Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,654
And1: 27,322
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#941 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 9:38 pm

NBAFan93 wrote:This is interesting. I guess it’s played out that asthma really isn’t as bad of a risk factor as anticipated, and that even otherwise healthy obese people are at a higher risk. Overweight Americans should really be working on losing weight ASAP if they weren’t before.

https://news.yahoo.com/covid-19-risk-factors-hint-at-how-pandemic-will-play-out-124657256.html


Diet starts tomorrow?
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,191
And1: 5,227
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#942 » by michaelm » Wed Apr 22, 2020 9:51 pm

DowJones wrote:I really wish our media here in the states wasn't so political with this virus. One side of the political aisle is attacking Fauci and the other side appears to now be attacking Birx, claiming she is losing credibility. They are both extremely good at their jobs--let's let them give advice.

As an outside observer this seems very true. I have been watching snippets of both Fox and Friends and CNN (not for extended periods, there are limits to my curiosity) and both seem agenda driven, and more interested in praising or criticising Trump’s handling of the crisis than in what is actually transpiring.
User avatar
Kabookalu
RealGM
Posts: 63,103
And1: 70,115
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Long Beach, California

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#943 » by Kabookalu » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:31 pm

michaelm wrote:
DowJones wrote:I really wish our media here in the states wasn't so political with this virus. One side of the political aisle is attacking Fauci and the other side appears to now be attacking Birx, claiming she is losing credibility. They are both extremely good at their jobs--let's let them give advice.

As an outside observer this seems very true. I have been watching snippets of both Fox and Friends and CNN (not for extended periods, there are limits to my curiosity) and both seem agenda driven, and more interested in praising or criticising Trump’s handling of the crisis than in what is actually transpiring.


I don't watch CNN for the same reason I don't ESPN. They take objective information, and manipulate it in a way to make you feel an emotion, because that's how you grab an audience's attention, by making them feel something through your storytelling. They'll take the big picture, and then selectively take bits and pieces of it to form a narrative. CNN is explicit with this, but not to the extent of Fox who might as well be considered state propaganda.

All that being said I don't see how anyone informed on this can say that Trump's handling of this has been anything short of a disaster. There's a whole laundry list to go through, but stealing medical supplies from states, and selling them to private companies, who pit states against each other in a bidding war so they can buy something they already paid for, is the most irresponsible act I've ever seen a president commit in my lifetime. The states are all out here fending for themselves with little help of the federal government.
Read on Twitter
NBAFan93
RealGM
Posts: 19,792
And1: 14,223
Joined: Dec 04, 2016

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#944 » by NBAFan93 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:44 pm

Kabookalu wrote:
michaelm wrote:
DowJones wrote:I really wish our media here in the states wasn't so political with this virus. One side of the political aisle is attacking Fauci and the other side appears to now be attacking Birx, claiming she is losing credibility. They are both extremely good at their jobs--let's let them give advice.

As an outside observer this seems very true. I have been watching snippets of both Fox and Friends and CNN (not for extended periods, there are limits to my curiosity) and both seem agenda driven, and more interested in praising or criticising Trump’s handling of the crisis than in what is actually transpiring.


I don't watch CNN for the same reason I don't ESPN. They take objective information, and manipulate it in a way to make you feel an emotion, because that's how you grab an audience's attention, by making them feel something through your storytelling. They'll take the big picture, and then selectively take bits and pieces of it to form a narrative. CNN is explicit with this, but not to the extent of Fox who might as well be considered state propaganda.

All that being said I don't see how anyone informed on this can say that Trump's handling of this has been anything short of a disaster. There's a whole laundry list to go through, but stealing medical supplies from states, and selling them to private companies, who pit states against each other in a bidding war so they can buy something they already paid for, is the most irresponsible act I've ever seen a president commit in my lifetime. The states are all out here fending for themselves with little help of the federal government.



I wasn’t aware he did the bolded. That’s awful if true.

When I watch Trump he seems like someone flying by the seat of their pants during a completely awful situation - but at the same time having to deal w/ an unprecedentedly hostile press that wants to accuse and blame him for everything cause they have an obvious agenda. I honestly want to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he’s doing the best he can and genuinely wants to do the right thing.

Plus I’m not convinced any of the other leaders can and would have done a better job either. Not like all kinds of Democrats were screaming these genious plans filled w/ foresight re: stopping the virus in January or February, were they?

I wish the media would stop being so agenda driven and actually just do objective reporting like they used to. And both sides would start working together and stop being so accusatory and nasty. People put this partisan **** aside for at least a little bit during 9/11 - sad they don’t seem willing to do that now.
NBAFan93
RealGM
Posts: 19,792
And1: 14,223
Joined: Dec 04, 2016

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#945 » by NBAFan93 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 10:53 pm

michaelm wrote:
DowJones wrote:I really wish our media here in the states wasn't so political with this virus. One side of the political aisle is attacking Fauci and the other side appears to now be attacking Birx, claiming she is losing credibility. They are both extremely good at their jobs--let's let them give advice.

As an outside observer this seems very true. I have been watching snippets of both Fox and Friends and CNN (not for extended periods, there are limits to my curiosity) and both seem agenda driven, and more interested in praising or criticising Trump’s handling of the crisis than in what is actually transpiring.


100% this. It’s so hard to get objective news and I find it very frustrating as I actually want to learn more. Sometimes yahoo has some articles that aren’t agenda driven - but those are really rare. Local news isn’t as bad w/ the partisan stuff, but fear and shock is their primary goal and that stuff can be bad too.
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 16,541
And1: 7,558
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#946 » by DowJones » Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:00 pm

I don't think anyone would say Trump has handled this great. I do think his decision to restrict travel from China was a great one and it saved many American lives. I am not entirely sure what Democrats would have done. I know that Biden flatly said he would not have restricted travel with China. Nancy Pelosi and Andrew Cuomo were telling the citizens of San Francisco and NY to go out and enjoy life as late as the end of February/early March. Those are arguably the 3 leading Democrats in America today, so if they are any indication I don't see how much would be different.

I go back to Italy. That is what killed us. It looks like our country did a good job of slowing the spread from Asia, as evidenced by the numbers in western states like Washington and California. It was the travel between America and Italy that really hurt us and I don't think anyone saw that coming.
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 16,541
And1: 7,558
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#947 » by DowJones » Wed Apr 22, 2020 11:47 pm

I also think America's "testing failure" is dramatically overblown. America has run 4.32 million. The next closest country is Germany at 2.07 million. Italy is next at 1.51 million. Now let's take a look at testing in terms of percentage of the population:

United States: 1.30%

Germany: 2.45%
South Korea: 1.13%
Canada: 1.51%
United Kingdom: 0.82%
France: 0.71%
Netherlands: 1.00%
Belgium: 1.48%
Sweden: 0.94%
Finland: 1.24%
Norway: 2.74%
Singapore: 1.62%
Italy: 2.50%
Spain: 1.99%

America falls somewhere in the middle among this group of countries, which is an accomplishment considering how many people there are and how physically large the country is. Germany, as an example, is smaller than the state of Montana. It is much easier to test people in a country is dense.
bidde
Senior
Posts: 556
And1: 455
Joined: Mar 13, 2020
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#948 » by bidde » Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:09 am

DowJones wrote:I also think America's "testing failure" is dramatically overblown. America has run 4.32 million. The next closest country is Germany at 2.07 million. Italy is next at 1.51 million. Now let's take a look at testing in terms of percentage of the population:

United States: 1.30%

Germany: 2.45%
South Korea: 1.13%
Canada: 1.51%
United Kingdom: 0.82%
France: 0.71%
Netherlands: 1.00%
Belgium: 1.48%
Sweden: 0.94%
Finland: 1.24%
Norway: 2.74%
Singapore: 1.62%
Italy: 2.50%
Spain: 1.99%

America falls somewhere in the middle among this group of countries, which is an accomplishment considering how many people there are and how physically large the country is. Germany, as an example, is smaller than the state of Montana. It is much easier to test people in a country is dense.


The US has been limited by testing capacity since day 1 and still is today. Germany isn't since March. Comparing numbers like you do doesn't capture that at all.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,191
And1: 5,227
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#949 » by michaelm » Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:14 am

Kabookalu wrote:
michaelm wrote:
DowJones wrote:I really wish our media here in the states wasn't so political with this virus. One side of the political aisle is attacking Fauci and the other side appears to now be attacking Birx, claiming she is losing credibility. They are both extremely good at their jobs--let's let them give advice.

As an outside observer this seems very true. I have been watching snippets of both Fox and Friends and CNN (not for extended periods, there are limits to my curiosity) and both seem agenda driven, and more interested in praising or criticising Trump’s handling of the crisis than in what is actually transpiring.


I don't watch CNN for the same reason I don't ESPN. They take objective information, and manipulate it in a way to make you feel an emotion, because that's how you grab an audience's attention, by making them feel something through your storytelling. They'll take the big picture, and then selectively take bits and pieces of it to form a narrative. CNN is explicit with this, but not to the extent of Fox who might as well be considered state propaganda.

All that being said I don't see how anyone informed on this can say that Trump's handling of this has been anything short of a disaster.

Pretty much my view, admitting I have political bias of my own, but watching CNN it is hard to draw any conclusion other than that they slant things, which of course has no corollary that Fox are unbiased or ‘fair and balanced’ as they claim.

Closing down flights from China early in proceedings for which he was criticised was exactly the right thing to do as has been said, which Australia also did perhaps following his lead, but the focus on China imo may have caused a blind spot in regard to Italy and other places. As I have said previously in addition to quarantining travellers from China for 14 days on an island, the Australian government also quarantined Australians repatriated from the Diamond Princess. If they had extended that to all travellers at that time it would have been a prescient genius move and we very likely would have had very few coronavirus cases, but as is said in medical circles the retrospectoscope is the most powerful diagnostic instrument known to medical science. As has has also been said there doesn’t seem to be any indication that respected and qualified medical experts like Dr Fauci told Trump to close down flights from Europe at the time he closed down flights from China. His focus on economic matters is not unreasonable either imo, a depression following the pandemic may well have worse consequences than the virus itself.

I will say that like Fox and CNN for Trump himself it also seems to be all about Trump
Fairview4Life
RealGM
Posts: 70,257
And1: 34,066
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
     

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#950 » by Fairview4Life » Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:51 am

michaelm wrote:Closing down flights from China early in proceedings for which he was criticised...


He didn't "close down" flights from China early, and he wasn't actually criticized for the restrictions he did put on non American travel from China in January. The only real criticism of his January travel restrictions were because he also extended the Muslim ban to Nigeria and a bunch of other African countries around the same time, because Stephen Miller is a racist clown.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/the-facts-on-trumps-travel-restrictions/

https://www.axios.com/coronavirus-trump-china-travel-ban-45a2da12-8063-4ad9-ba28-61cdeb1ce0b3.html

No need to spread the myth that he stood up to the PC police to save American lives. He didn't. They actually debated travel restrictions for a month before enacting limited restrictions and over 400k travelers had already arrived over that time. 40k arrived after his "ban". There was already community spread in the US by the end of January. The restrictions were clearly late and ineffective anyway.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
User avatar
My Main Man
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,372
And1: 3,649
Joined: Mar 12, 2008
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#951 » by My Main Man » Thu Apr 23, 2020 12:56 am

Reuters and AP are as unbiased as you can get, if people are genuinely looking for straight fact news.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,191
And1: 5,227
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#952 » by michaelm » Thu Apr 23, 2020 1:03 am

Fairview4Life wrote:
michaelm wrote:Closing down flights from China early in proceedings for which he was criticised...


He didn't "close down" flights from China early, and he wasn't actually criticized for the restrictions he did put on non American travel from China in January. The only real criticism of his January travel restrictions were because he also extended the Muslim ban to Nigeria and a bunch of other African countries around the same time, because Stephen Miller is a racist clown.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/the-facts-on-trumps-travel-restrictions/

https://www.axios.com/coronavirus-trump-china-travel-ban-45a2da12-8063-4ad9-ba28-61cdeb1ce0b3.html

No need to spread the myth that he stood up to the PC police to save American lives. He didn't. They actually debated travel restrictions for a month before enacting limited restrictions and over 400k travelers had already arrived over that time. 40k arrived after his "ban". There was already community spread in the US by the end of January. The restrictions were clearly late and ineffective anyway.

My politics and view on this are likely similar to yours, but I didn’t think the forum needed an Australian criticising Trump. You are obviously and unsurprisingly better informed about the USA than I am. This makes our PM for whom I didn’t vote look even better though, he not only put in place a blanket ban on travel from China but also mandatory quarantine at the same time, and has managed to work cooperatively with state leaders of the other political persuasion despite imo being mainly about politics rather than solutions previously.
nymets1
Head Coach
Posts: 6,671
And1: 1,353
Joined: Apr 18, 2004
Location: Florida
     

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#953 » by nymets1 » Thu Apr 23, 2020 1:40 am

Last night's numbers as of 9pm from bing.com/covid

USA- 824,069 confirmed cases(+25,507 increase), Recoveries- 75,050(+2875 increase), Deaths- 45,142(+2582 increase)
New York- 251,690 confirmed cases(+4178 increase)
New Jersey- 92,387 confirmed cases(+4250 increase)
Mass- 41,199 confirmed cases(+3122 increase)
Penn- 34,528 confirmed cases(+2244 increase)
California-33,897 confirmed cases(+2367 increase)
Illinois- 33,059 confirmed cases(+1551 increase)
Michigan- 32,967 confirmed cases(+967 increase)
Florida- 27,869 confirmed cases(+811 increase)
Louisana- 24,854 confirmed cases(+311 increase)
Connecticut- 20,360 confirmed cases(+2398 increase)
Texas- 20,196 confirmed cases(+738 increase)
Georgia- 20,166 confirmed cases(+767 increase)
Maryland- 14,193 confirmed cases(+496 increase)
Ohio- 13,725 confirmed cases(+806 increase)
Washington- 12,282 confirmed cases(+348 increase)
Indiana- 12,097 confirmed cases(+887 increase)

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

USA- 819,805 confirmed cases, Recoveries- 82,923, Deaths- 45,316
New York- 256,555 confirmed cases(+4461 increase)
New Jersey- 92,387 confirmed cases(+3581 increase)
Mass- 41,199 confirmed cases(+1556 increase)
California- 36,704 confirmed cases(+3018 increase)
Penn- 35,293 confirmed cases(+1379 increase)
Illinois- 35,059 confirmed cases(+1551 increase)
Michigan- 32,967 confirmed cases(+967 increase)
Florida- 27,869 confirmed cases(+811 increase)
Louisana- 24,854 confirmed cases(+331 increase)
Texas- 20,596 confirmed cases(+774 increase)
Connecticut- 20,396 confirmed cases(+545 increase)
Georgia- 20,166 confirmed cases(+767 increase)
Maryland- 14,193 confirmed cases(+509 increase)
Ohio- 13,725 confirmed cases(+806 increase)
Washington- 12,282 confirmed cases(+197 increase)
Indiana- 12,097 confirmed cases(+411 increase)

1. New Jersey is less than 10,000 new cases away from potentially reaching 100,000 confirmed cases
2. Louisana is now 11 straight days of low increase in new confirmed cases each day
4. Washington has had a small increase in new confirmed cases over 2 full weeks now, Now just have to watch their active cases left which is 9818
5. Texas now 10 straight days of low increase in new confirmed cases each day
6. Michigan, Florida and Georgia are among the top 11 states with the most confirmed cases and Michigan and Florida now have 4 straight days of keeping their new confirmed cases under 1000 for the day. While Georgia also kept it under 1000 new cases today
7. Ohio had an increase of 806 new cases today after back to back days over 1000+ new cases on Sunday/Monday
8. New York is slowly bringing down their increase in new cases each day, They were increasing 7000 to almost 20,000 new cases each day but today they increased around between +4100 to 4400 after coming down from +4800 yesterday. Once New York gets a day that they only increase around 1000 per day or just under 1000 per day, Than New York would be under control.
9. Bing and worldometers have different numbers as of right now for USA total confirmed cases, USA recoveries and the number of confirmed cases for New York, Penn and California

Today's numbers as of 9pm from bing.com/covid

USA- 852,703 confirmed cases(+25,845 increase), Recoveries- 77,210(+2160 increase), Deaths- 47,750(+2453 increase)
New York- 257,216 confirmed cases(+5526 increase)
New Jersey- 95,865 confirmed cases(+3478 increase)
Mass- 42,944 confirmed cases(+1745 increase)
California- 37,343 confirmed cases(+1893 increase)
Penn- 35,684 confirmed cases(+1156 increase)
Illinois- 35,108 confirmed cases(+2049 increase)
Michigan- 33,666 confirmed cases(+999 increase)
Florida- 28,576 confirmed cases(+707 increase)
Louisana- 25,258 confirmed cases(+404 increase)
Connecticut- 22,469 confirmed cases(+2109 increase)
Georgia- 21,102 confirmed cases(+1221 increase)
Texas- 21,069 confirmed cases(+18 increase)
Maryland- 14,775 confirmed cases(+531 increase)
Ohio- 14,117 confirmed cases(+392 increase)
Washington- 12,494 confirmed cases(+334 increase)

Spain- 208,389 confirmed cases(+810 increase), Recoveries- 85,915(+3401 increase)
Germany- 150,648 confirmed cases, Active cases- 53,721, Recoveries- 91,612(+4112 increase)

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

USA- 848,994 confirmed cases, Recoveries- 84,050, Deaths- 47,676
New York- 262,268 confirmed cases(+5713 increase)
New Jersey- 95,865 confirmed cases(+3478 increase)
Mass- 42,944 confirmed cases(+1745 increase)
California- 37,343 confirmed cases(+1700 increase)
Penn- 36,892 confirmed cases(+1599 increase)
Illinois- 35,108 confirmed cases(+2049 increase)
Michigan- 33,966 confirmed cases(+999 increase)
Florida- 28,576 confirmed cases(+707 increase)
Louisana- 25,258 confirmed cases(+404 increase)
Connecticut- 22,469 confirmed cases(+2109 increase)
Georgia- 21,102 confirmed cases(+936 increase)
Texas- 21,458 confirmed cases(+862 increase)
Maryland- 14,775 confirmed cases(+582 increase)
Ohio- 14,117 confirmed cases(+392 increase)
Washington- 12,494 confirmed cases(+212 increase)

1. New Jersey is less than 5000 new cases away from potentially reaching 100,000 confirmed cases on Thursday or Friday
2. Louisana is now 12 straight days of low increase in new confirmed cases each day, almost at 2 full weeks
3. Washington has had a small increase in new confirmed cases over 2 full weeks now
4. Texas now 11 straight days of low increase in new confirmed cases each day, almost at 2 full weeks
5. Michigan, Florida and Georgia are among the top 11 states with the most confirmed cases and Michigan and Florida now have 5 straight days of keeping their new confirmed cases under 1000 for the day.
6. New York is slowly bringing down their increase in new cases each day, They were increasing 7000 to almost 20,000 new cases each day but today they were still over 5000. Once New York gets a day that they only increase around 1000 per day or just under 1000 per day, Than New York would be under control.
7. Bing and worldometers have different numbers as of right now for USA total confirmed cases, USA recoveries and the number of confirmed cases for New York and Penn.
8. Spain had an increase of 810 new cases today, Are they really slowing down?
9. Germany doesn't show an increase of new cases today on either site, Germany has 53,721 active cases out of 150,648 total cases and 91,612 recoveries according to bing. But worldometers shows Germany has 150,648 total cases, 45,933 active cases and 99,400 recoveries. So both sites have the same number of total cases for Germany but their numbers are different for active cases and recoveries.
"Bodysurfing and always drive with the windows down"

"UCF 2017 only undefeated national champions"
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 16,541
And1: 7,558
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#954 » by DowJones » Thu Apr 23, 2020 2:15 am

Fairview4Life wrote:
michaelm wrote:Closing down flights from China early in proceedings for which he was criticised...


He didn't "close down" flights from China early, and he wasn't actually criticized for the restrictions he did put on non American travel from China in January. The only real criticism of his January travel restrictions were because he also extended the Muslim ban to Nigeria and a bunch of other African countries around the same time, because Stephen Miller is a racist clown.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/the-facts-on-trumps-travel-restrictions/

https://www.axios.com/coronavirus-trump-china-travel-ban-45a2da12-8063-4ad9-ba28-61cdeb1ce0b3.html

No need to spread the myth that he stood up to the PC police to save American lives. He didn't. They actually debated travel restrictions for a month before enacting limited restrictions and over 400k travelers had already arrived over that time. 40k arrived after his "ban". There was already community spread in the US by the end of January. The restrictions were clearly late and ineffective anyway.


The NY Times article your links refer to is disingenuous. Trump had exceptions to the the ban for American citizens coming back. He was never going to close the border to American citizens and their families. The NY Times knows that, but they buried the details in their article.
DowJones
RealGM
Posts: 16,541
And1: 7,558
Joined: Feb 22, 2008

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#955 » by DowJones » Thu Apr 23, 2020 2:22 am

I do think the article is interesting in a different way. There is a graph that shows travel to America from China in the month of January and it shows that LA had significantly more flights than NY. Same with San Francisco. If that is the case, why haven't those 2 cities been hit the way NY has? It goes back to what I said over and over again--travel from Italy was what killed us, not travel from China. America actually did a good job in stopping the spread from China. We just didn't expect Italy to crush us the way that it did and by the time we figured that out (Mid-March) the cat was out of the bag.
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,119
And1: 56,244
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#956 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Thu Apr 23, 2020 2:35 am

DowJones wrote:I also think America's "testing failure" is dramatically overblown. America has run 4.32 million. The next closest country is Germany at 2.07 million. Italy is next at 1.51 million. Now let's take a look at testing in terms of percentage of the population:

United States: 1.30%

Germany: 2.45%
South Korea: 1.13%
Canada: 1.51%
United Kingdom: 0.82%
France: 0.71%
Netherlands: 1.00%
Belgium: 1.48%
Sweden: 0.94%
Finland: 1.24%
Norway: 2.74%
Singapore: 1.62%
Italy: 2.50%
Spain: 1.99%

America falls somewhere in the middle among this group of countries, which is an accomplishment considering how many people there are and how physically large the country is. Germany, as an example, is smaller than the state of Montana. It is much easier to test people in a country is dense.




3 states account for about 1/4th the total of those testing number in the US, and the 2nd most populated state in Texas has done a comically low level of testing. You don't wait for a cluster outbreak to start aggressively testing, which is essentially what about 30-40 states are basically doing.

The testing in the US has been miserable, no amount of spin or excuses can change that.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,191
And1: 5,227
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#957 » by michaelm » Thu Apr 23, 2020 2:53 am

DowJones wrote:I do think the article is interesting in a different way. There is a graph that shows travel to America from China in the month of January and it shows that LA had significantly more flights than NY. Same with San Francisco. If that is the case, why haven't those 2 cities been hit the way NY has? It goes back to what I said over and over again--travel from Italy was what killed us, not travel from China. America actually did a good job in stopping the spread from China. We just didn't expect Italy to crush us the way that it did and by the time we figured that out (Mid-March) the cat was out of the bag.

As we have discussed, everyone flies to the USA from everywhere, and what you can do with such a large land area and large population is problematic in any case.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,136
And1: 24,460
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#958 » by Pointgod » Thu Apr 23, 2020 3:09 am

michaelm wrote:
DowJones wrote:I really wish our media here in the states wasn't so political with this virus. One side of the political aisle is attacking Fauci and the other side appears to now be attacking Birx, claiming she is losing credibility. They are both extremely good at their jobs--let's let them give advice.

As an outside observer this seems very true. I have been watching snippets of both Fox and Friends and CNN (not for extended periods, there are limits to my curiosity) and both seem agenda driven, and more interested in praising or criticising Trump’s handling of the crisis than in what is actually transpiring.


Here’s the thing we’re both outside observers but this isn’t a both sides issue. Trump has been uniquely unqualified to lead in a moment of crisis and he’s screwed this situation up in almost every way imaginable. I don’t watch CNN, but they do provide credible experts on the channel if you don’t want to tune into their opinion segments. I watch MSNBC and they’re really good providing expert analysis but also talking the issue from many different points of view which includes people on the frontlines, policy makers, people from past administrations who were in charge of pandemic responses and unique views on how it disproportionately affects people of colour. Meanwhile Fox News is pushing unfounded claims that it was created in a lab and has idiots like Dr. Phil on there incorrectly claiming more people die in swimming pools than from coronavirus. You can’t talk about the response without criticizing the lack of leadership, it’s plain facts not agenda driven media hype. I think you mentioned you’re from Australia. Well I think your PM is absolute dog ****, but at least you can probably point out specific steps he took to limit the spread and how he actually showed leadership through tone and actions. You don’t have to spin anything because the facts and results can support the argument. Not so much with Trump. The bar is so low with him that if he had shut his mouth and let the experts make decisions he’d be getting all the credit from supposedly bias outlets like CNN. This isn’t inherently political but neither Trump or his supporters can admit that he’s making an extremely tough situation even worse. If you want to get a better idea of what’s happening on the ground in America you should watch the Governor’s addresses.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,191
And1: 5,227
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#959 » by michaelm » Thu Apr 23, 2020 3:19 am

Pointgod wrote:
michaelm wrote:
DowJones wrote:I really wish our media here in the states wasn't so political with this virus. One side of the political aisle is attacking Fauci and the other side appears to now be attacking Birx, claiming she is losing credibility. They are both extremely good at their jobs--let's let them give advice.

As an outside observer this seems very true. I have been watching snippets of both Fox and Friends and CNN (not for extended periods, there are limits to my curiosity) and both seem agenda driven, and more interested in praising or criticising Trump’s handling of the crisis than in what is actually transpiring.


Here’s the thing we’re both outside observers but this isn’t a both sides issue. Trump has been uniquely unqualified to lead in a moment of crisis and he’s screwed this situation up in almost every way imaginable. I don’t watch CNN, but they do provide credible experts on the channel if you don’t want to tune into their opinion segments. I watch MSNBC and they’re really good providing expert analysis but also talking the issue from many different points of view which includes people on the frontlines, policy makers, people from past administrations who were in charge of pandemic responses and unique views on how it disproportionately affects people of colour. Meanwhile Fox News is pushing unfounded claims that it was created in a lab and has idiots like Dr. Phil on there incorrectly claiming more people die in swimming pools than from coronavirus. You can’t talk about the response without criticizing the lack of leadership, it’s plain facts not agenda driven media hype. I think you mentioned you’re from Australia. Well I think your PM is absolute dog ****, but at least you can probably point out specific steps he took to limit the spread and how he actually showed leadership through tone and actions. You don’t have to spin anything because the facts and results can support the argument. Not so much with Trump. The bar is so low with him that if he had shut his mouth and let the experts make decisions he’d be getting all the credit from supposedly bias outlets like CNN. This isn’t inherently political but neither Trump or his supporters can admit that he’s making an extremely tough situation even worse. If you want to get a better idea of what’s happening on the ground in America you should watch the Governor’s addresses.

We are rather familiar with the Murdoch media in Australia, here is where he came from, and Sky news in Australia is similar to Fox in the USA. I don’t know whether he stills owns Sky UK, but they are much more informative and much less agenda driven, to my eyes anyway.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,191
And1: 5,227
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Semi-OT: Coronavirus (COVID-19) Discussion Thread 

Post#960 » by michaelm » Thu Apr 23, 2020 3:24 am

double

Return to The General Board