GetBuLLish wrote:musiqsoulchild wrote:The rate you gave is for murders of black people by cops.
Now add in false imprisonment, bad traffic stops, illegal searches, illegal entry....and you will now start looking at a much larger percentage.
The point is NOT about murders.
Its about the abuse of law by people who are supposed to uphold the law.
And we havent even started talking about the judicial system. Let's not even go down that route. The number of black men and brown men and poor white men that have gone to jail just because the Public Defender was overworked and took the plea...you will never see these numbers.
It's all systemic rot.
The BLM movement is by and large based upon the lie that blacks are killed by cops at disproportionate rates than whites.
nope. not why it was formed, doesn't even show up on their website
The protests/riots we're seeing wouldn't be a 1/10th of what they are if everyone properly understood that there's no racial disparity in fatalities by cops.
fake news
I can post hundreds of videos, tweets, stories all promoting the lie.
first of all, what the hell possesses you to scour the internet for this stuff? second of all, you can find hundreds of instances of misinformation about anything under the sun. there are BILLIONS of tweets alone floating around out there. thirdly, a lie requires intentional deception. fourthly, any claim that race does not play a factor in police shooting requires perfect data and inherently relies on assumptions. are there racist cops? of course there are. it only stands to reason that that would manifest itself in every element of interactions with the black community. all else being equal, is a white racist cop even slightly more likely to kill a black person than a white person? of course! that's just common sense. the only rational question is "how MUCH more likely are blacks to be killed by cops." if you find data that suggests no bias at all, you should question the validity of that data or the methodology used to reach the conclusion
("maybe it is ME who has been mislead"). we know for a fact that black people are killed at a much higher rate. your ASSUMPTION is that that is ENTIRELY due to the similarly higher interaction rates. a 100% correlation between number of interactions and number of deaths cannot possibly be known. maybe police interactions with black people are disproportionately for BS reasons (like, i dunno, a woman in a park calling 911 while pretending to be assaulted by a black man who is actually bird watching). ADDITIONALLY, government data is incomplete! we do not even have complete and accurate data on police killings!
https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/03/06/dispatches-us-needs-better-data-police-killingsregardless, your monomaniacal obsession with police killings is just a distraction. BLM serves a good purpose no matter the "kill rates." it was created in response to an event that had nothing to do with police (so no, misconceptions about "kill rates" are not rationally the primary driver of their appeal to supporters). their purpose is opposition to white supremacy and ALL violence directed toward the black community from ALL sources. they are inclusive. they engage peacefully. theirs is an undeniably worthwhile mission. any disproportionate media coverage doesn't change that. going out of one's way to dismiss their mission is deranged. it makes people roll their eyes and ask the question "what the hell is this guy's endgame?"
you don't want large numbers of black people protesting. about anything. it makes you uncomfortable. you think that their advancement is your decline. that is the toxic origin of your rage. you rail against perceived misconceptions, yet puke out preposterous statements like "everybody participating in the protests is doing so due to media manipulation." this has little to do with data purity or media biases. you just use that stuff to form some semblance of intellectual justification for your hatred. just admit it. if not to us, to yourself