ImageImage

Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Packers Talking Extension with Aaron Jones

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

MAC1987
Starter
Posts: 2,050
And1: 526
Joined: Jan 27, 2018

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#841 » by MAC1987 » Mon May 11, 2020 1:24 am

RRyder823 wrote:
MAC1987 wrote:Well, with AROD is there a possibility his contract can be restructured to sign our guys?
Profound23 wrote:
Yeah, we are screwed next year covid messes up the cap. With all the free agents coming up next year, I don't think we can't sign anyone.

I am really holding out hope we can retain at least Bakh (hoping last year was just a bad year) or Clark. I already assume King and Jones are gone.


Sent from my SM-T510 using RealGM mobile app
For one he just restructured not to long ago

Secondly unless its a strait paycut he'd be accepting it would just be extending his guarantees into the final 2 years of his deal. (Something I'm sure the Packers have little interest in doing post Love selection)

And finally Rodgers accepting a paycut would be extremely suprising considering he was pretty vocal about wanting a new deal when he felt underpaid (there's a reason why he got an extension when he had multiple years left) and I'm sure he isn't more open to the idea of a paycut post draft

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
Makes sense. if the NFL cap struggles in short term, might be good to move some of the money to a later year with the hopes of the cap increasing rhe following year.


Sent from my SM-G935V using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#842 » by M-C-G » Mon May 11, 2020 1:27 am

RRyder823 wrote:
MAC1987 wrote:Well, with AROD is there a possibility his contract can be restructured to sign our guys?
Profound23 wrote:
Yeah, we are screwed next year covid messes up the cap. With all the free agents coming up next year, I don't think we can't sign anyone.

I am really holding out hope we can retain at least Bakh (hoping last year was just a bad year) or Clark. I already assume King and Jones are gone.


Sent from my SM-T510 using RealGM mobile app
For one he just restructured not to long ago

Secondly unless its a strait paycut he'd be accepting it would just be extending his guarantees into the final 2 years of his deal. (Something I'm sure the Packers have little interest in doing post Love selection)

And finally Rodgers accepting a paycut would be extremely suprising considering he was pretty vocal about wanting a new deal when he felt underpaid (there's a reason why he got an extension when he had multiple years left) and I'm sure he isn't more open to the idea of a paycut post draft

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, I don't see a restructure happening, I think most likely scenario;
1. We have a two year out in the contract according to spotrac, with 14M hit in the first year we move/cut and 3M in the second
2. He plays one year and we trade him and as I recall from a PFT article it would somehow actually open up 5M in cap if we time it right
3.He plays three years and we move on with minimal cap damage
4. He play out all four years

If I was putting money on it, I think two years is about right, but certainly won't be shocked if he wants a trade after this season. I see about a 1% chance he plays out this contract
jakecronus8
RealGM
Posts: 16,746
And1: 8,160
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#843 » by jakecronus8 » Mon May 11, 2020 5:34 am

Three years makes the most sense to me. I think that’s what Green Bay’s hope is, at least.
Do it for Chuck
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,629
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#844 » by Profound23 » Mon May 11, 2020 11:26 pm

It is hard to speculate on how long to hold on to Aaron. If he regresses this year as much as he has the last 3 years, I am not sure how much longer anyone will want him on the team. The guy just hasn't looked the same since his last injury.
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,629
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#845 » by Profound23 » Tue May 12, 2020 3:36 am

Daver wrote:
Profound23 wrote:
RRyder823 wrote:You stop making sense

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app


Yeah, we are screwed next year covid messes up the cap. With all the free agents coming up next year, I don't think we can't sign anyone.

I am really holding out hope we can retain at least Bakh (hoping last year was just a bad year) or Clark. I already assume King and Jones are gone.



King gets hurt wiping his own ass as much as think he can be a top flight corner i think for the amount of money he has in his head that he wants i think the packers let him walk.
As for warford dude would look great at guard in GB as another poster said i hope they at least talk to his agent and do the noble TT thing and that is kick the tires.
Maybe im wrong probably am but if they really wanted to sign him they could make it work.Andrew brandt evrn mentioned that in a article


Not the biggest King fan. I think he is comparable to what we had at ILB with Barnett.....problem is he is our 2nd best CB and Josh Jackson hasn't been as good as I thought he would be.

I'm honestly shocked we didn't go CB, DT, RB knowing we won't be able to re-sign most of our free agents next year.

Don't get me wrong, I'm happy with Love....just thought that was the route they would go to pinch pennies.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,977
And1: 5,031
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers 

Post#846 » by RRyder823 » Tue May 12, 2020 4:52 am

Profound23 wrote:
Daver wrote:
Profound23 wrote:
Yeah, we are screwed next year covid messes up the cap. With all the free agents coming up next year, I don't think we can't sign anyone.

I am really holding out hope we can retain at least Bakh (hoping last year was just a bad year) or Clark. I already assume King and Jones are gone.



King gets hurt wiping his own ass as much as think he can be a top flight corner i think for the amount of money he has in his head that he wants i think the packers let him walk.
As for warford dude would look great at guard in GB as another poster said i hope they at least talk to his agent and do the noble TT thing and that is kick the tires.
Maybe im wrong probably am but if they really wanted to sign him they could make it work.Andrew brandt evrn mentioned that in a article


Not the biggest King fan. I think he is comparable to what we had at ILB with Barnett.....problem is he is our 2nd best CB and Josh Jackson hasn't been as good as I thought he would be.

I'm honestly shocked we didn't go CB, DT, RB knowing we won't be able to re-sign most of our free agents next year.

Don't get me wrong, I'm happy with Love....just thought that was the route they would go to pinch pennies.
I don't think its set in stone that King won't be back after this year. I'm not sure his price tag is going to be all that big with his injury history and he doesn't have the interception numbers to drive up the price.

Alot will depend on how Bahk plays this year. Clark is probably the only sure bet for a new deal and its going to cost. Bahk however is coming off a down year himself (although many have glossed over it) and age is a concern when it comes to giving him a 3rd contract.

If Bahk bounces back then I agree there probably isn't cap room for a player like King. If he doesn't I can pretty easily see a scenerio where the FO decides King + a FA is a more desirable path (especially considering the CB depth)

Jones is gone unless he misses time this year to drive down his price to the 7-8 range. (Or at least I "hope" we don't make the mistake of shelling out big bucks to a RB). Also this is a position they just invested a 2nd round pick in to



Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 462
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#847 » by Reddeye » Tue May 12, 2020 5:37 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#848 » by M-C-G » Tue May 12, 2020 6:29 pm

Reddeye wrote:
Read on Twitter


Really well written and well thought through article. Jacksonville would be interesting, but at the end of the day it seems destined for Rodgers to play for Gruden
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,086
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#849 » by Daver » Tue May 12, 2020 6:38 pm

M-C-G wrote:
Reddeye wrote:
Read on Twitter


Really well written and well thought through article. Jacksonville would be interesting, but at the end of the day it seems destined for Rodgers to play for Gruden


I absolutely agree very good article makes a great deal of sence and i also agree with you would love 2 top 15 picks for rodgers but i think if any team gets him i keep thinking raiders though with derrick carr makes a deal tougher not sure the raiders could beat that jax deal if it plays out that way
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#850 » by M-C-G » Tue May 12, 2020 6:44 pm

Daver wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
Reddeye wrote:
Read on Twitter


Really well written and well thought through article. Jacksonville would be interesting, but at the end of the day it seems destined for Rodgers to play for Gruden


I absolutely agree very good article makes a great deal of sence and i also agree with you would love 2 top 15 picks for rodgers but i think if any team gets him i keep thinking raiders though with derrick carr makes a deal tougher not sure the raiders could beat that jax deal if it plays out that way


After this season, I believe there is only a 2.5M cap hit on Derrick Carr. With one year of planning that wouldn't be too hard to make happen.

Interesting thinking of Jacksonville...if they suck, even if you got their first 1st, that second round pick would be very high as well.
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,086
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#851 » by Daver » Tue May 12, 2020 6:57 pm

Will be verrry interesting to see first loves improvement in first year n this Rodgers scenerio through this whole season
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#852 » by WeekapaugGroove » Tue May 12, 2020 8:03 pm

Reddeye wrote:
Read on Twitter
Good article. Basically after this season Rodgers time in GB is year to year with many factors involved.

My personal guess is it will be two years. Cap hit is a little less and this year could be very limited with practice time so might be hard to gauge how ready Love will be.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#853 » by M-C-G » Tue May 12, 2020 8:24 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Reddeye wrote:
Read on Twitter
Good article. Basically after this season Rodgers time in GB is year to year with many factors involved.

My personal guess is it will be two years. Cap hit is a little less and this year could be very limited with practice time so might be hard to gauge how ready Love will be.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app

Hard to see anything longer than 2 years. Like the article mentions if he has a good year and they have some level of confidence in Love, would be great to cash in on a big trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,839
And1: 1,947
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#854 » by Treebeard » Tue May 12, 2020 8:36 pm

As you guys noted, the article lays out good logic, but it's disheartening (to me anyway), all the same.
*******************************************************
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,086
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#855 » by Daver » Tue May 12, 2020 8:48 pm

Logan ryan 1 yr deal 4 million from what i read if thats it wow he would of been great in packers D as slot DB someone wake up BG please
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,766
And1: 29,619
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#856 » by Ron Swanson » Tue May 12, 2020 9:02 pm

The logic is sound in theory but it's entirely hinging on the belief that Love will already be ready to lead a Super Bowl contender by Year 2. That's a pretty big ask and not something I'm gonna bank on. Otherwise the whole idea of "cap savings" is meaningless. Too much focus on fitting a guy in this desired salary window to fit this convenient, theoretical blueprint (building a roster around a cheap QB contract) and not enough thought about the actual player or his development.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#857 » by M-C-G » Tue May 12, 2020 9:24 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:The logic is sound in theory but it's entirely hinging on the belief that Love will already be ready to lead a Super Bowl contender by Year 2. That's a pretty big ask and not something I'm gonna bank on. Otherwise the whole idea of "cap savings" is meaningless. Too much focus on fitting a guy in this desired salary window to fit this convenient, theoretical blueprint (building a roster around a cheap QB contract) and not enough thought about the actual player or his development.


I see where you are coming from, but in the example where we depart Rodgers after this season, we have 1 year of kind of being stuck financially, then the opportunity to build FA pieces in year 3,4 and 5 PLUS the draft picks you would get from Rodgers. I think that is the appeal, doubt anyone is expecting Super Bowl to be delivered in Love's first season.

I've already committed myself that Rodgers will not be here in 4 years, I am mentally and emotionally prepared for that. Is there a huge difference to me if it is 1 year from now or 2 years from now? Not really, not to me anyway.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 36,524
And1: 26,744
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#858 » by Matches Malone » Tue May 12, 2020 9:30 pm

Daver wrote:Logan ryan 1 yr deal 4 million from what i read if thats it wow he would of been great in packers D as slot DB someone wake up BG please


Free agency is a two-way street. Maybe he wanted to play for the Jets? He is from New Jersey. They need to stop playing games and just bring Tramon back. That's the real crime.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,525
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#859 » by M-C-G » Tue May 12, 2020 9:33 pm

Daver wrote:Logan ryan 1 yr deal 4 million from what i read if thats it wow he would of been great in packers D as slot DB someone wake up BG please


Sam Robinson wrote:The Dolphins were high on Ryan in March, but no deal commenced. The 29-year-old cornerback has remained in free agency for nearly two months.

A report earlier Tuesday indicated the Jets are expected to land Ryan, who still wants $10MM per year. That may be unrealistic at this point in the offseason, but the Jets have a far bigger need at corner than the Dolphins.


Guessing he was pricing himself out and had to take what he could get?
Daver
Head Coach
Posts: 7,086
And1: 2,707
Joined: Feb 23, 2019
       

Re: Packers 2020 Offseason Thread - Favre says Packers "burned bridge" with Rodgers 

Post#860 » by Daver » Tue May 12, 2020 10:07 pm

Matches Malone wrote:
Daver wrote:Logan ryan 1 yr deal 4 million from what i read if thats it wow he would of been great in packers D as slot DB someone wake up BG please


Free agency is a two-way street. Maybe he wanted to play for the Jets? He is from New Jersey. They need to stop playing games and just bring Tramon back. That's the real crime.



Agree with that tramon did a good job last year

Return to Green Bay Packers