zaymon wrote:Skin wrote:zaymon wrote:Very nice, detailed write up. I think the moves are mostly lateral. Lineups you wrote lack shooting basketball iq and passing. It would be ugly me first basketball, much worse than we have now. Our ceiling also stays the same, if not lower. We still dont have a star and additionaly we dont have a center.
Sounds like you like our roster too much. So I can't really value this opinion. Lower ceiling? Zach is closer to being an actual star than anything else we have on our roster. Don't bring up Vuc. He's fool's gold. A Fultz-Lavine-Oubre-Isaac-Bamba starting lineup seems far from ugly me-first basketball. Surely it's better than Buddy Ball. Besides, coaching influences the system. What is unknown is how well could they gel and who could be the unknown breakout players. Any of them could be future breakout stars.
So you value only opinions of people who agree with you ? Seems like Earvin "Magic" Johnson aproach. I am not thrilled with our team, but i think trades you proposed make us significantly worse, without raising our ceiling. You trade for as you mentioned yourself "fools gold" players and expect to start winning ? I did comparison of Lavine vs Fournier. Lavine is better at drawing fouls, and isolation, Fournier is better at everything else. Most importantly Fournier is better at handling the ball and decision making.
Oubre is atrocious passer, with 6,6% assist percantage. He refuses to pass the ball, and cant make the right play by himself.
Rozier is another underwhelming passer with suspect decision making.
All players you suggested are bad defenders, bad to average passers, and low basketball iq guys. Ramsey is exactly the same type.
Not even one of the players above fit with Isaac who is a below average passer himself. I wont even start on Bamba.
If we want to go into Tmac direction, Levert seems like the only viable option. I propably wouldnt do it becouse it doesnt raise our ceiling, but next year we would be much better. I could talk myself into it, if we showcased him as a lead ball handler and then traded when Isaac is back.
I appreciate your effort, and every idea is worth considering, but i just dont like this one.
No, I respect a lot of different opinions... I challenge you to do the same thing and propose trades to other teams fans and come up with something that "raises our ceiling". Honestly, please do it.
Are Rozier, Lavine, and Oubre perfect? No. But I'm not giving up perfection to get them.
You seem to be evaluating players in a vacuum and judging them based off their old situation and old roles without giving any thought to how they would operate together in a new situation and new roles. Is your worry that there would be TOO MUCH iso ball? For a team that hasn't had a legit iso player in what seems like eternity, that thought almost brings me to tears of joy!
Bring in the talent... Let the PG and coach dictate how the ball flows.
































