ImageImage

Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Packers Talking Extension with Aaron Jones

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,748
And1: 8,163
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#821 » by jakecronus8 » Tue May 5, 2020 11:28 pm

I’d be interested to know how one could possibly surmise how many total yards of offense are lost on dropped balls. I’d also be interested if they could tell me how many stalled drives we had due to Aaron not taking an open read and looking for a bigger play.
Do it for Chuck
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,516
And1: 2,303
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#822 » by stillgotgame » Tue May 5, 2020 11:40 pm

Receiver and QB play didn't cause us to get stomped (twice) by San Fran.
Our run D was pathetic, and our offensive line got dominated. They killed us in the trenches.
Good thing we fixed that. Oh, wait :banghead:
Bucks in 6
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,090
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#823 » by Daver » Wed May 6, 2020 7:24 am

jakecronus8 wrote:I’d be interested to know how one could possibly surmise how many total yards of offense are lost on dropped balls. I’d also be interested if they could tell me how many stalled drives we had due to Aaron not taking an open read and looking for a bigger play.



I agree. Everyone i mean every pro football know it all brings up the packer receivers as a problem yet you nailed it its adsolutely not all on the wrs because if our former MVP would hit the hot read open guy instead of throwing a 25 yard pass on 3rd and 4 or tbrowing to a triple teamed adams the drives would continue and our weak ass receiving core wouldnt look so weak.
I know im in the minority on this but i would love rodgers to put up bradys daily stats what i mean is brady will go 35-41 only 281 yards but 3 tds he will dink n dunk all game every game rarely throws long.
Rodgers will go 25-45 275 yards plus.It seems like he just refuses to take what the D gives him and on 3rd n short he just will never try to move the chains with a pass to the 1st down marker instead he throws a low % pass 25 yards down the field which is usually incomplete and as fans we blame the receiverz
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,090
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#824 » by Daver » Fri May 8, 2020 11:04 pm

Wow larry warford just got cut by the aints 3 time all pro guard to me this could be a guy GB talks to would upgrade that line
DrWood
Head Coach
Posts: 6,496
And1: 2,383
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#825 » by DrWood » Sat May 9, 2020 3:16 am

Daver wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:I’d be interested to know how one could possibly surmise how many total yards of offense are lost on dropped balls. I’d also be interested if they could tell me how many stalled drives we had due to Aaron not taking an open read and looking for a bigger play.



I agree. Everyone i mean every pro football know it all brings up the packer receivers as a problem yet you nailed it its adsolutely not all on the wrs because if our former MVP would hit the hot read open guy instead of throwing a 25 yard pass on 3rd and 4 or tbrowing to a triple teamed adams the drives would continue and our weak ass receiving core wouldnt look so weak.
I know im in the minority on this but i would love rodgers to put up bradys daily stats what i mean is brady will go 35-41 only 281 yards but 3 tds he will dink n dunk all game every game rarely throws long.
Rodgers will go 25-45 275 yards plus.It seems like he just refuses to take what the D gives him and on 3rd n short he just will never try to move the chains with a pass to the 1st down marker instead he throws a low % pass 25 yards down the field which is usually incomplete and as fans we blame the receiverz

Rodgers completed a higher %-age than Brady, and didn't have much higher yards per catch, which was middle of the pack.

I wish he'd have more confidence in his receivers and let them go get the ball. He seemed to be developing that with Lazard toward the end of the season.
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,090
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#826 » by Daver » Sat May 9, 2020 10:22 am

You just dont see brady in his O scheme constantly go for low % passses on 3rd down n less thsn 5 he will throw a 6 yard pass to keep the chains moving and rodgers in what seems like game after game goes for a very long completion instead of a higger percentage pass to get the O going .
Hard to get rhythm when on damn near what seems like every 3rd down n short he tries a 30 yard pass n then people question why the O struggles to score
mkegb
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,323
And1: 548
Joined: Apr 26, 2017

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#827 » by mkegb » Sat May 9, 2020 1:21 pm

Daver wrote:Wow larry warford just got cut by the aints 3 time all pro guard to me this could be a guy GB talks to would upgrade that line


Yes please
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#828 » by M-C-G » Sat May 9, 2020 3:00 pm

DrWood wrote:
I wish he'd have more confidence in his receivers and let them go get the ball. He seemed to be developing that with Lazard toward the end of the season.


No data on this but I seem to recall Lazard's big plays tended to be on the boundary, where MVS was more running stuff down the middle of the field. It'd be interesting to see if that is a legit causal or not.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#829 » by M-C-G » Sat May 9, 2020 8:18 pm

Really like the UDFAs from PVAMU. Jordan Jones the TE has a chance to stick, fantastic feet for a guy 250
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,630
And1: 8,338
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#830 » by Profound23 » Sun May 10, 2020 12:59 am

Warford being cut is just weird.

The Saints used a first round pick to draft an interior lineman, then cut one who was in his prime and actually on a team friendly deal. No way we can afford him. He is going to make more than he was getting in New Orleans, they just did him a favor.
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,748
And1: 8,163
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#831 » by jakecronus8 » Sun May 10, 2020 6:10 am

Man. How much could we save by cutting Taylor? Warford is a beast.
Do it for Chuck
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#832 » by M-C-G » Sun May 10, 2020 2:07 pm

jakecronus8 wrote:Man. How much could we save by cutting Taylor? Warford is a beast.

Can we ask the obvious question, why was he cut?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,630
And1: 8,338
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#833 » by Profound23 » Sun May 10, 2020 2:32 pm

M-C-G wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Man. How much could we save by cutting Taylor? Warford is a beast.

Can we ask the obvious question, why was he cut?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Saints only had 600k in caproom, not even enough to sign their rookies. We would be in a similar boat if we signed Warford though or we would have to backload it and lose most or all of our free agents next year.

Is signing Warford this year worth losing Clark next year? I don't think so.
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,839
And1: 1,947
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#834 » by Treebeard » Sun May 10, 2020 2:43 pm

M-C-G wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Man. How much could we save by cutting Taylor? Warford is a beast.

Can we ask the obvious question, why was he cut?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Yeah, what don't we know? At least do the due diligence and check the situation out.
*******************************************************
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,977
And1: 5,031
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#835 » by RRyder823 » Sun May 10, 2020 3:25 pm

Profound23 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
jakecronus8 wrote:Man. How much could we save by cutting Taylor? Warford is a beast.

Can we ask the obvious question, why was he cut?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Saints only had 600k in caproom, not even enough to sign their rookies. We would be in a similar boat if we signed Warford though or we would have to backload it and lose most or all of our free agents next year.

Is signing Warford this year worth losing Clark next year? I don't think so.
You stop making sense

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,630
And1: 8,338
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#836 » by Profound23 » Sun May 10, 2020 5:01 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
Profound23 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:Can we ask the obvious question, why was he cut?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Saints only had 600k in caproom, not even enough to sign their rookies. We would be in a similar boat if we signed Warford though or we would have to backload it and lose most or all of our free agents next year.

Is signing Warford this year worth losing Clark next year? I don't think so.
You stop making sense

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, we are screwed next year covid messes up the cap. With all the free agents coming up next year, I don't think we can't sign anyone.

I am really holding out hope we can retain at least Bakh (hoping last year was just a bad year) or Clark. I already assume King and Jones are gone.
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,090
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#837 » by Daver » Sun May 10, 2020 5:23 pm

Profound23 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
Profound23 wrote:
Saints only had 600k in caproom, not even enough to sign their rookies. We would be in a similar boat if we signed Warford though or we would have to backload it and lose most or all of our free agents next year.

Is signing Warford this year worth losing Clark next year? I don't think so.
You stop making sense

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, we are screwed next year covid messes up the cap. With all the free agents coming up next year, I don't think we can't sign anyone.

I am really holding out hope we can retain at least Bakh (hoping last year was just a bad year) or Clark. I already assume King and Jones are gone.



King gets hurt wiping his own ass as much as think he can be a top flight corner i think for the amount of money he has in his head that he wants i think the packers let him walk.
As for warford dude would look great at guard in GB as another poster said i hope they at least talk to his agent and do the noble TT thing and that is kick the tires.
Maybe im wrong probably am but if they really wanted to sign him they could make it work.Andrew brandt evrn mentioned that in a article
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#838 » by M-C-G » Sun May 10, 2020 5:26 pm

Here is the Jordan James highlight reel

;list=RDuPUX8XewXTE&start_radio=1&t=4
MAC1987
Starter
Posts: 2,050
And1: 526
Joined: Jan 27, 2018

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#839 » by MAC1987 » Sun May 10, 2020 10:38 pm

Well, with AROD is there a possibility his contract can be restructured to sign our guys?
Profound23 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:
Profound23 wrote:
Saints only had 600k in caproom, not even enough to sign their rookies. We would be in a similar boat if we signed Warford though or we would have to backload it and lose most or all of our free agents next year.

Is signing Warford this year worth losing Clark next year? I don't think so.
You stop making sense

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, we are screwed next year covid messes up the cap. With all the free agents coming up next year, I don't think we can't sign anyone.

I am really holding out hope we can retain at least Bakh (hoping last year was just a bad year) or Clark. I already assume King and Jones are gone.


Sent from my SM-T510 using RealGM mobile app
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,977
And1: 5,031
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#840 » by RRyder823 » Mon May 11, 2020 12:47 am

MAC1987 wrote:Well, with AROD is there a possibility his contract can be restructured to sign our guys?
Profound23 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:You stop making sense

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, we are screwed next year covid messes up the cap. With all the free agents coming up next year, I don't think we can't sign anyone.

I am really holding out hope we can retain at least Bakh (hoping last year was just a bad year) or Clark. I already assume King and Jones are gone.


Sent from my SM-T510 using RealGM mobile app
For one he just restructured not to long ago

Secondly unless its a strait paycut he'd be accepting it would just be extending his guarantees into the final 2 years of his deal. (Something I'm sure the Packers have little interest in doing post Love selection)

And finally Rodgers accepting a paycut would be extremely suprising considering he was pretty vocal about wanting a new deal when he felt underpaid (there's a reason why he got an extension when he had multiple years left) and I'm sure he isn't more open to the idea of a paycut post draft

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app

Return to Green Bay Packers