Moderators: ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris
R-DAWG wrote:The real issue with Ingram is he needs the ball to be effective. He was not great next to Lebron, whereas a guy like Kuzma is much better in the off the ball, make quick decisions/shots roll.
Ingram has been excellent, and will get a max contract from someone. But he's not a fit on every roster.
bran muffin wrote:R-DAWG wrote:The real issue with Ingram is he needs the ball to be effective. He was not great next to Lebron, whereas a guy like Kuzma is much better in the off the ball, make quick decisions/shots roll.
Ingram has been excellent, and will get a max contract from someone. But he's not a fit on every roster.
It will be interesting to see if Ingram can maintain this level of play once Zion is back in the lineup.
Patsfan1081 wrote:getitdone323 wrote:Countless people on this site, neckbeard twitter, and excel sheet twitter told me that Ingram was not a good player and he was tiers below Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown. I wish i bookmarked some of the pages, but one guy literally wrote an essay using BI's metrics to show that he will amount to a below average to average player. These same people would laugh at us lakers fans when we kept telling you he would be good, but all that mattered was his advanced stats VORP, PER, etc
He can score at all 3 levels efficiently now, be a playmaker/ even run your offense, and still play solid defense when has to (dropped a bit this season, but in a new system)
...but if he was still laker, people will find anything to dismiss his success.
NOP didnt even give him an offer, i hope he tells Griffin to go **** himself
Get your bag BI, you deserve it.
No, stats said he wasn't as good of a prospect, and it was just advanced like Vorp or ws. He had a negative rpm every season he was in L.A. Has he even played a dozen games yet? Is this supposed to wash away the 50x sample size?
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:If they don't want to max him he'd look great with RJ.
You're allowed to dream but don't hurt yourself because he's staying in New Orleans.Infinitimind wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:If they don't want to max him he'd look great with RJ.
Yes we can dream
arh1109 wrote:No way he's just a stat padder
ADMVP wrote:You're allowed to dream but don't hurt yourself because he's staying in New Orleans.Infinitimind wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:If they don't want to max him he'd look great with RJ.
Yes we can dream
Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
arh1109 wrote:No way he's just a stat padder
Letting Ingram go now probably does more damage to the profit margin in seasons to come. Also, no one on the team wants to see that and we haven't had a good starting wing since Stojakovic.Infinitimind wrote:ADMVP wrote:You're allowed to dream but don't hurt yourself because he's staying in New Orleans.Infinitimind wrote:
Yes we can dream
Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
I’m dreaming because I keeping hearing how the COVID 19 is going to affect small ownership and the cap might be lower. Plus the fact that they are already talking no fans next year owners might not want to spent. Hey I’m a knicks fan and god knows we need to catch a break. But I agreed he worth the max and the pelicans should do everything to keep him
Alonzo_Morning wrote:arh1109 wrote:No way he's just a stat padder
Das bait
arh1109 wrote:Alonzo_Morning wrote:arh1109 wrote:No way he's just a stat padder
Das bait
Backseat moderator
Jester_ wrote:Hot take: Moses Moody shows the potential to be a star/#2 option ala Lauri Markkanen. Both the eye test and the advanced stats show a player with extremely high slope.
Duke4life831 wrote:24/6/4 on 59 TS%, All Star in the west, significant improvement every year and still only 22 years old. Ya he's getting a max deal.
