Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5

Moderator: lilfishi22

aggerrard
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,696
And1: 953
Joined: Nov 30, 2019
Location: Denmark
   

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1241 » by aggerrard » Tue Jun 2, 2020 6:22 pm

Jasen777 wrote:I only had Reyes winning, but I do think Jones got lucky with Santos' injury.

Maybe. Hard to say - Jon could've picked it up, if Santos were able to attack more. As i remember the fight it was pretty much Jon walking forward for 25 minutes with very little output from both. Santos threw more but Jones landed more and landed more effectively.
Jasen777
General Manager
Posts: 7,607
And1: 2,368
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1242 » by Jasen777 » Tue Jun 2, 2020 6:32 pm

aggerrard wrote:Maybe. Hard to say - Jon could've picked it up, if Santos were able to attack more. As i remember the fight it was pretty much Jon walking forward for 25 minutes with very little output from both. Santos threw more but Jones landed more and landed more effectively.


Santos won the first round and looked to be the better fighter before he got injured. Yes, Jones might have been able to turn it around but it's still quite fortunate for him that Santos got hurt.
aggerrard
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,696
And1: 953
Joined: Nov 30, 2019
Location: Denmark
   

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1243 » by aggerrard » Tue Jun 2, 2020 6:36 pm

Jasen777 wrote:
aggerrard wrote:Maybe. Hard to say - Jon could've picked it up, if Santos were able to attack more. As i remember the fight it was pretty much Jon walking forward for 25 minutes with very little output from both. Santos threw more but Jones landed more and landed more effectively.


Santos won the first round and looked to be the better fighter before he got injured. Yes, Jones might have been able to turn it around but it's still quite fortunate for him that Santos got hurt.

I don't disagree with that.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,718
And1: 67,376
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1244 » by Duke4life831 » Tue Jun 2, 2020 7:11 pm

aggerrard wrote:Question. Jones vs Reyes, Gus and Santos. Which of those do you guys think he lost - and if you think he lost some of them, what are your argument for him losing?


He lost to Reyes, I watched that fight again I think it was a clear 3-2 to Reyes. The Santos fight is extremely tight in my opinion. But Ive got no issue with siding with the champ in such a close fight. I also think he beat Gus as well. So in my opinion in those 3 fights he's 1-1-1 (I'm cool with calling the Santos one a draw or notching to the loss or win column, it was that close in my opinion).
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,382
And1: 67,144
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1245 » by Dupp » Fri Jun 5, 2020 8:37 pm

Jorge putting out a lot of tweets about pay dispute between him and the ufc right now.


Read on Twitter



This one in particular I assume is referring to usman? Is he really that bad of a draw compared to Nate? I get it but seems funny because the fight would most likely be way better.


He also retweeted someone who tweeted out the revenue sharing between the ufc and the fighters. They said the revenue split was like 16-84 fighters - ufc spit. Compared that nba and nfl etc where the spilt is basically 50-50.

Are those numbers true or close to being accurate? If so it’s pretty poor for the fighters. He also tweeted “ never made a dollar on a ticket you sell” Does he mean at the gate or Ppv too? Basically I’m wondering if he’s only ever gotten the base rate and nothing else.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1246 » by REDDzone » Fri Jun 5, 2020 8:58 pm

Dupp wrote:Jorge putting out a lot of tweets about pay dispute between him and the ufc right now.


Read on Twitter



This one in particular I assume is referring to usman? Is he really that bad of a draw compared to Nate? I get it but seems funny because the fight would most likely be way better.


He also retweeted someone who tweeted out the revenue sharing between the ufc and the fighters. They said the revenue split was like 16-84 fighters - ufc spit. Compared that nba and nfl etc where the spilt is basically 50-50.

Are those numbers true or close to being accurate? If so it’s pretty poor for the fighters. He also tweeted “ never made a dollar on a ticket you sell” Does he mean at the gate or Ppv too? Basically I’m wondering if he’s only ever gotten the base rate and nothing else.


Not sure if he got PPV points for Nate fight but would never have gotten them before that because he never headlined a PPV, right?

This was a point brought up by Ariel. The fighters have never received a portion of the gate from the UFC. So the UFC's argument to not pay because of lower gates is oftentimes falling on deaf ears.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,382
And1: 67,144
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1247 » by Dupp » Fri Jun 5, 2020 9:30 pm

REDDzone wrote:
Dupp wrote:Jorge putting out a lot of tweets about pay dispute between him and the ufc right now.


Read on Twitter



This one in particular I assume is referring to usman? Is he really that bad of a draw compared to Nate? I get it but seems funny because the fight would most likely be way better.


He also retweeted someone who tweeted out the revenue sharing between the ufc and the fighters. They said the revenue split was like 16-84 fighters - ufc spit. Compared that nba and nfl etc where the spilt is basically 50-50.

Are those numbers true or close to being accurate? If so it’s pretty poor for the fighters. He also tweeted “ never made a dollar on a ticket you sell” Does he mean at the gate or Ppv too? Basically I’m wondering if he’s only ever gotten the base rate and nothing else.


Not sure if he got PPV points for Nate fight but would never have gotten them before that because he never headlined a PPV, right?

This was a point brought up by Ariel. The fighters have never received a portion of the gate from the UFC. So the UFC's argument to not pay because of lower gates is oftentimes falling on deaf ears.




Yeah I figured he would have got something more for the Nate fight but I dunno.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,153
And1: 20,203
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1248 » by NO-KG-AI » Fri Jun 5, 2020 11:18 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
aggerrard wrote:Question. Jones vs Reyes, Gus and Santos. Which of those do you guys think he lost - and if you think he lost some of them, what are your argument for him losing?


He lost to Reyes, I watched that fight again I think it was a clear 3-2 to Reyes. The Santos fight is extremely tight in my opinion. But Ive got no issue with siding with the champ in such a close fight. I also think he beat Gus as well. So in my opinion in those 3 fights he's 1-1-1 (I'm cool with calling the Santos one a draw or notching to the loss or win column, it was that close in my opinion).


How do you feel about GSP vs Hendricks?
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,718
And1: 67,376
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1249 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Jun 5, 2020 11:21 pm

NO-KG-AI wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
aggerrard wrote:Question. Jones vs Reyes, Gus and Santos. Which of those do you guys think he lost - and if you think he lost some of them, what are your argument for him losing?


He lost to Reyes, I watched that fight again I think it was a clear 3-2 to Reyes. The Santos fight is extremely tight in my opinion. But Ive got no issue with siding with the champ in such a close fight. I also think he beat Gus as well. So in my opinion in those 3 fights he's 1-1-1 (I'm cool with calling the Santos one a draw or notching to the loss or win column, it was that close in my opinion).


How do you feel about GSP vs Hendricks?


Its been awhile since I watched that one. Im a massive GSP homer so I still think I tell myself GSP barely scratched that one out. But ya probably deep down think Hendricks won. But again haven't watched it in years.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,153
And1: 20,203
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1250 » by NO-KG-AI » Fri Jun 5, 2020 11:27 pm

Jasen777 wrote:
aggerrard wrote:Maybe. Hard to say - Jon could've picked it up, if Santos were able to attack more. As i remember the fight it was pretty much Jon walking forward for 25 minutes with very little output from both. Santos threw more but Jones landed more and landed more effectively.


Santos won the first round and looked to be the better fighter before he got injured. Yes, Jones might have been able to turn it around but it's still quite fortunate for him that Santos got hurt.


I want to see a Santos rematch just because it was tainted by injury, but I honestly can't even remember the last time Jones looked great in a first round, and he loses the first round to almost everyone while he's probing.

aggerrard wrote:
cowboyronnie wrote:He definitely lost in some moral sense against Santos, given that Santos had no knees for like 4 rounds.

I can't remember how tight I thought the Reyes fight was. He clearly won the first couple but I think I may have given Jon the last 3, as Reyes's movement slowed down.

It's tough to watch them unbiased, given that we are all giddy about, a) someone actually competing with Jon athletically, b) the prospect of that prick losing. His opponent's successes become a little too salient, I think.

That's fair and i agree on the points you are making.

The reason i'm asking is, it seems like alot of those who thinks Jones lost all three fight are using media scores and punches landed as the only arguments for why Reyes won. But if that's how you judge it, then Jones won way more convincingly against both Gus and Santos.

My bias did lean me towards Jones in the Reyes fight. But honestly trying to wipe my bias and pride to the side, i think Reyes had those first three round. He outlanded Jones and landed the cleaner punches. In the Gus and Santos fight though, i really don't see the argument for Jones losing - based on the rules of the octagon.


I think you might be right by MMA scoring standards, but Gustaffson is the only one that ever really had Jon on his heels and having to fight desperate to me, and had to dig in to stave off losing. He never really seemed in danger in the Santos or Reyes fight to me, except maybe in danger of losing a close round to Reyes that could swing the fight.

I think we all don't love the 10-9 must system, but Reyes only looked clearly better in round 1 IMO. He was pretty much toast and hanging on by round 4-5, and 2-3 were close enough where you shouldn't be trying to coast on the idea that you won those.

It would leave a bad taste in my mouth if a guy blew his load to take 1-3, and the other guy was still fresh and unharmed, and then the guy who took 1-3 just tried to hang on and keep from getting finished to win 4-5 and take a prestigious title.

I think much like the DC and Gus fight (the only rematches Jon has), if they threw Reyes back in there, the fight is going to look a lot more like rounds 3-5 than round 1 now that Jon and his camp have a beat on Reyes. I just don't think he's talented enough to beat Jon in a rematch without the element of surprise.

LHW is boring for Jon, all the real challenges and question marks are at HW IMO. Jon is way more vulnerable on a fresh matchup and early in fights than he is in later rounds or rematches.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,153
And1: 20,203
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1251 » by NO-KG-AI » Fri Jun 5, 2020 11:30 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
NO-KG-AI wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
He lost to Reyes, I watched that fight again I think it was a clear 3-2 to Reyes. The Santos fight is extremely tight in my opinion. But Ive got no issue with siding with the champ in such a close fight. I also think he beat Gus as well. So in my opinion in those 3 fights he's 1-1-1 (I'm cool with calling the Santos one a draw or notching to the loss or win column, it was that close in my opinion).


How do you feel about GSP vs Hendricks?


Its been awhile since I watched that one. Im a massive GSP homer so I still think I tell myself GSP barely scratched that one out. But ya probably deep down think Hendricks won. But again haven't watched it in years.


Fair, I asked because I feel like I am biased about Jones and more clear on GSP, and you're the opposite, and it was super controversial, close decision, so I was curious lol.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
aggerrard
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,696
And1: 953
Joined: Nov 30, 2019
Location: Denmark
   

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1252 » by aggerrard » Sat Jun 6, 2020 7:05 pm

How would y'all rank the divisions from strongest to weakest at the top - only contenders of certain lvl taken into consideration? A-C level - C lvl still being great. A lvl = 3 points, B lvl = 2 points and C lvl = 1 point.

Mine is:

1. 170lb, welterweight:
A. Usman
B. Colby, Burns, Masvidal, Edwards
C. Wonderboy, Chiesa, Nate, Neal, Luque, Pettis, Cerrone, Lawler, RDA, Maia, Woodley, Silva (Claudio)

=23 points

2. 155lb, lightweight:
A. Khabib, Gaethje, Ferguson, Conor
B. Poirier
C. Hooker, Oliveira, Makhachev, Felder, Ferreira

=19 points

3. 185lb, middleweight:
A. Izzy
B. Whittaker, Costa, Cannonier, Romero
C. Gastelum, Till, Hermansson, Shahbazyan, Brunson

=16 points

4. 265lb, heavyweight:
A. Miocic, Cormier
B. Ngannou, Blaydes
C. JDS, Lewis, Volkov, Overeem, Rozenstruik

=15 points

5. 145lb, featherweight:
A. Volkanovski
B. Holloway, Zabit, Korean Zombie
C. Ortega, Kattar, Yair, Edgar, Emmett

=14 points

6.1. 205lb, light heavyweight:
A. Jones
B. Reyes, Santos
C. Glover, Jan, Rakic, Oezdemir, Smith, Corey

=13 points

6.2. 135lb, bantamweight:
A. none
B. Moraes, Yan, Aldo
C. Cruz, Garbrandt, Munhoz, Rivera, Assuncao, Sterling, Sandhagen

=13 points

8. 125lb, flyweight:
A. none
B. Figueiredo, Benavidez
C. Moreno, Askarov

=6 points

Female:

1. 115lb, strawweight:
A. Zhang
B. Rose, Andrade, Joanna, Tatiana
C. Gadelha, Ribas, Esparza, Hill, Waterson, Xiaonan, Rodriguez, Calvillo

=19 points

2. 135lb, bantamweight:
A. Nunes
B. GDR
C. Ladd, Aldana, Vieira, Pennington, Pena, Holm

=11 points

3. 125lb, flyweight:
A. Valentina
B. none
C. Chookagian

=4 points

I could probably include some fighters and exclude some. But this is just my view after a quick rundown on the divisions.
Jasen777
General Manager
Posts: 7,607
And1: 2,368
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1253 » by Jasen777 » Sat Jun 6, 2020 7:38 pm

Think you have HW overrated, especially if you consider depth (which to be fair you aren't). 205 will give 125 a race for the last spot if Jones is gone.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,718
And1: 67,376
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1254 » by Duke4life831 » Sat Jun 6, 2020 8:02 pm

155 and 170 is a wash to me because so many of those guys are bouncing back and forth now. 265 is by far the worst division for men. Its practically Stipe, DC and Francis. That is the entire division right now and DC only plans on fighting 1 more time.
Headliner
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 36,746
And1: 1,981
Joined: Oct 31, 2001
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1255 » by Headliner » Sat Jun 6, 2020 9:24 pm

NO-KG-AI wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
NO-KG-AI wrote:
How do you feel about GSP vs Hendricks?


Its been awhile since I watched that one. Im a massive GSP homer so I still think I tell myself GSP barely scratched that one out. But ya probably deep down think Hendricks won. But again haven't watched it in years.


Fair, I asked because I feel like I am biased about Jones and more clear on GSP, and you're the opposite, and it was super controversial, close decision, so I was curious lol.



I rewatched GSP vs Hendrix yesterday. GSP won. I remember watching it live and thinking differently but the only round that was contentious was round one, all other four were clear and unanimous amongst the judges.

2,4 were Hendrix, and 1,3,5 were GSP.

Hendrix had the more dominant rounds clearly winning two which makes it harder, because GSP barely won rounds 1 and 3.

Round 1 was close though, Hendrix was also landing face shots while GSP was landing body shots. Body shots don’t reflect damage taken, where as Head shots from a guy like Hendrix leave you like the elephant man.

What a close fight though, one of the closest I’ve ever seen.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,153
And1: 20,203
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1256 » by NO-KG-AI » Sat Jun 6, 2020 10:56 pm

My take on it at the time was that Hendricks definitely won a fight, and if I had to be one guy in a fistfight, I would have rather been Hendricks, but rewatching it and scoring rounds more carefully, and by MMA ruleset, GSP won the fight in a tight decision.

I was watching GSP talk about that fight on Rogan's podcast this morning, and he said that all the fighting about more testing with the UFC and Hendricks was weighing on him so heavily that he wished he had the courage to just turn the fight down.

Since he was like so obviously correct, and it almost cost him his title against a bum like Hendricks that didn't deserve the distinction of getting one on GSP, I felt really bad for him for the whole situation.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Jasen777
General Manager
Posts: 7,607
And1: 2,368
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1257 » by Jasen777 » Sat Jun 6, 2020 11:02 pm

NO-KG-AI wrote:Since he was like so obviously correct, and it almost cost him his title against a bum like Hendricks that didn't deserve the distinction of getting one on GSP, I felt really bad for him for the whole situation.


All 16 media scores had it 48-47 Hendricks. I don't think the judges result correctly reflected the fight. Nevertheless the right man won.
Jasen777
General Manager
Posts: 7,607
And1: 2,368
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1258 » by Jasen777 » Sun Jun 7, 2020 5:45 am

Well Conor is retired again.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,382
And1: 67,144
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1259 » by Dupp » Sun Jun 7, 2020 7:22 am

:lol: what was the point of coming back? He don’t want any of khabib or Justin
Headliner
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 36,746
And1: 1,981
Joined: Oct 31, 2001
 

Re: Non-threadworthy MMA Rumors/Quotes/Tweets/Etc., Vol. 5 

Post#1260 » by Headliner » Sun Jun 7, 2020 1:22 pm

Dupp wrote::lol: what was the point of coming back? He don’t want any of khabib or Justin


I think he wanted both of them lol
I don’t think the ufc wanted to pay or book him elsewhere

Return to Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts