Trade Thread (TRADE WARS EPISODE V: The Empire Strikes Back)

Scoots1994 · Post #1581 » by **Scoots1994** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:44 pm

hummbabybear wrote:How would you allocate draft picks if these were the players traded? Could the Warriors still keep #2 with this trade scenario?

Knicks get
Kevon Looney
Furkan Korkman
Ky Bowman

Warriors get
Al Horford
Frank Ntilikina

76ers get
Andrew Wiggins
Mitchell Robinson

I would hope the Warriors put no picks in to that trade and get some picks back.

mos_def · Post #1582 » by **mos_def** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 5:02 pm

hummbabybear wrote:How would you allocate draft picks if these were the players traded? Could the Warriors still keep #2 with this trade scenario?

Knicks get
Kevon Looney
Furkan Korkman
Ky Bowman

Warriors get
Al Horford
Frank Ntilikina

76ers get
Andrew Wiggins
Mitchell Robinson

Uhm...Im surprised Kwame Brown wasnt thrown in this trade

GQ Hot Dog · Post #1583 » by **GQ Hot Dog** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:06 pm

hummbabybear wrote:How would you allocate draft picks if these were the players traded? Could the Warriors still keep #2 with this trade scenario?

Knicks get
Kevon Looney
Furkan Korkman
Ky Bowman

Warriors get
Al Horford
Frank Ntilikina

76ers get
Andrew Wiggins
Mitchell Robinson

If the Knicks like this, cut out the Sixers and we'll give them a couple 2nd round picks for MitchRob. If we want a young, long and athletic rim runner/shot blocker I'd rather have him than Wiseman. And we would get to keep Wiggins who is clearly the best player in this deal.

xdrta+ · Post #1584 » by **xdrta+** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:23 pm

GQ Hot Dog wrote:
hummbabybear wrote:How would you allocate draft picks if these were the players traded? Could the Warriors still keep #2 with this trade scenario?

Knicks get
Kevon Looney
Furkan Korkman
Ky Bowman

Warriors get
Al Horford
Frank Ntilikina

76ers get
Andrew Wiggins
Mitchell Robinson

If the Knicks like this, cut out the Sixers and we'll give them a couple 2nd round picks for MitchRob. If we want a young, long and athletic rim runner/shot blocker I'd rather have him than Wiseman. And we would get to keep Wiggins who is clearly the best player in this deal.

I hope they would want no part of old man Horford.

DAWill1128 · Post #1585 » by **DAWill1128** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 7:50 pm

Watch on YouTube

Commodor · Post #1586 » by **Commodor** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 9:29 pm

hummbabybear wrote:How would you allocate draft picks if these were the players traded? Could the Warriors still keep #2 with this trade scenario?

Knicks get
Kevon Looney
Furkan Korkman
Ky Bowman

Warriors get
Al Horford
Frank Ntilikina

76ers get
Andrew Wiggins
Mitchell Robinson

Start by removing Wiggins, bowman and Looney.

Then you take the GSW picks and keep them as far away from this type of trade as possible.

Commodor · Post #1587 » by **Commodor** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 9:33 pm

DAWill1128 wrote:

Watch on YouTube

It’s weird. The philly trades start interesting and then it’s pretty much a deluge of absolutely awful to completely unrealistic.

Lol lonzo+13 for #2? Now that’s funny.

The Maestro · Post #1588 » by **The Maestro** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 9:41 pm

Wiggins,2 for Warren/Turner is interesting. They could then target Richardson from Phily with the TPE. Could go after vets like MCW, GR3, Bazemore and Augustine to fill out the roster

Curry/Augustine/Poole
Klay/Bazemore/Lee
Warren/Richardson
Dray/Paschall
Turner/Chriss/Looney

DAWill1128 · Post #1589 » by **DAWill1128** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:03 pm

Commodor wrote:
DAWill1128 wrote:

Watch on YouTube

It’s weird. The philly trades start interesting and then it’s pretty much a deluge of absolutely awful to completely unrealistic.

Lol lonzo+13 for #2? Now that’s funny.

The Philly guys are just a bit flawed to get over the hump imo.

I don't dislike Lonzo as a player but I also think mentally he will have zero interest off the bench. It would be a really disappointing off season.

DAWill1128 · Post #1590 » by **DAWill1128** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:12 pm

The Maestro wrote:Wiggins,2 for Warren/Turner is interesting. They could then target Richardson from Phily with the TPE. Could go after vets like MCW, GR3, Bazemore and Augustine to fill out the roster

Curry/Augustine/Poole
Klay/Bazemore/Lee
Warren/Richardson
Dray/Paschall
Turner/Chriss/Looney

The Pacers trade is definitely a win now trade in exchange for the future. I think we would win the West with the Pacers trade, I don't think the Lakers have the level of talent we would have. The Clippers have a lot of free agents and I think they will lose key guys after this season.

I think I would be in the minority to say that I like the idea of Bogdanovic. Teams don't really lock down till the playoffs and I could see a team with Steph, Klay, Wiggins, and Bogdanovic destroying teams from deep and coasting to the top seed. Now could we play good defense? Idk. If Roberson committed to come on board as the other backup wing and we got a decent center I would be okay with it.

whatisacenter · Post #1591 » by **whatisacenter** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:39 pm

DAWill1128 wrote:
The Maestro wrote:Wiggins,2 for Warren/Turner is interesting. They could then target Richardson from Phily with the TPE. Could go after vets like MCW, GR3, Bazemore and Augustine to fill out the roster

Curry/Augustine/Poole
Klay/Bazemore/Lee
Warren/Richardson
Dray/Paschall
Turner/Chriss/Looney

The Pacers trade is definitely a win now trade in exchange for the future. I think we would win the West with the Pacers trade, I don't think the Lakers have the level of talent we would have. The Clippers have a lot of free agents and I think they will lose key guys after this season.

I think I would be in the minority to say that I like the idea of Bogdanovic. Teams don't really lock down till the playoffs and I could see a team with Steph, Klay, Wiggins, and Bogdanovic destroying teams from deep and coasting to the top seed. Now could we play good defense? Idk. If Roberson committed to come on board as the other backup wing and we got a decent center I would be okay with it.

I liked the pacer trade the best as well out of the scenarios he went through. I don't think the sixers are going to trade either of their big 2. Bogdanovic would require a sign and trade and that ain't happening as it would hard cap the team again.

The Maestro · Post #1592 » by **The Maestro** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 11:06 pm

We make that Pacers trade and get a few of those vets on the minimum and we will go to the Finals imo.

The Maestro · Post #1593 » by **The Maestro** » Sat Aug 29, 2020 11:13 pm

whatisacenter wrote:The Pacers trade is definitely a win now trade in exchange for the future.

But the future will still be fine because we’re gonna have a top 5-8 pick in next years draft and that guy will be the next star to carry us past the Curry/Klay/Dray. That draft is loaded.

watch1958 · Post #1594 » by **watch1958** » Sun Aug 30, 2020 12:31 am

ShayDee wrote:
watch1958 wrote:About I week ago on the trade board, I saw a proposal for #2 & Paschall & Looney & TPE to ATL for #6 and Clint Capela. Thoughts?

He doesn't fit in the TPE. He is making 17.5, TPE is 17.2

Works on the trade checker.

ILOVEIT · Post #1595 » by **ILOVEIT** » Sun Aug 30, 2020 2:07 am

DAWill1128 wrote:
The Maestro wrote:Wiggins,2 for Warren/Turner is interesting. They could then target Richardson from Phily with the TPE. Could go after vets like MCW, GR3, Bazemore and Augustine to fill out the roster

Curry/Augustine/Poole
Klay/Bazemore/Lee
Warren/Richardson
Dray/Paschall
Turner/Chriss/Looney

The Pacers trade is definitely a win now trade in exchange for the future. I think we would win the West with the Pacers trade, I don't think the Lakers have the level of talent we would have. The Clippers have a lot of free agents and I think they will lose key guys after this season.

I think I would be in the minority to say that I like the idea of Bogdanovic. Teams don't really lock down till the playoffs and I could see a team with Steph, Klay, Wiggins, and Bogdanovic destroying teams from deep and coasting to the top seed. Now could we play good defense? Idk. If Roberson committed to come on board as the other backup wing and we got a decent center I would be okay with it.

These feels like the best "brick and mortar" trade so far. Wins now.

xdrta+ · Post #1596 » by **xdrta+** » Sun Aug 30, 2020 2:07 am

watch1958 wrote:
ShayDee wrote:
watch1958 wrote:About I week ago on the trade board, I saw a proposal for #2 & Paschall & Looney & TPE to ATL for #6 and Clint Capela. Thoughts?

He doesn't fit in the TPE. He is making 17.5, TPE is 17.2
Works on the trade checker.

I've noticed before, the trade checker doesn't always get the details right.

Mylie10 · Post #1597 » by **Mylie10** » Sun Aug 30, 2020 2:09 am

watch1958 wrote:
ShayDee wrote:
watch1958 wrote:About I week ago on the trade board, I saw a proposal for #2 & Paschall & Looney & TPE to ATL for #6 and Clint Capela. Thoughts?

He doesn't fit in the TPE. He is making 17.5, TPE is 17.2
Works on the trade checker.

I would simplify the trade based on the idea that if the Hawks have a target they want to get to at 2, then we shouldn’t have to add Paschall and Looney.

And if the Hawks are being adversely affected by COVID and the loss in revenue, then they may be happy to have us take Capellas salary.

So I’d go;

#2 and the TPE for #6 and Capella

At six my targets would be Okoro, Vassell, P Will, Deni, Okungwu, Haliburton, etc.

Not a huge fan of Capella, I’ll be honest.

xdrta+ · Post #1598 » by **xdrta+** » Sun Aug 30, 2020 2:14 am

Mylie10 wrote:
watch1958 wrote:
ShayDee wrote:
He doesn't fit in the TPE. He is making 17.5, TPE is 17.2
Works on the trade checker.

I would simplify the trade based on the idea that if the Hawks have a target they want to get to at 2, then we shouldn’t have to add Paschall and Looney.

And if the Hawks are being adversely affected by COVID and the loss in revenue, then they may be happy to have us take Capellas salary.

So I’d go;

#2 and the TPE for #6 and Capella

At six my targets would be Okoro, Vassell, P Will, Deni, Okungwu, Haliburton, etc.

Not a huge fan of Capella, I’ll be honest.

As ShayDee noted above, Capella's salary is too much for the trade exception.

statsman · Post #1599 » by **statsman** » Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:11 am

ShayDee wrote:
watch1958 wrote:About I week ago on the trade board, I saw a proposal for #2 & Paschall & Looney & TPE to ATL for #6 and Clint Capela. Thoughts?

He doesn't fit in the TPE. He is making 17.5, TPE is 17.2

Where do you get that Capela is making $17.5M?

The Maestro · Post #1600 » by **The Maestro** » Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:21 am

Mylie10 wrote:
watch1958 wrote:
ShayDee wrote:
He doesn't fit in the TPE. He is making 17.5, TPE is 17.2
Works on the trade checker.

I would simplify the trade based on the idea that if the Hawks have a target they want to get to at 2, then we shouldn’t have to add Paschall and Looney.

And if the Hawks are being adversely affected by COVID and the loss in revenue, then they may be happy to have us take Capellas salary.

So I’d go;

#2 and the TPE for #6 and Capella

At six my targets would be Okoro, Vassell, P Will, Deni, Okungwu, Haliburton, etc.

Not a huge fan of Capella, I’ll be honest.

No thanks to Capella but #2 for Collins or Hunter or Huerter and #6 makes sense. Then draft Haliburton, Vassell or Williams. Or maybe even Okongwu if we get one of the Atl perimeter players.