Nikola wrote:Interesting take from Doctors against continuing the lockdown.
I don't necessarily disagree with their conclusion--that enforced home isolation of the healthy is a bad idea for prolonged periods and we need to start easing up, but the 'facts' and 'data' they present is utter and complete rubbish from a mathematical and statistical point of view, and it speaks poorly for the interviewing journalists that nobody called them on it.
Their conclusions are based on a model which in essence normalizes what they see in a very tilted data set to be true for the entire population, which is just as nonsensical as the original models that everybody else did that they disparaged themselves.
I'm not saying that what I'm about to type next is the reason why they came forward, but it's not feasible that it didn't affect their thinking--my family has several doctor friends, an anesthesiologist, two surgeons and a coupe of GPs. All have been furloughed or even technically speaking laid off. If you work in a small/niche practice, your volume is down to practically zero. I know from a contact that one of the largest hospital chains in Florida is losing millions / day, and every single small to medium-sized practice is probably experiencing a smaller-scale version of that.
Because of that, it is difficult to judge if they are speaking as small business owners, or as doctors, since they own several clinics. Doesn't mean they are wrong--if I had to guess their intuition is spot on and they are correct in how they want to handle the crisis, but they obviously have their own biases, which are not purely medical. Their conclusions are based on intuition and not on science every bit as much as everybody else's--in modelling, that approach is called both 'garbage in, garbage out' and 'curve-fitted', which pretty much means that the model just spits out an answer that has no predictive value of any kind.
If this were airborne Ebola that kills half and incapacitates half of the survivors, maybe such draconian measures globally would have been warranted. But for this? I don't know--and this comes from somebody who can be considered to be a part of a high risk group (unrelated to covid) and who thinks this is actually much, much worse than the regular flu from the numbers I've run in-house... and who has close family members who've already had it.