ImageImage

Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Packers Talking Extension with Aaron Jones

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,524
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#721 » by M-C-G » Thu Apr 30, 2020 7:22 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
JayMKE wrote:Like it or not, the writing is on the wall for Rodgers and this is the beginning of the end. I don’t see Love as a great prospect and don’t want to commit to him as some sort of heir apparent. It’s clear the FO wants their job security pushed out a few years before forcing Rodgers out, they intend to waste the next couple years then get a few more as we wait for their vision to turn out. They should all be fired.


Rodgers is the QB for 2020 and 2021 and probably 2022.

Love is going to be sitting for 3 seasons unless Rodgers dramatically declines, Rodgers gets hurt, and/or the Packers have a catastrophic losing season.

I think this roster is good for 9 wins, maybe 10.


According to spotrac, Rodgers has a potential out after two seasons. I think it is safe to say MLF and Gute plan on Love being the starter in 2023

POTENTIAL OUT: 2022, 4 YR, $125,770,000; $17,204,000 DEAD CAP
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#722 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Apr 30, 2020 7:27 pm

M-C-G wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
JayMKE wrote:Like it or not, the writing is on the wall for Rodgers and this is the beginning of the end. I don’t see Love as a great prospect and don’t want to commit to him as some sort of heir apparent. It’s clear the FO wants their job security pushed out a few years before forcing Rodgers out, they intend to waste the next couple years then get a few more as we wait for their vision to turn out. They should all be fired.


Rodgers is the QB for 2020 and 2021 and probably 2022.

Love is going to be sitting for 3 seasons unless Rodgers dramatically declines, Rodgers gets hurt, and/or the Packers have a catastrophic losing season.

I think this roster is good for 9 wins, maybe 10.


According to spotrac, Rodgers has a potential out after two seasons. I think it is safe to say MLF and Gute plan on Love being the starter in 2023

POTENTIAL OUT: 2022, 4 YR, $125,770,000; $17,204,000 DEAD CAP
Yeah 2 years is probably the best guess on the timeframe.

But lots can happen that could swing this either way. As I've been saying odds are we'll see Love play as an injury replacement some time in the next two seasons. I feel like with QBs you can tell pretty quickly once they play if you have something with them, not stats so much but a general eye test pass fail. I remember Rodgers coming against the cowboys when favre was knocked out early and you could tell pretty quickly he belonged. On the flip side it was clear really quickly that Hundley didn't have it after a start or two. So there's a very good chance they'll have a strong opinion of Love before they need to make a decision on Aaron.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,288
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#723 » by FAH1223 » Thu Apr 30, 2020 7:29 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Rodgers is the QB for 2020 and 2021 and probably 2022.

Love is going to be sitting for 3 seasons unless Rodgers dramatically declines, Rodgers gets hurt, and/or the Packers have a catastrophic losing season.

I think this roster is good for 9 wins, maybe 10.


According to spotrac, Rodgers has a potential out after two seasons. I think it is safe to say MLF and Gute plan on Love being the starter in 2023

POTENTIAL OUT: 2022, 4 YR, $125,770,000; $17,204,000 DEAD CAP
Yeah 2 years is probably the best guess on the timeframe.

But lots can happen that could swing this either way. As I've been saying odds are we'll see Love play as an injury replacement some time in the next two seasons. I feel like with QBs you can tell pretty quickly once they play if you have something with them, not stats so much but a general eye test pass fail. I remember Rodgers coming against the cowboys when favre was knocked out early and you could tell pretty quickly he belonged. On the flip side it was clear really quickly that Hundley didn't have it after a start or two. So there's a very good chance they'll have a strong opinion of Love before they need to make a decision on Aaron.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app


When Aaron came in for Favre in 2006 against the Patriots and ended up breaking his foot and not looking good (in a 35-0 shutout), I was really worried.

But he played well in 2007 in preseason and stepped in for that Cowboys game.
Image
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,524
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#724 » by M-C-G » Thu Apr 30, 2020 7:38 pm

Yeah that is funny, I didn't even remember him playing a snap before that Dallas game, but yeah, that is when I felt like we had a legit future QB
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,288
And1: 7,382
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#725 » by FAH1223 » Thu Apr 30, 2020 7:57 pm

M-C-G wrote:Yeah that is funny, I didn't even remember him playing a snap before that QB game, but yeah, that is when I felt like we had a legit future QB


He played in a blowout loss to the Ravens in 2005 and looked awful too.
Image
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,002
And1: 16,681
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#726 » by humanrefutation » Thu Apr 30, 2020 10:21 pm

That Cowboys game basically made Aaron the clear heir apparent. He was really good in that game.

I still think, on balance, I'd take Rodgers over the vast majority of NFL QBs, simply because his best is just as good as you'll see anywhere else. But he looked absolutely lackadaisical at times last year and missed way too many throws for a QB of his caliber. And honestly, I don't trust him not to suffer another serious, season-altering injury again.

That doesn't mean Love is the guy, though. But my guess is that you're going to see him in action sooner than expected. I don't think he'll sit around for three full seasons on the bench.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,524
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#727 » by M-C-G » Thu Apr 30, 2020 10:42 pm

humanrefutation wrote:That Cowboys game basically made Aaron the clear heir apparent. He was really good in that game.

I still think, on balance, I'd take Rodgers over the vast majority of NFL QBs, simply because his best is just as good as you'll see anywhere else. But he looked absolutely lackadaisical at times last year and missed way too many throws for a QB of his caliber. And honestly, I don't trust him not to suffer another serious, season-altering injury again.

That doesn't mean Love is the guy, though. But my guess is that you're going to see him in action sooner than expected. I don't think he'll sit around for three full seasons on the bench.


To me, it looked like he didn't fully know the playbook last year, which sounds impossible for a guy like Aaron. Too many times he seemed to just be missing guys that were open because it just seemed like he didn't even check on them.

Will be an interesting year, I suspect we are either going to get the best Rodgers we have seen in years, or we are going to hear 17 weeks about how the GM and team let down Aaron by not getting a WR out of this draft.

I am curious to see what Rodgers can do with play action with really credible run threats. I think we will see that more this year.
User avatar
LittleRooster
General Manager
Posts: 8,599
And1: 3,247
Joined: Apr 02, 2010
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#728 » by LittleRooster » Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:04 pm

skones wrote:
jimmybones wrote:
skones wrote:Imagine having a chance to to get four or five seasons out of one of the best QBs of all time and insisting that you want the offense run in a certain way that DOESN'T necessarily cater to what that QB does well. The offense shouldn't be structured independently of Rodgers. It should be structured AROUND Rodgers. Andy Reid isn't sitting around telling Patrick Mahomes to do less. He's adapted to his player.

LaFleur didn't give us any type of modernized offense. I didn't see imaginative play calling or route concepts. There wasn't overly extensive use of motion to disguise things. All in all, things were pretty vanilla, and given how his fingerprints seem to be all over this draft, personnel won't be an excuse he'll have.


If this was 2011 or 2014 I'd agree with you. But, 2020 Aaron Rodgers is NOT 2020 Patrick Mahomes.


Aaron Rodgers still has more talent in his body than all but 5 guys in the entire NFL. He doesn't need to be Patrick Mahomes to have an offense structured around him with his arm talent. When you have a talent of Rodgers ilk, you build a gameplan around what he does well. You don't build a game plan and system out of thin air and tell him to fit it. Good coaches adapt, bad coaches tell their players to. Build your offense around your personnel. If Rodgers isn't Mahomes was your takeaway from my post, you missed the boat.

The problem is Aaron isn’t playing within any offense and hasn’t for the last 6ish years. He ad-libs, which obviously can work, but he misses open stuff that’s there within the offense.

The second Vikings game, especially the first half, that’s Aaron playing within MLF’s offense. And it looked great. If he does that, we’re golden. The offense is designed for him and others to be successful


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
vital_signs
Analyst
Posts: 3,368
And1: 2,239
Joined: Feb 12, 2015
 

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#729 » by vital_signs » Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:48 pm

M-C-G wrote:Yeah that is funny, I didn't even remember him playing a snap before that Dallas game, but yeah, that is when I felt like we had a legit future QB

My one and only packer game was a blowout loss to the Patriots where Brett broke his foot and Aaron stepped in. At the time I felt like the franchise was in for a rough decade.

With that being said, seeing 3 HOF QBs play in one game has to be worth something right? Despite losing, if memory serves me correctly, 35-0. Atleast the tickets were free :nonono:
Inadequate perception I reckon it's from the Valium
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,761
And1: 56,049
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#730 » by MickeyDavis » Fri May 1, 2020 12:30 am

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
slappyg
Junior
Posts: 442
And1: 292
Joined: Jan 19, 2008

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#731 » by slappyg » Fri May 1, 2020 12:31 am

stillgotgame wrote:
thonnisbeastley wrote:What an embarrassing draft. Jordan Love? Seriously? Look at his face and his demeanor. That dumb blank expression and grin. He will never be a regular starter in the NFL and Rodgers will want out ASAP.



An embarrassment, yes. The way Gute kissed MLF’s butt by reaching for all guys to fit MLF’s dreams with complete disregard to Rodgers, yes.

But to say Love won’t make it based on his facial expression? That’s pretty hard to believe. I’m as negative about this draft as anyone on this board but I still think there’s a chance Love will be successful. Whether he will be successful is very definitely tbd.


Yeah, even Cutler with his punch me face made it for a while
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,748
And1: 8,166
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#732 » by jakecronus8 » Fri May 1, 2020 4:23 am

MickeyDavis wrote:
Read on Twitter

Had a friend text me that this is all Aaron sending messages that he wants out. :lol:

Afterlife is code for him leaving Green Bay and listing all of Gervais’ greatest hits is code for his Packers accomplishments. Season 2 meaning his next team. :noway:

People are so **** stupid.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
Frank Nova
Head Coach
Posts: 7,368
And1: 3,552
Joined: Jul 04, 2008
Location: Shootin’ dice with Larry Bird in Barcelona
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#733 » by Frank Nova » Fri May 1, 2020 3:44 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:Yeah that is funny, I didn't even remember him playing a snap before that QB game, but yeah, that is when I felt like we had a legit future QB


He played in a blowout loss to the Ravens in 2005 and looked awful too.


It’s shocking to me to hear anyone say they had that type of confidence in Rodgers taking over. I vaguely remember the Dallas game as much as the 1st 2 seasons he had phantom season ending injuries. I remember being insanely pessimistic going from 4 to 12, even that 1st 6-10 season as a starter I thought we were stupid for pushing Brett out the door. His 2nd year as a starter in 09-10 was when the I became optimistic I was wrong and we had a potential superstar QB and he won his ship the following year. It took damn near 5yrs for Rodgers to prove he was the man.
RIP Kobe Forever. GOAT 8-24. Long Live Giannis
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,524
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#734 » by M-C-G » Fri May 1, 2020 3:56 pm

Frank Nova wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:Yeah that is funny, I didn't even remember him playing a snap before that QB game, but yeah, that is when I felt like we had a legit future QB


He played in a blowout loss to the Ravens in 2005 and looked awful too.


It’s shocking to me to hear anyone say they had that type of confidence in Rodgers taking over. I vaguely remember the Dallas game as much as the 1st 2 seasons he had phantom season ending injuries. I remember being insanely pessimistic going from 4 to 12, even that 1st 6-10 season as a starter I thought we were stupid for pushing Brett out the door. His 2nd year as a starter in 09-10 was when the I became optimistic I was wrong and we had a potential superstar QB and he won his ship the following year. It took damn near 5yrs for Rodgers to prove he was the man.


I think what we are saying is in that Dallas game, we recognized he had a chance to be really good. There was something about that game that just made me think, huh, dude can play.
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,839
And1: 1,947
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#735 » by Treebeard » Fri May 1, 2020 4:45 pm

Packers sign DL Treyvon Hester

https://www.packers.com/news/packers-sign-dl-treyvon-hester?fbclid=IwAR3bTO42X4Dr2uJmEUrmCu__Dhg9MV1FU2H39Sqcr0N5s0NuXEX5iAWd5lw

The Green Bay Packers have signed DL Treyvon Hester. General Manager Brian Gutekunst announced the transaction Friday.

Hester (6-2, 304), a fourth-year player out of the University of Toledo, was originally selected by the Oakland Raiders in the seventh round (No. 244 overall) of the 2017 NFL Draft. He has appeared in 41 games with two starts during his career and has registered 40 tackles (19 solo), two sacks, a forced fumble and a fumble recovery. Hester played for the Raiders in 2017 (14 games played, one start), the Philadelphia Eagles in 2018 (12 games, one start) and the Washington Redskins in 2019 (15 games). He will wear No. 93 for the Packers.
*******************************************************
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,092
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#736 » by Daver » Fri May 1, 2020 5:06 pm

Treebeard wrote:Packers sign DL Treyvon Hester

https://www.packers.com/news/packers-sign-dl-treyvon-hester?fbclid=IwAR3bTO42X4Dr2uJmEUrmCu__Dhg9MV1FU2H39Sqcr0N5s0NuXEX5iAWd5lw

The Green Bay Packers have signed DL Treyvon Hester. General Manager Brian Gutekunst announced the transaction Friday.

Hester (6-2, 304), a fourth-year player out of the University of Toledo, was originally selected by the Oakland Raiders in the seventh round (No. 244 overall) of the 2017 NFL Draft. He has appeared in 41 games with two starts during his career and has registered 40 tackles (19 solo), two sacks, a forced fumble and a fumble recovery. Hester played for the Raiders in 2017 (14 games played, one start), the Philadelphia Eagles in 2018 (12 games, one start) and the Washington Redskins in 2019 (15 games). He will wear No. 93 for the Packers.


Yawn ....i guess no harrison then or gabriel just some guy who .......
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,952
And1: 41,336
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#737 » by emunney » Fri May 1, 2020 5:26 pm

It'd be great if Love was ready to be a starter at any point and forced a decision. I think it's early to say that the FO is planning this or that years in the future. Who knows what this situation will look like in 3 years? Rodgers could be retired and Love could have flamed out.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
LittleRooster
General Manager
Posts: 8,599
And1: 3,247
Joined: Apr 02, 2010
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#738 » by LittleRooster » Fri May 1, 2020 5:55 pm

M-C-G wrote:
Frank Nova wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
He played in a blowout loss to the Ravens in 2005 and looked awful too.


It’s shocking to me to hear anyone say they had that type of confidence in Rodgers taking over. I vaguely remember the Dallas game as much as the 1st 2 seasons he had phantom season ending injuries. I remember being insanely pessimistic going from 4 to 12, even that 1st 6-10 season as a starter I thought we were stupid for pushing Brett out the door. His 2nd year as a starter in 09-10 was when the I became optimistic I was wrong and we had a potential superstar QB and he won his ship the following year. It took damn near 5yrs for Rodgers to prove he was the man.


I think what we are saying is in that Dallas game, we recognized he had a chance to be really good. There was something about that game that just made me think, huh, dude can play.

Yes. That’s when I felt it. That preseason was better and after the Dallas game I was in favor of moving on with Rodgers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,952
And1: 41,336
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#739 » by emunney » Fri May 1, 2020 7:06 pm

Wonder how MLF felt about Corey Davis.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread -RIP Willie Davis 

Post#740 » by skones » Fri May 1, 2020 7:54 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
What exactly is this statement based on? Because the last two years he's been a pretty average QB.


Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Except that that's not even close to being true. Feel free to take a look at what's "average" in the NFL. It's not Aaron Rodgers, and it's flat out ridiculous that you think so.

Return to Green Bay Packers