Eddy_JukeZ wrote:If it's talent, I think it's Harden.
Only if the talent show is dead fish impersonations...
Moderators: Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake
Eddy_JukeZ wrote:If it's talent, I think it's Harden.
Sane wrote:Wade can't hit a 3, a basic skill. He can't be in this convo.
gorz wrote:cp3 is the most skilled. For him to be a former top 5 player in the NBA and perennial top 10 at his height is incredible.
Harden is freaking skilled for 6'5. His combination of handle and shot is one of the best all time at his height range 6'4-6'6.
Wade is the most athletic of three but least skilled of the 3 even tho he's underrated in that department. He didn't have vast offensive arsenal but stuck to what he was good at.
OdomFan wrote:elchengue20 wrote:Suprasc1 wrote:If LeBron had CP3 in 2011 he would've won 4 in a row
I agree, but Wade wasnt in his prime anymore post 2010. Also, CP3 is a better fit next to Lebron than Wade.
How? What can CP3 possibly do in a system where the ball is dominated more times than not by Lebron James? CP3 is used to being the one running the offense, so it wouldn't make any sense to put those two on the same team.
karkinos wrote:Sane wrote:Wade can't hit a 3, a basic skill. He can't be in this convo.
read the topic?
this thread is about talent, not skill.
elchengue20 wrote:OdomFan wrote:elchengue20 wrote:
I agree, but Wade wasnt in his prime anymore post 2010. Also, CP3 is a better fit next to Lebron than Wade.
How? What can CP3 possibly do in a system where the ball is dominated more times than not by Lebron James? CP3 is used to being the one running the offense, so it wouldn't make any sense to put those two on the same team.
Chris Paul is a better off ball player than Wade. Wade was a combo guard more than a pure SG. And he was a terrible spot up shooter. He wasn't a great fit next to Lebron, they made it work because they were great. CP3 played well enough next to a more ball dominant player in Harden. Not saying CP3 is a ideal fit next to Lebron, but a better one than Wade. He would be like a smarter and way better defender version of Irving. He would also allow Lebron to play off ball better.
Plus, he was in his prime in the 2010's. Wade wasnt.
gorz wrote:cp3 is the most skilled. For him to be a former top 5 player in the NBA and perennial top 10 at his height is incredible.
Harden is freaking skilled for 6'5. His combination of handle and shot is one of the best all time at his height range 6'4-6'6.
Wade is the most athletic of three but least skilled of the 3 even tho he's underrated in that department. He didn't have vast offensive arsenal but stuck to what he was good at.
elchengue20 wrote:OdomFan wrote:elchengue20 wrote:
I agree, but Wade wasnt in his prime anymore post 2010. Also, CP3 is a better fit next to Lebron than Wade.
How? What can CP3 possibly do in a system where the ball is dominated more times than not by Lebron James? CP3 is used to being the one running the offense, so it wouldn't make any sense to put those two on the same team.
Chris Paul is a better off ball player than Wade. Wade was a combo guard more than a pure SG. And he was a terrible spot up shooter. He wasn't a great fit next to Lebron, they made it work because they were great. CP3 played well enough next to a more ball dominant player in Harden. Not saying CP3 is a ideal fit next to Lebron, but a better one than Wade. He would be like a smarter and way better defender version of Irving. He would also allow Lebron to play off ball better.
Plus, he was in his prime in the 2010's. Wade wasnt.
Sane wrote:karkinos wrote:Sane wrote:Wade can't hit a 3, a basic skill. He can't be in this convo.
read the topic?
this thread is about talent, not skill.
Correct, he doesn't have the talent to add that skill.
Doesn't happen with Harden and CP3.
BBallFreak wrote:Soulyss wrote:CP3 is so criminally underrated on this board. Probably because he's an ****. But criminally underrated nevertheless.
I fail to see how comparing him to Wade and Harden underrates him...
chyau.00 wrote:2 perennial losers vs a champion.
why is this even a debate?