25 pts vs. LAC today
PER
15.67 season
Or Tim Hardaway ? 21pts. vs LAC today
PER
14.51 season
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Jose7 wrote:just remember who Joel's agent was. And that agent is the Knicks president and he aint tied to any of these players on our roster including our personal favorite Money Mitch.
Im just saying.
knickstape4ever wrote:
this is what's wrong w/ the organization. alway trying to star-phuck. what star is coming here/even available? focus on what you have 1st and if the opportunity presents itself, and if the price is right go for it (but dont mortgage entire future for a semi-star who gets us no better than an 8 seed)
8516knicks wrote:Maybe we can trade for trey burke?![]()
![]()
![]()
25 pts vs. LAC today
PER
15.67 season
Or Tim Hardaway ? 21pts. vs LAC today
PER
14.51 season
We also have a ton of cap space which can be used in a trade to create a traded player exception for the other team. We can essentially trade our cap space as an asset so an over the cap team could sign a high priced freeagent.HarthorneWingo wrote:knickstape4ever wrote:
this is what's wrong w/ the organization. alway trying to star-phuck. what star is coming here/even available? focus on what you have 1st and if the opportunity presents itself, and if the price is right go for it (but dont mortgage entire future for a semi-star who gets us no better than an 8 seed)
How are we "well-positioned"? What Randle is the only player we pay any real money to and what team is going to want him? Maybe the FO is thinking about trading RJ and the pick?

Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor

knickstape4ever wrote:
this is what's wrong w/ the organization. alway trying to star-phuck. what star is coming here/even available? focus on what you have 1st and if the opportunity presents itself, and if the price is right go for it (but dont mortgage entire future for a semi-star who gets us no better than an 8 seed)

KnicksGadfly wrote:8516knicks wrote:Maybe we can trade for trey burke?![]()
![]()
![]()
25 pts vs. LAC today
PER
15.67 season
Or Tim Hardaway ? 21pts. vs LAC today
PER
14.51 season
You think a team of
Burke
RJ
THJ
Randle
Mitch
is going to get the job done against the Clippers? Or are there other factors in play?

dakomish23 wrote:7 ft PF with mediocre at best defense
Turned 23 this year
Will need to be given an extension after next season
14.7 PPG 6.3 RPG 1.5 APG 0.8 SPG 0.5 BPG
43% on 11.8 FGA
82% on 3.1 FTA
34% on 6.3 3PA
52% EFG 56% TS
Assuming this player is available, what are you willing to trade for him?


thebuzzardman wrote:dakomish23 wrote:7 ft PF with mediocre at best defense
Turned 23 this year
Will need to be given an extension after next season
14.7 PPG 6.3 RPG 1.5 APG 0.8 SPG 0.5 BPG
43% on 11.8 FGA
82% on 3.1 FTA
34% on 6.3 3PA
52% EFG 56% TS
Assuming this player is available, what are you willing to trade for him?
Sounds like Lauri.
Not sure.
He's provide some stretch 4 action, but I feel like there are cheaper options available that are better all around players.
I guess a team would have to feel strongly he's going to progress, which he very well could.
But he'll cost picks etc, and THEN be due his extension.
Why not sign someone like Jerami Grant? Better defender. Probably provides 3/5th's the offense at 1/4 the cost in assets and cap space
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor

Zerostatic wrote:Jose7 wrote:just remember who Joel's agent was. And that agent is the Knicks president and he aint tied to any of these players on our roster including our personal favorite Money Mitch.
Im just saying.
I'd be all over Joel Embid. He's 26 and was universally ranked as a top 15-20 player in the league. His stock could be low now due the 76ers getting spanked. The only issue is that I can not see Philly trading Embid without moving at least one of Horford and Harris. With those those 2 contracts they can not rebuild for years. The good thing about this is that having to take one of those deals would dramatically reduce the price you'd normally pay for a young all-star big man. If we were willing to take on Harris we could probably do the deal without giving up any draft picks especially because with our cap space we'd be giving them a traded player exception which they can then use to sign a player which could be looked at as very valuable for a team that is over the cap. We'd basically be trading cap space.
Would they do Embid & Harris for Randle, Knox and Cap Space? If we had to include Mitch or the Clippers pick, I'd still do it (I like Mitch but he is overrated on this board). Also, Harris is another young player whose stock is very low right now but it wasn't too long ago that many thought much higher of him.
Milk wrote:

If true, then we will probably be drafting a wing, which for means Deni, Okoro, or Vassell in that order for meMilk wrote:
bigfnjoe96 wrote:If true, then we will probably be drafting a wing, which for means Deni, Okoro, or Vassell in that order for meMilk wrote:
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
thebuzzardman wrote:Milk wrote:
Reporter looks up teams who need a PG and have cap space, writes tweet and article
