PlayerUp wrote:dice wrote:obama +6
bush sr. -10
carter -20
Not sure where you're getting this +6 on Obama.
approve minus disapprove. has nothing to do with election polling
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10
PlayerUp wrote:dice wrote:obama +6
bush sr. -10
carter -20
Not sure where you're getting this +6 on Obama.
PlayerUp wrote:dice wrote:perot did not have a political party
Sure he did. He only officially announced he was a supporter of the republican party in 2000. He was always leaning republican.
PlayerUp wrote:musiqsoulchild wrote:Would you rather 100% support a candidate who has an agenda that covers 70% of what you ean to see?
I haven't made a decision yet. I live in one of the big swing states and I voted Gary Johnson in 2016 but I won't be doing that again. There are more "Green' and "Libertian" supporters than ever before but in a general election as of now they stand no chance. It would be nice to have a 4 party system it would fix alot of issues but it isn't going to happen anytime soon.
Since I don't like either politician, I am going to do the Tim Pool approach / what many moderates are likely to do and that is wait and see what happens on the debate stage and go with the one who has the best 4 year plan with policies. If Joe goes far left and/or starts flip flopping, I'm out. I'll have to vote Trump and just put up with 4 years of nothing getting done with the house blocking him which is better than radical policies potentially being implemented. If Joe presents decent policies that I can see passed by congress, Ill go with Joe. I'm not going to just give in and vote Joe to get rid of Trump. That's ridiculous. He should earn our vote.
PlayerUp wrote:dice wrote:as for nikki haley, trump attacked her for requesting that he release his taxes while a candidate. then when he won the nomination she said she'd vote for him but was "not a fan." of course, after elected, trump then made her ambassador to the UN. so i don't think her relationship w/ trump would hurt her
I don't think Nikki Haley deep down is a Trump supporter. She didn't support him when he was running in 2016 and demanded he release his tax returns. There were discussions about Trump replacing Pence with her for the VP spot in 2020 but I don't think she would consider that and get a potentially bad rep which is the right move. However politics is and should be all about adjustments. Sometimes you have to agree and give into things you don't necessarily support.

Player Up wrote:I'll have to vote Trump and just put up with 4 years of nothing getting done with the house blocking him which is better than radical policies potentially being implemented. If Joe presents decent policies that I can see passed by congress, Ill go with Joe. I'm not going to just give in and vote Joe to get rid of Trump. That's ridiculous. He should earn our vote.
PlayerUp wrote:TheStig wrote:I agree, except I think the incumbent has an advantage. Clinton, Bush and Obama all got 2 terms.
and Bush senior lost because well you can debate if Perot was the reason or not. Perot who died last year was a republican who gave it his best effort to transform our political system into a 3 party system.
musiqsoulchild wrote:PlayerUp wrote:musiqsoulchild wrote:Would you rather 100% support a candidate who has an agenda that covers 70% of what you ean to see?
I haven't made a decision yet. I live in one of the big swing states and I voted Gary Johnson in 2016 but I won't be doing that again. There are more "Green' and "Libertian" supporters than ever before but in a general election as of now they stand no chance. It would be nice to have a 4 party system it would fix alot of issues but it isn't going to happen anytime soon.
Since I don't like either politician, I am going to do the Tim Pool approach / what many moderates are likely to do and that is wait and see what happens on the debate stage and go with the one who has the best 4 year plan with policies. If Joe goes far left and/or starts flip flopping, I'm out. I'll have to vote Trump and just put up with 4 years of nothing getting done with the house blocking him which is better than radical policies potentially being implemented. If Joe presents decent policies that I can see passed by congress, Ill go with Joe. I'm not going to just give in and vote Joe to get rid of Trump. That's ridiculous. He should earn our vote.
So, you'll be voting for Trump most likely. And that's your prerogative.
dice wrote:TheStig wrote:PlayerUp wrote:
Privately the senate is working on getting dirt against Biden right now. It's not being talked about but eventually closer to the election they'll go all out on Biden. Simply put Biden has an uphill battle to go himself and who knows how this is going to pan out.
This is the most unpredictable election possibly in our lifetime. From the senate, to house to the white house, we really don't truly know the outcome of what's going to happen. 2020 has been one of the darkest years ever and I personally think it's going to get worse as we start getting closer to election time. I don't think experts or polls should even be looked at and I'm giving 50-50 odds to both parties right now.
I agree, except I think the incumbent has an advantage. Clinton, Bush and Obama all got 2 terms.
all were popular presidents when re-elected![]()
approval ratings heading into re-election bid:
ike +60
johnson +53
truman +35
roosevelt +34 (third re-election)
nixon +34
reagan +30
clinton +18
ford +15 (lost re-election, but not seen as rightful office holder to begin with)
dubya +9
obama +6
bush sr. -10
carter -20
popular presidents get a second term almost by definition. unpopular presidents usually don't. donald trump has NEVER hit 50% job approval and he is currently about 14 points underwater. he was even worse off heading into the last election, but clinton was almost as bad. biden is barely underwater over the last several weeks
dice wrote:Ccwatercraft wrote:PlayerUp wrote:
Option A: An older bought politician that has a history of racist issues, sexual allegations, corruption and failed presidential runs with very limited accomplishments.
Option B: A young ambitious politician that has no history of issues and has a great plan moving forward.
Option B was essentially Obama in 2008 which is why he won by a huge margin over a well respected McCain. Option A is Biden. Who you taking? Obviously the majority will go with Option B.
I honestly didnt think it was possible to put up a candidate worse than Hillary, yet the dem's pulled it off quite spectacularly and somehow talked the other candidates into walking away.
the voters made these decisions, not the party. nobody ended their campaign who was still a viable candidate. and bernie again stuck around well past his expiration date
as for hillary, she has gotten more votes than her opponent in every election she has ever run in. including against obama in the 2008 primaries
Dresden wrote:Even if Biden is in mental decline, he's still 10x better than Trump. Listen to Trump try to put together a sentence- he has trouble doing it. he is constantly mispronouncing words and getting facts wrong.
I honestly believe if Hillary were president, we'd have seen far fewer American deaths from COVID. Right now, we are 5% of the population, and have 24% of the world's COVID deaths. That's outrageous, for a country that is supposed to have the best medical system in the world.
Red8911 wrote:PlayerUp wrote:dice wrote:as for nikki haley, trump attacked her for requesting that he release his taxes while a candidate. then when he won the nomination she said she'd vote for him but was "not a fan." of course, after elected, trump then made her ambassador to the UN. so i don't think her relationship w/ trump would hurt her
I don't think Nikki Haley deep down is a Trump supporter. She didn't support him when he was running in 2016 and demanded he release his tax returns. There were discussions about Trump replacing Pence with her for the VP spot in 2020 but I don't think she would consider that and get a potentially bad rep which is the right move. However politics is and should be all about adjustments. Sometimes you have to agree and give into things you don't necessarily support.
If you remember a lot of Republicans were going against trump when he first started running. Trump even had to fight against his own party to become president, that’s why it was even more impressive that he won and shows that people love him.
Ccwatercraft wrote:The bottom line is that the worst possible candidate was chosen, he's in severe mental decline and no longer capable of handling the job he's running for. Its obvious to most of us paying attention, and will become obvious to the rest as time goes on.
Jeffster81 wrote:Dresden wrote:Even if Biden is in mental decline, he's still 10x better than Trump. Listen to Trump try to put together a sentence- he has trouble doing it. he is constantly mispronouncing words and getting facts wrong.
I honestly believe if Hillary were president, we'd have seen far fewer American deaths from COVID. Right now, we are 5% of the population, and have 24% of the world's COVID deaths. That's outrageous, for a country that is supposed to have the best medical system in the world.
Hillary could not beat Obama. Like Trump, Hillary should be in prison. So she, imo, was never a viable option. Trump is an idiot but Biden is not the answer either. I don't have the answer but apparently neither do the Hypocrats or the Bloodicans.

Dresden wrote:Even if Biden is in mental decline, he's still 10x better than Trump. Listen to Trump try to put together a sentence- he has trouble doing it. he is constantly mispronouncing words and getting facts wrong.
I honestly believe if Hillary were president, we'd have seen far fewer American deaths from COVID. Right now, we are 5% of the population, and have 24% of the world's COVID deaths. That's outrageous, for a country that is supposed to have the best medical system in the world.

Ccwatercraft wrote:dice wrote:Ccwatercraft wrote:
I honestly didnt think it was possible to put up a candidate worse than Hillary, yet the dem's pulled it off quite spectacularly and somehow talked the other candidates into walking away.
the voters made these decisions, not the party. nobody ended their campaign who was still a viable candidate. and bernie again stuck around well past his expiration date
as for hillary, she has gotten more votes than her opponent in every election she has ever run in. including against obama in the 2008 primaries
right, Dems. Dem voters, Dem party, whatever.
The bottom line is that the worst possible candidate was chosen, he's in severe mental decline and no longer capable of handling the job he's running for. Its obvious to most of us paying attention, and will become obvious to the rest as time goes on.
TheEndIsNigh wrote:Red8911 wrote:PlayerUp wrote:
I don't think Nikki Haley deep down is a Trump supporter. She didn't support him when he was running in 2016 and demanded he release his tax returns. There were discussions about Trump replacing Pence with her for the VP spot in 2020 but I don't think she would consider that and get a potentially bad rep which is the right move. However politics is and should be all about adjustments. Sometimes you have to agree and give into things you don't necessarily support.
If you remember a lot of Republicans were going against trump when he first started running. Trump even had to fight against his own party to become president, that’s why it was even more impressive that he won and shows that people love him.
That is not what it shows.
Dresden wrote:Jeffster81 wrote:Dresden wrote:Even if Biden is in mental decline, he's still 10x better than Trump. Listen to Trump try to put together a sentence- he has trouble doing it. he is constantly mispronouncing words and getting facts wrong.
I honestly believe if Hillary were president, we'd have seen far fewer American deaths from COVID. Right now, we are 5% of the population, and have 24% of the world's COVID deaths. That's outrageous, for a country that is supposed to have the best medical system in the world.
Hillary could not beat Obama. Like Trump, Hillary should be in prison. So she, imo, was never a viable option. Trump is an idiot but Biden is not the answer either. I don't have the answer but apparently neither do the Hypocrats or the Bloodicans.
What did Hillary do that she should be put in prison? Her emails? Colin Powell admitted to doing the same thing. Trump's daughter was recently caught doing the same thing.
moorhosj wrote:Ccwatercraft wrote:The bottom line is that the worst possible candidate was chosen, he's in severe mental decline and no longer capable of handling the job he's running for. Its obvious to most of us paying attention, and will become obvious to the rest as time goes on.
Which candidate are you talking about here?