Jcool0 wrote:So if Hayes becomes Russell 2.0 is that even a good outcome?
As a prospect, Russell was better than Hayes was in couple of aspects like ball handling. But I believe Hayes could have a better future than Russell.
Unlike Russell, Hayes is a better team defender AND is a willing defender. Also Hayes is good in transition and can finish. Hayes also has a better FT% than Russell did in college meaning that he could become a better shooter than Russell is. Albeit he had less free attempts than Russell did in college. But I believe in Hayes shot since he shoots so good on step back jumpers . 41.1 FG% / 52.1 aFG% (30/73) this year. While last year, he shot 31.4 FG% / 33.3% aFG% (16-51) in shots off the dribble
In a ideal scenario, I see Hayes becoming a better shooter version of Russell that is an able and willing defender(not all team-defense caliber obviously but one where he isn't a negative on that end like Russell is) . On a higher end scenario, he could become a Harden caliber player. But that is only if he keeps improving at his current rate and has the mentality to become great.(He seems to have a good head on his shoulder based on the interviews that I saw.)
I am really high on Hayes because of the improvements he made each year while he was in the pros. He is only 19 years old too. My only concerns is his athleticism but since he is a good player in transition; it's hard to imagine than his athleticism would not be able to work in the NBA.
Also, I feel that the left hand only critique is overblown since most lefties have that issue but I have NEVER seen a player bust because they can only use their left hand. Most of his negatives can easily be worked upon and the sky is the limit for this kid.
