NotACat wrote:MagicFan101 wrote:Knightro wrote:
Yeah I mean there's all kinds of noise and necessary context in small sample sizes. The Magic are 4-0 without Fournier, ya know?
Circling back to LaVine - what do you think is realistic?
Gordon for LaVine straight up?
Gordon + Aminu for LaVine and Satoransky?
Fournier + 16 for LaVine?
I mean, I would rather have Buddy Hield who is currently a backup for Sacramento but I’m also not complaining about either option at this point.
I offered to idea of AG + Evan + 16 for Lavine + Thad Young.
We get our scorer in Lavine and Chicago gets AG, a pick and saves a year of cap space in the Young for Evan swap.
I think there will be a number of teams lining up to get him (Knicks?) so we need to spend a bit.
That deal send like an extreme overpay for Orlando, and we have no use for Thad with Aminu on the roster. If we're sending both AG and Fournier, we shouldn't also send our pick and look to get some guard depth in return
And?
Gordon and Evan have not lead us anywhere.
Another mid-first rounder is unlikely to be what moves the needle far beyond the 1st round of the playoffs.
We desperately need a offensive spark plug. We are not currently a free agent destination and we are stuck in no mans land in the middle of recent drafts.
How are we going to acquire that needed player without cashing in on our good-not-great players and perhaps overpaying?
People on this board keep complaining when we don’t make a big trade but also complain when we possibly overpay. Now, I would prefer a Buddy Hield, CJ McCollum or Caris Lavert over Zach Lavine. So don’t confuse this with being attached to a specific trade scenario. But I do believe that we are going to have to pony up and over pay to get the deal we want. People are going to have to be okay with that.