Offers for Knox?

Post #1 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:01 pm

In not much of a surprise, sounds like he could be available.

TPV · Post #2 » by **TPV** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:07 pm

I think OKC should offer up their 2020 2nd from Chicago, and another future pick (or possibly the Denver 2020 1st).

Knox at least has shown some scoring ability and he's young. I think OKC could at least turn him into a useful rotation player with the potential for even more.

Buzzard · Post #3 » by **Buzzard** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:08 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:In not much of a surprise, sounds like he could be available.

Read on Twitter

For whatever reason? Lets start with shooting .359 from the field in his 2nd season.

rugbyrugger23 · Post #4 » by **rugbyrugger23** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:09 pm

I think Wolves would do #33 and Spellman or Vanderbilt or Evans.

BlazersBroncos · Post #5 » by **BlazersBroncos** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:12 pm

Even with Portland needing a long term fit at SF, I wouldn't move anything of note for him. I would rather see if Gary Trent Jr can shore up that spot and he is more of a SG. But, at least he has shown an efficient offensive trait, good 3PT shooting. Knox can score if given usage that he absolutely doesn't deserve.

Post #6 » by **Texas Chuck** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:13 pm

If I'm a tanking team I'd be willing to add him but I can't imagine giving up a top 45 pick for him. Maybe I give up a "prospect" I've already concluded can't play.

Post #7 » by **gswhoops** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:15 pm

Maybe a young team with nothing to lose would offer a second for him. That’s about all I can envision.

Post #8 » by **loserX** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:22 pm

Sacramento has capspace and more 2nds than they can roster. That might be a fit if they want to gamble.

Post #9 » by **Duffman100** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:27 pm

I'd like for the Raps to take a flyer on his skillset, but like above, I'm not giving up anything of value for him. A 2nd rounder, but that's also tough with how Ujiri loves pulling flowers from garbage.

jayu70 · Post #10 » by **jayu70** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:41 pm

Hawks offer pick #51.

HornetJail · Post #11 » by **HornetJail** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:42 pm

I wouldn't be mad if we offered #32 and cap space for him. I wouldn't necessarily have him super high on the list of trade targets but I don't mind taking a flyer on him like that.

matt6715 · Post #12 » by **matt6715** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:48 pm

Malik Monk and #32 for Knox?

Bentley1225 · Post #13 » by **Bentley1225** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:52 pm

I like the Kings or the Warriors:

Kings offer: #42 + 2021 Kings or Grizzlies 2nd round pick (least favorable)
Warriors offer: #51 + 2021 Denver or Minnesota 2nd round pick (least favorable) + TPE

Village Idiot · Post #14 » by **Village Idiot** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:52 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:Even with Portland needing a long term fit at SF, I wouldn't move anything of note for him. I would rather see if Gary Trent Jr can shore up that spot and he is more of a SG. But, at least he has shown an efficient offensive trait, good 3PT shooting. Knox can score if given usage that he absolutely doesn't deserve.

While Ntilikina is the discard Knick I'd like to see on the Blazers I would be interested in taking a shot at Knox too. He's never going to be a star but he was actually pretty decent last season is a very different role than this season.

TPE, Simons, Hezonja and #14 for Ntilikina, Knox and the 27 would be my offer. It would have to be consummated after the draft due to the Blazers tax status.

Buzzard · Post #15 » by **Buzzard** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:57 pm

jayu70 wrote:Hawks offer pick #51.

That does sound reasonable and I think others will offer better seconds. Clearing the cap space is the key for the Knicks.

Post #16 » by **gswhoops** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:00 pm

Bentley1225 wrote:I like the Kings or the Warriors:

Kings offer: #42 + 2021 Kings or Grizzlies 2nd round pick (least favorable)
Warriors offer: #51 + 2021 Denver or Minnesota 2nd round pick (least favorable) + TPE

Warriors are a bad fit for Knox. We need ready depth, not projects and he needs to go to a team that can let him develop and play through mistakes.

jayu70 · Post #17 » by **jayu70** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:11 pm

Buzzard wrote:
jayu70 wrote:Hawks offer pick #51.

That does sound reasonable and I think others will offer better seconds. Clearing the cap space is the key for the Knicks.

True, we do have a plethora of future 2nds (2021 thru 2026) to add if needed as well.

Knickfan1982 · Post #18 » by **Knickfan1982** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:13 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:In not much of a surprise, sounds like he could be available.

Read on Twitter

I think the responses this post exemplifies why the Knicks should keep him. If he holds such little value around the league then we are better off holding onto him to see if he can turn things around.

HornetJail · Post #19 » by **HornetJail** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm

matt6715 wrote:Malik Monk and #32 for Knox?

absolutely not

Bentley1225 · Post #20 » by **Bentley1225** » Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:23 pm

gswhoops wrote:
Bentley1225 wrote:I like the Kings or the Warriors:

Kings offer: #42 + 2021 Kings or Grizzlies 2nd round pick (least favorable)
Warriors offer: #51 + 2021 Denver or Minnesota 2nd round pick (least favorable) + TPE

Warriors are a bad fit for Knox. We need ready depth, not projects and he needs to go to a team that can let him develop and play through mistakes.

I look at it as culturally, he could benefit given what they Warriors have built. I guess it highly depends on what they do at the draft but I ranked the Kings ahead of the Warriors in terms of best fit.