Fair if true. I'm talking about the eye test. Just been watching some recorded games recently and he doesnt seem to move the ball well. In the end I think Suns end up paying probably more than he is worth - which is okay and par for the course in the NBA. But if a better fit is available at a lower cost or even multiple lower cost players that fit better and fill specific roles, I would absolutely make a move.Walt_Uoob wrote:jredsaz wrote:I like Oubre and I think we could keep him at a salary that's probably going to reflect AGs contract starting in 2021.Blonde wrote:Mikal’s defensive value largely comes from his ability to defend 1-3. He clamped Luka as well as anyone I’ve seen this season, and punishes smaller guards. He’s not a tier 1 perimeter defender but he’s probably in the 2nd tier, and being able to put him on 1s unlocks lineups that wouldn’t otherwise be possible. I’d love to see Booker-Bridges-Cam-Oubre-Ayton minutes in the Orlando games.
Having multiple good players at the wing position is not a bad thing. That’s how you win in this league. We’ve got plenty of room for both Bridges and Oubre with bird rights.
But he is somewhat of a ball stopper. Not great vision. Not a consistent defender. Not a great shooter. Not super efficient. I feel like if the Suns can add a player - whether through trade or acquired cap space - that is better at those things but not as good as a primary scorer I would take it.
Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
Didn't someone step in recently with some stats kind of debunking the idea of Oubre being a ball stopper? I went through the last several pages and couldn't find the post, but I thought I read that by the numbers, he moves the ball pretty well.
Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app






















