- Posts: 2,208
- And1: 966
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Stanford wrote:
Was she injured here?[/quote]
Thankfully not.
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
The_Brecht
- Starter
- Posts: 2,208
- And1: 966
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Spens1 wrote:I mean if Nia Jax didn't have a history of injuring people i'd give her the benefit of the doubt, honestly, either release her cause she's frankly rubbish as a monster (i mean she isn't strong, lets face it, she struggles to lift women who are about 100 lbs) and incredibly sloppy and dangerous in the ring or send her back to NXT to make sure she isn't a danger to anyone else or herself.
I completely agree.
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,922
- And1: 3,007
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Really can't buy the monster character when she's donning a dolled up look and being bitchy and mean girly. I don't get it.
Association to Bliss somehow hurt her
Association to Bliss somehow hurt her
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,922
- And1: 3,007
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Man, no one's getting behind that. They're lucky no live audience will boo their ****daoneandonly wrote:tugs wrote:Too good actually. Watch WWE mess that name up.
Baffled why Flair called up Shirai. Heel vs heel is ok wrestling wise but for storyline I dunno. Don't feed Io to Charlotte!
I saw an article that said apparently WWE officials view Charlotte as a face. Dont see the NXT faithful following that thought process
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,922
- And1: 3,007
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
Oh yeah she's amazing as a manager, and credit to those 3, allowing her to build them up and not do too much (except for Theory with that backstage segment once).Ruzious wrote:tugs wrote:Excited for this stable with Almas, Garza, and Theory. Not a fan of the fist bump though
And how far they go might fall on Zelina Vega's tiny shoulders. She's been doing a nice job managing them 1 at a time, but now she's got all 3 under her wing as their mouthpiece. Hopefully she can step up into this bigger role.
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
-
jakecronus8
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,798
- And1: 8,194
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
-
Re: WWE Raw Discussion III
If all things are the exact same, except Nia isn’t related to the Anoa’i family, what are the chances she’s employed by wwe?
For the life of me I don’t see what she brings to the table. No charisma, no athleticism, sloppy, reckless, can’t cut a promo. She’s instant change the channel heat with me.
Many are speculating that this whole thing with her being an unsafe wrestler is all part of a work. If that’s the case then WWE is heading down a PG Russo rabbit hole. There’s no need to blur the lines of reality and kayfabe. Everyone that still watches their product is aware that it’s not real. There’s no end game here for anyone that involves getting someone over.
For Nia’s sake, I do hope it’s a work. If not, the receipts are coming. Right now she’s protected, but eventually the company will sour on her and once that happens it’s gonna be a battle field. You can’t consistently hurt respected workers and then display a “lol” attitude about it without repercussions. To be honest, her getting potatoed would be just about the only allure of watching a Nia Jax match.
For the life of me I don’t see what she brings to the table. No charisma, no athleticism, sloppy, reckless, can’t cut a promo. She’s instant change the channel heat with me.
Many are speculating that this whole thing with her being an unsafe wrestler is all part of a work. If that’s the case then WWE is heading down a PG Russo rabbit hole. There’s no need to blur the lines of reality and kayfabe. Everyone that still watches their product is aware that it’s not real. There’s no end game here for anyone that involves getting someone over.
For Nia’s sake, I do hope it’s a work. If not, the receipts are coming. Right now she’s protected, but eventually the company will sour on her and once that happens it’s gonna be a battle field. You can’t consistently hurt respected workers and then display a “lol” attitude about it without repercussions. To be honest, her getting potatoed would be just about the only allure of watching a Nia Jax match.
Do it for Chuck




