thebuzzardman wrote:Frank could be a 12/6 PG and be an asset to most teams with the level of defense he plays, as a starter.
Of course, he'd be a better fit if a team had at least one big scorer.
Mostly, he probably profiles as a bench PG with some ability to back up 2 and 3. Not ideal for the 8th pick, but it happens and life goes on.
It's fairly established the Knicks will draft a PG.
Have that player start, have Frank back him up.
Pick one of DSJr or Trier to stay more than a couple of years, since both are basically scoring guards off the bench. Obviously DSJr is more a PG, Trier a SG, but Knicks can't carry 4 PG's - it's dumb. Edge Trier.
I'd also retain Dotson, since he actually defends and can shoot.
Retaining Dotson or Trier is HIGHLY dependent on how much $ they are asking/get offered by another team, and years.
I don't see a reason to commit to either long term. Meaning 2 year deals better, 3 if it really lowers the price.
As I've said before, there's also an argument for keeping DSJr as your backup PG instead of Frank.
I just figure on a team mostly devoid of players who can defend the perimeter to the extent it can be defended anymore, retain that player(s) at a reasonable. Price. This also depends on who the Knicks draft at PG. If LaMelo, Frank makes more sense. If Haliburton, there's a case for DSJr or Frank, but makes retaining DSJr more likely.
I keep Frank and Dotson no matter who we draft or sign in free agency or trade for. I think Dotson is so underrated by pretty much everyone and Frank was really showing confidence in himself the last 3 weeks or so of the season. We so quickly forget that we all knew Frank was green and young as hellz when we drafted and he was gonna need time and now many have lost the patience in waiting for Frank to develop. Lets not forget how much time he lost to injuries in his first couple of years as well so he lost all that time to adjust to the NBA as well.