OrlandO wrote:MartinsIzAfraud wrote:UCFJayBird wrote:
You're conflating isolated incidents with patterns and trends. It's like when a man complains that the media and society ignores sexual harassment/assault/rape against men. Does it happen? Of course. Is it a problem? Yes. Is it as big of a problem as it is against women? No. And that's the difference.
(edited insert: And to be clear, yes those issues need to be addressed as well. But the urgency isn't as prevalent and there's a chance those issues are resolved by addressing the larger issue as well. But if not, fix the bigger problem first and then work on the smaller issue. /end edit).
Yes, violence happens against officers. Yes, officers kill white people too for BS reasons too. But not on the scale, and not for the same level of reasons against minorities, specifically black people. The response to a white man walking down the street armed with an AR-15 is entirely different than it is against a black man. People didn't wake up one day and see an isolated incident and go to the streets to the protest. It's been DECADES of this stuff happening and it hit a boiling point.
Also, regarding the "rapist black criminal" as you put it. Did the police know his record before shooting him? I fail to see how. And if not, it has no bearing on how people should react and respond to the officer's actions. Furthermore, even if they DID know, it still wouldn't justify them acting as an executioner and deciding to shoot him instead of continuing to try and de-escalate. The man was shot seven times, IN THE BACK.
What happened to the concept of police officers using their guns as a last resort? When their lives or those around them are in IMMEDIATE danger. Why are we so quick to now just write off any murder so long as the person, especially if it's an officer, just FELT threatened.
We need to bring back standards of expectations and hold people accountable to those standards. Being an officer is a tough job. It's a demanding job. It's a dangerous job. We demand WAY too much of police officers. But that doesn't mean we should bend over backwards to look past their inappropriate actions and mistakes, or let them open fire on any civilian that resists, or fights back (without endangering their lives). Cops are trained to deal with this stuff. And if they're not trained well enough, we should train them better. We need to change the priorities and how we look at these incidents.
People are not asking for that much. They're actually asking for pretty reasonable actions, and I happen to think that if we saw ANY kind of leadership from the federal government (Congress and/or the President) to actually address this instead of ignoring it and chalking i up to "the radical left" and "antifa" we'd actually see things quiet down pretty quickly. People more than anything just want to know that our leaders are TRYING. And right now, it looks like they're just ignoring the problem or using it for political ads (BOTH sides).
I'm not condoning what happened just laying out some facts.
Yes the police officers knew who he was and that was the main reason why they were going to the house. He wasn't there breaking up a fight like the media mentioned. The GF called the police and said he wasn't supposed to be there, when she asked him to leave he took her keys and walked out. Police were there to arrest him for his open warrant.
He was shot 7 times (shouldn't have happened) because he resisted arrest walked back to a car (was asked to stop multiple time) and opened the door and reached for something.
Cancel the NBA let the players and others go back and meet with the local government and start working on plans.
Lets see why it's second nature to resist arrest
Let's see what we can do to improve police training
Let's see how we can better the inner city communities and educate support and grow
Let's also stop acting as if there's just 1 problem.
Enough is Enough
It appears he was also armed with a knife after resisting arrest and being tasered. You can hear police order him to "drop the knife" as he was walking around his car and the person who recorded the video reportedly confirmed they heard it as well. Last night it was confirmed a knife was found on the driver's side floorboard.
I'm not sure what police are supposed to do in a situation like that... dude had a felony arrest warrant for sexual assault and domestic abuse that happened at that same address, he resisted arrest and taser, pulled a knife as he attempted to flee and access his car with children inside. Is a cop supposed to wrestle with him? Let him go?
Don't let him go, obviously. But let's say it was as dire as you say, the cop is afraid that he's either a) going to try and use a weapon from his car to fight back, or b) get in the car and flee with children in the car.
So first, the cop should see the weapon in question. If he sees the man pulling a gun out of his car, I could understand shooting him to prevent the man using the gun on himself, the children, the officers, or an innocent bystander. There's so many variables in that situation that it would be VERY understandable why the cop would fire. Especially given that they've tried to arrest him already, tased him, etc.
However, in this scenario, it's a knife. So once the cop sees the knife, a very short range weapon. he should continue to try and de-escalate the situation. Officers are trained to deal with hostile people with weapons. Again, try and get the man to put the weapon down. Do not fire unless he goes after someone with it. If he's just telling you to stay back and waving it in front of him, still. DO NOT SHOOT. If he comes after you, then it becomes understandable and reasonable to fire. He's threatening to stab you. You could try and work with your partner to wrestle it away from him and pin him to the ground. We've seen that before. But I'd at least understand in this scenario taking a more drastic measure.
However, Blake did not, as far as I know, actually brandish the weapon. They found it on the floor of his car afterwards, we're presuming he dropped it when he was shot in the back seven times.
And all this comes back to also firing SEVEN times in the man's BACK. Could they not have shot him once in the leg? A couple times in the legs? Why in the back? It's hard to argue that he was a threat to someone immediately when he wasn't facing anyone. Even if you shoot him in the back, seven times? Really? You needed seven shots to take the guy down?
Look. I get it. The man wasn't being cooperative. He may have had a knife. But it's mind boggling that we've gone from expecting our cops to use their guns as a last resort to arguing that it's ok for them to shoot a man seven times in the back because he has a knife and he's resisting.