Nikola wrote:Ccwatercraft wrote:Nikola wrote:It does not need to be done so haphazardly though. Why do people who are still working get $1200? Even if they gave it back why would the LA Lakers get 7M. It would take minutes to find more examples. The government didn't feel the need to spend a little time on this?
I'll take a stab at that.
The more time the govt spends on stuff like this usually means more pork, not a cleaner, leaner stimulus.
The lakers were massively profitable before this yes, but they didnt suffer when the season ended abruptly? the Lakers loss was legit, it's just bad optics.
No it is not legit. The NBA could operate at a fraction of it's current revenue. The owners can cover a couple months of expenses very easily. And it's a game there is no need for a taxpayer bailout.I have been employed along with my spouse through this, but by June were expecting a minimum of 900-1200 a month in income losses that could remain through 2021 or possibly result in losing a 30 year career unless a vaccine by year end is developed and has real success.
Just because there was no immediate job loss doesn't mean there aren't major long term financial impacts from the recession, lack of tourism, Etc.
So basically millions in similar situations profited in April from the stimulus but by years end might be losing that amount every month.
Were already cutting back now in anticipation of an ugly 3rd and 4th q, and an uglier 2021.
$1200 is a drop in the bucket
I will say if they are going to throw money around just giving it to the people is not the worst. But why not wait and see what the actual need is. Money cannot be printed indefinitely without ill effects.
The issue I took with the stimulus was sending money to family members that were retired or on disability, they will suffer no direct impacts to their daily lives.
I have friends and customers for example have been retired for years and just assumed they weren't included, then they get money out of the blue. Now possibly that means they spend it and help stimulate to economy on the back end, but besides that it seemed like the least practical group to send cash too.
As far as the lakers, we can agree to disagree, the PPP didn't differiante between essential and non essential that I'm aware of and its irrelevant if the owner can afford to absorb losses, if that was the case many thousands of business owners would he disqualified just because they have a sizable net worth from past success.

















