MagicBagley18 wrote:Homerclease wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:
No your point is he can make an all star game and we sell high on him....he’s gotta be an all star first before we can trade him for a superstar. Basically saying he’s young- my point is it’s year 5 he just learned how to dribble in a straight line and chew gum
I don’t think making all star games has much bearing on anything so I don’t know why you keep bringing that up. The point I’m trying to make is that there is enough room for improvement in his game and he’s young enough to be dealt while still in his prime for what should be at the minimum a market rate deal. Heck, Zach LaVine was the centerpiece in a Jimmy Butler deal and he’s horrible. I don’t think locking Brown up hurts the Celtics flexibility at all. I think it improves it. Say we never signed Kemba, let Hayward and Brown walk and didn’t receive any compensation for any of them. Where does that leave us? Tatum + Smart and a bunch of cap space? Now you have to convince a star to sign here after letting two above average guys walk to play with Tatum who by this point, is approaching Anthony Davis levels of “why can’t you build a team around me”. Want to make a trade for a guy to play with Tatum? With what? Smart and a bunch of mid firsts? It’s not ideal, but we have to keep the cupboard stocked with something and attempt to keep our future franchise guy happy
I’ve been on record as saying I would have traded brown before it got to that point when everyone here was saying he’s untouchable. It’s funny about LaVine because If Zach LaVine was on the Celtics he would be overrated by the fans here just like brown is, Isaiah was etc.
the Hayward signing was a good move at its time- unfortunately injury and other moves like getting AD didn’t happen but he at the very least was a player on the come up and ascending, fit the scheme to a T and fit around ainge’s plan to get AD and was a pat on the back for stevens because they love each other.
Kemba was a signing by wyc to keep the fans engaged and happy. If your asking if we would have been better off (in terms of flexibility and maneuverability) building around a 21 yr old stud in tatum and having cap space and or picks instead of signing kemba? there’s a real argument
We also have to keep that 21 year old stud happy, or he’s going to force his way out of here like so many other stars have done to so many other teams. I wish it were as easy as to wipe the slate clean and just build a team from scratch around Tatum, they’ve done a pretty good job tbh