Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,621
- And1: 3,406
- Joined: May 28, 2004
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
This reminds me a lot of Curry or Griffin. I think the smaller Ja has the best chance of having a longer and sustainable impact to a championship type scenario. Zion, like Griffin, will have the more hype and highlights, but will VERY likely break down within 3-4 years. It's a fact: The body can not continue to sustain that level of athletic activity in such a heavy body. He needs to drop 20 lb's or he's in trouble. IMO
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,621
- And1: 21,168
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
ILOVEIT wrote:This reminds me a lot of Curry or Griffin. I think the smaller Ja has the best chance of having a longer and sustainable impact to a championship type scenario. Zion, like Griffin, will have the more hype and highlights, but will VERY likely break down within 3-4 years. It's a fact: The body can not continue to sustain that level of athletic activity in such a heavy body. He needs to drop 20 lb's or he's in trouble. IMO
Ja is a guard. he's going to be more of a difference maker long term since he's probably going to handling the ball way more than Zion ever will.
Zion will have some great years but i think his physical dominance will take a toll on his body long term.
barring any injuries though, Ja is more likely a difference maker based on the guard-oriented league where you need elite guards to win the game.
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,631
- And1: 2,260
- Joined: Mar 06, 2009
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
ILOVEIT wrote:This reminds me a lot of Curry or Griffin. I think the smaller Ja has the best chance of having a longer and sustainable impact to a championship type scenario. Zion, like Griffin, will have the more hype and highlights, but will VERY likely break down within 3-4 years. It's a fact: The body can not continue to sustain that level of athletic activity in such a heavy body. He needs to drop 20 lb's or he's in trouble. IMO
Or it could be more like the 2008 draft where Derrick Rose breaks himself down to a shadow of himself cause he's a guard and Brook Lopez a 7 footer is still playing strong.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,474
- And1: 1,594
- Joined: Jun 21, 2005
- Location: New Orleans
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
I truly feel like if the season had finished completely, Zion would have stolen it. He was just that good. On another level.
But he simply didn't play enough games. It is Ja's. And that's cool. Both are going to be great.
I think Zion will be on another level from everyone in the long run though.
But he simply didn't play enough games. It is Ja's. And that's cool. Both are going to be great.
I think Zion will be on another level from everyone in the long run though.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,976
- And1: 767
- Joined: Mar 01, 2010
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
With the season stopped now I’m fine with Ja getting it, but Zion was a better playing in both advanced stats and old school counting stats.
The Pels were waaaaay better with him on the floor.
What I will say is that Jah was better in the clutch which backs up the idea that because he’s a ball handler he can affect the game in major ways.
However, I will say that it’s important to note that the Warriors are the only team since the Pistons to win a chip when their best player was the point guard and Jay’s size will be an impediment his entire career.
Granted he’s just a rook but Jrue shut him down as a bigger more aggressive defender and there will be more of that Type of defense in the playoffs.
The Pels were waaaaay better with him on the floor.
What I will say is that Jah was better in the clutch which backs up the idea that because he’s a ball handler he can affect the game in major ways.
However, I will say that it’s important to note that the Warriors are the only team since the Pistons to win a chip when their best player was the point guard and Jay’s size will be an impediment his entire career.
Granted he’s just a rook but Jrue shut him down as a bigger more aggressive defender and there will be more of that Type of defense in the playoffs.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
- Crizzle
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,029
- And1: 1,004
- Joined: Jun 19, 2018
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
lordjeff05 wrote:With the season stopped now I’m fine with Ja getting it, but Zion was a better playing in both advanced stats and old school counting stats.
The Pels were waaaaay better with him on the floor.
What I will say is that Jah was better in the clutch which backs up the idea that because he’s a ball handler he can affect the game in major ways.
However, I will say that it’s important to note that the Warriors are the only team since the Pistons to win a chip when their best player was the point guard and Jay’s size will be an impediment his entire career.
Granted he’s just a rook but Jrue shut him down as a bigger more aggressive defender and there will be more of that Type of defense in the playoffs.
I feel JJJ has to max his potential and end up being the best of the two
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 43,007
- And1: 18,074
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
I wish the Grizz weren't such a good organization and we could have coaxed them into a trade for #2.
Or if the Lakers had gotten the #2 pick... I know I'm just being greedy
Or if the Lakers had gotten the #2 pick... I know I'm just being greedy
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,865
- And1: 3,878
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
Ja just based on the fact that he played the full season, Zion was injured for a fair bit and Ja led the Grizzlies to be a playoff contender, that in itself is very impressive.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,689
- And1: 3,579
- Joined: Nov 10, 2011
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
NO-KG-AI wrote:I wish the Grizz weren't such a good organization and we could have coaxed them into a trade for #2.
Or if the Lakers had gotten the #2 pick... I know I'm just being greedy
If Chris Wallace was still there, you might have had a chance.
Check out my Memphis Grizzlies Youtube Channel --->>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbB6yGykQEUwl9hqWYVp45g
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,976
- And1: 767
- Joined: Mar 01, 2010
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
Crizzle wrote:lordjeff05 wrote:With the season stopped now I’m fine with Ja getting it, but Zion was a better playing in both advanced stats and old school counting stats.
The Pels were waaaaay better with him on the floor.
What I will say is that Jah was better in the clutch which backs up the idea that because he’s a ball handler he can affect the game in major ways.
However, I will say that it’s important to note that the Warriors are the only team since the Pistons to win a chip when their best player was the point guard and Jay’s size will be an impediment his entire career.
Granted he’s just a rook but Jrue shut him down as a bigger more aggressive defender and there will be more of that Type of defense in the playoffs.
I feel JJJ has to max his potential and end up being the best of the two
JJJ is a prototype big and I am as excited as anyone about his potential. Are you saying he has a chance to be better than Jah or Zion? I don’t see that but you never know. He gives me a Rasheed Wallace vibe in so far as he has the potential to be able to do everything on both ends of the court but I don’t know if I see him consistently taking over games like Jah and Zion.
I don’t think people realize how dominant Zion was this year. Go look up how many rooks had his average points per game . Not impressed because of the short year? Go look at how many games he got over 25 points a game and compare it to any rookie of the last 30 years. Don’t care about counting stats? Look at his net rating.
At every level of competition Zion has been doubted and has dominated.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
- Crizzle
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,029
- And1: 1,004
- Joined: Jun 19, 2018
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
lordjeff05 wrote:Crizzle wrote:lordjeff05 wrote:With the season stopped now I’m fine with Ja getting it, but Zion was a better playing in both advanced stats and old school counting stats.
The Pels were waaaaay better with him on the floor.
What I will say is that Jah was better in the clutch which backs up the idea that because he’s a ball handler he can affect the game in major ways.
However, I will say that it’s important to note that the Warriors are the only team since the Pistons to win a chip when their best player was the point guard and Jay’s size will be an impediment his entire career.
Granted he’s just a rook but Jrue shut him down as a bigger more aggressive defender and there will be more of that Type of defense in the playoffs.
I feel JJJ has to max his potential and end up being the best of the two
JJJ is a prototype big and I am as excited as anyone about his potential. Are you saying he has a chance to be better than Jah or Zion? I don’t see that but you never know. He gives me a Rasheed Wallace vibe in so far as he has the potential to be able to do everything on both ends of the court but I don’t know if I see him consistently taking over games like Jah and Zion.
I don’t think people realize how dominant Zion was this year. Go look up how many rooks had his average points per game . Not impressed because of the short year? Go look at how many games he got over 25 points a game and compare it to any rookie of the last 30 years. Don’t care about counting stats? Look at his net rating.
At every level of competition Zion has been doubted and has dominated.
I think that if the grizzlies end up becoming true contenders, JJJ is gonna have to be the best player on the team. I think with his potential he will end up having more impact on winning than Ja. But thats just personal opinion
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,689
- And1: 3,579
- Joined: Nov 10, 2011
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
lordjeff05 wrote:Crizzle wrote:lordjeff05 wrote:With the season stopped now I’m fine with Ja getting it, but Zion was a better playing in both advanced stats and old school counting stats.
The Pels were waaaaay better with him on the floor.
What I will say is that Jah was better in the clutch which backs up the idea that because he’s a ball handler he can affect the game in major ways.
However, I will say that it’s important to note that the Warriors are the only team since the Pistons to win a chip when their best player was the point guard and Jay’s size will be an impediment his entire career.
Granted he’s just a rook but Jrue shut him down as a bigger more aggressive defender and there will be more of that Type of defense in the playoffs.
I feel JJJ has to max his potential and end up being the best of the two
JJJ is a prototype big and I am as excited as anyone about his potential. Are you saying he has a chance to be better than Jah or Zion? I don’t see that but you never know. He gives me a Rasheed Wallace vibe in so far as he has the potential to be able to do everything on both ends of the court but I don’t know if I see him consistently taking over games like Jah and Zion.
I don’t think people realize how dominant Zion was this year. Go look up how many rooks had his average points per game . Not impressed because of the short year? Go look at how many games he got over 25 points a game and compare it to any rookie of the last 30 years. Don’t care about counting stats? Look at his net rating.
At every level of competition Zion has been doubted and has dominated.
My running comp for JJJ is Dirk. I see him blossoming into an elite scorer.
Check out my Memphis Grizzlies Youtube Channel --->>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbB6yGykQEUwl9hqWYVp45g
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,261
- And1: 3,621
- Joined: Feb 21, 2008
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
Zion's peak is higher, but the body breaks down... Ja wins ROY and has the better, longer career.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,643
- And1: 9,804
- Joined: Sep 14, 2007
- Location: West Philly, PA
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:Ja is a guard. he's going to be more of a difference maker long term since he's probably going to handling the ball way more than Zion ever will. Zion will have some great years but i think his physical dominance will take a toll on his body long term. barring any injuries though, Ja is more likely a difference maker based on the guard-oriented league where you need elite guards to win the game.ILOVEIT wrote:This reminds me a lot of Curry or Griffin. I think the smaller Ja has the best chance of having a longer and sustainable impact to a championship type scenario. Zion, like Griffin, will have the more hype and highlights, but will VERY likely break down within 3-4 years. It's a fact: The body can not continue to sustain that level of athletic activity in such a heavy body. He needs to drop 20 lb's or he's in trouble. IMO
This seems incredibly prescriptive. The difference between a lower level star and a superstar are clear and generally have little to do with some differences of size or position or anything else. One of these players will end up simply being better and obviously more impactful at what they do, and that's what we're trying to talk about here.
Ja may have a little leg up because of position, but I actually think by far Ja's biggest limiting factor is volume--and volume is the only thing that guards/lead initiators have the big advantage with now. I won't elaborate now but I could very easily see Zion being able to carry much more volume than Ja.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,460
- And1: 8,719
- Joined: Jul 12, 2003
- Location: Boardman gets paid!
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
sfernald wrote:Or it could be more like the 2008 draft where Derrick Rose breaks himself down to a shadow of himself cause he's a guard and Brook Lopez a 7 footer is still playing strong.
I'm not Derrick Rose's biggest fan by any stretch but at a shadow of his former just had a significantly more productive season than Lopez did. Granted, Lopez got to play with Giannis and coach Bud which helped the total in the win category.
Bucket! Bucket!
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 8
- And1: 6
- Joined: May 15, 2020
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
Zion is a different breed
The point guard position overflows with talent every year, it's easier to find a good/star level point guard than a star level power forward
Zion also has more potential than Ja
I love Ja Morant and he's going to be a great player, but if we're talking about the next face of the league, Zion is up there for discussion.
The point guard position overflows with talent every year, it's easier to find a good/star level point guard than a star level power forward
Zion also has more potential than Ja
I love Ja Morant and he's going to be a great player, but if we're talking about the next face of the league, Zion is up there for discussion.
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Junior
- Posts: 447
- And1: 454
- Joined: Jan 14, 2020
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:ILOVEIT wrote:This reminds me a lot of Curry or Griffin. I think the smaller Ja has the best chance of having a longer and sustainable impact to a championship type scenario. Zion, like Griffin, will have the more hype and highlights, but will VERY likely break down within 3-4 years. It's a fact: The body can not continue to sustain that level of athletic activity in such a heavy body. He needs to drop 20 lb's or he's in trouble. IMO
Ja is a guard. he's going to be more of a difference maker long term since he's probably going to handling the ball way more than Zion ever will.
Have you ever seen Zion play? Just him being out there doing nothing has a massive positive impact on his team because the other team is always focused on stopping him. His gravity is ridiculous and he is only going to be a bigger impact when his ball handling gets better (right now when he puts the ball on the floor he either blows by everyone or loses it lol). Zion is bringing back old school bully ball and if he stays healthy he will be the better player. Ja being a PG doesn't mean he will be better. I would take prime Shaq over prime Nash any day of the week
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
- drosereturn
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,755
- And1: 1,495
- Joined: Oct 12, 2018
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
Boarman1 wrote:Zion is a different breed
The point guard position overflows with talent every year, it's easier to find a good/star level point guard than a star level power forward
Zion also has more potential than Ja
I love Ja Morant and he's going to be a great player, but if we're talking about the next face of the league, Zion is up there for discussion.
Health is 50% of the equation you missed out. Zion could be Griffin 2.0 as impressive as he is.
Lamelo will be a future superstar Bull. Book it. Lavar for president!
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,017
- And1: 817
- Joined: Mar 08, 2018
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
Ja could just as easily be Derrick Rose.Showtime23 wrote:Boarman1 wrote:Zion is a different breed
The point guard position overflows with talent every year, it's easier to find a good/star level point guard than a star level power forward
Zion also has more potential than Ja
I love Ja Morant and he's going to be a great player, but if we're talking about the next face of the league, Zion is up there for discussion.
Health is 50% of the equation you missed out. Zion could be Griffin 2.0 as impressive as he is.
Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,002
- And1: 535
- Joined: Jan 25, 2012
- Location: On The Road
Re: Rookie Discussion [19/20] [part II] Ja v Zion
I_Like_Dirt wrote:sfernald wrote:Or it could be more like the 2008 draft where Derrick Rose breaks himself down to a shadow of himself cause he's a guard and Brook Lopez a 7 footer is still playing strong.
I'm not Derrick Rose's biggest fan by any stretch but at a shadow of his former just had a significantly more productive season than Lopez did. Granted, Lopez got to play with Giannis and coach Bud which helped the total in the win category.
I disagree strongly here, Lopez is in the discussion for DPOY (or atleast should be) and rose is scoring 18ppg on 55%TS with bad defence on a +0.9 on/off while playing against bench units alot.
I'm not high on 2020 rose at all, or really any post injury rose for that matter.
Big Fan of / and (