Alize wrote:Lol, he is a better shooter than Michael, Lebron cracked 40% 3PFG on high volume shooting in a season, most of his clutch shots are threes, yet its mediocore, so Michael is a bad shooter i guess
LKN wrote:ssang wrote:Bingo. These people just cannot see the forest through the trees.
One thing I can guarantee - all the arguments they are making today will absolutely be used against them in 15-20 years.
If the league continues the way it has been people are going to laugh at the notion that someone who is a mediocre shooter like LeBron could ever really be that good (even though he absolutely is an ATG player)
Sent from my SM-G950F using
RealGM mobile app
Um MJ is a vastly better outside shooter than LeBron - you do realize outside shooting includes mid-range right?
Lebron's 3 point shooting for his career is below league average.... I mean I can cherry pick MJ stats if I want to make him look better too... it's not like he didn't have some pretty good 3 point shooting years.
Would you be shocked to learn that MJ shot 34.5% from 3 (from the normal line) for his career in the postseason vs 33.2% for Lebron?
The fact is LBJ would very likely have at least 1 more ring if he wasn't a poor mid range shooter.
MJ has a strong argument for best mid range shooter in NBA history (probably only rivaled by Dirk). LBJ isn't even on the list of great 3 point shooters.
Lebron is a career .368 shooter from 10-16 ft and .386 shooter from 16-3 pt.
In 1997 old MJ shot .492 from 10-16 and .521 from 16-3 pt.