HEZI wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Facts
Troy Brown still that n*gga! He can run the point better than Frank no cap
You guys just don't value defense enough. Mikal is turning into one of the best defensive players in the league. And he is not a liability on offense with a 62% ts%. He does a little of everything. At #9/#10, you are most likely getting just a solid starter and Mikal is turning into that.
Not bpa, but still better then Miles/Knox.
Knox pretty much is a liability on both ends. Miles is ok, but just not efficient. A player like Mikal is more valuable
It's a lot easier to appreciate Mikal when you realize he is who he is and you know what role he has. You plug him into lineup as a role player surrounded by stars and ask him to do two things and two things only, play defense on the perimeter and occasionally knock down a jumper, yeah there is value in that. You can do that when you have building blocks in place and stars capable of carrying the weight. You can't do that with a role player when you don't have the building pieces in place.
Mikal isn't even a lethal outside shooter. He averages 34% for his career on outside shots in 3 attempts a game. He's not even a sniper from deep, he's just capable but that's it. His efficiency comes from people sending traps on Booker or double teaming Ayton, so that's pretty easy to sneak in for a layup when all the attention is on your stars and nobody is really worried or cares about you scoring. Mikal isn't even a high end role player, he's on the lower end of it.
So in that regard, you can easily apply Miles and even Knox down the road as he gets better to play those types of roles. Wilson Chandler had a role on a winning Nuggets squad too. So I mean if we really want to talk value when we have to consider the amount of help that needs to be present for that value to really mean something, then you can really just take any NBA player and put them in that scenario.
True on needing stars, but odds are low on finding a star at #9/#10. Miles Bridges isnt a no star either last i checked
I dont see how he can be a good pick, and Mikal is a bad pick. I prefer Mikal, but they aren't that far apart either way. Its an ok pick for that range. It just is what it is in that the odds are low at finding a star.
And again, Mikal was coming around and Suns fans really seem to like him a lot.
24 games as a starter this year
11.4ppg/4.6rpg/2.7apg/1bpg/1.5spg/52%fg/42%3pt/66%ts, along with great defense and 1.5 3s a game.
Def benefits and is a nice fit on the sun's, but not everyone can do that and play great d.
Chandler was a good pick too. He was pretty decent before he got hurt.