Trade Talk (Part Four)
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,754
- And1: 23,084
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
I'd have to look at Markkanen again, but I don't remember him being as good on-ball as say Avdija.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
- youngthegiant
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,773
- And1: 5,706
- Joined: Aug 31, 2011
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
Monte Morris for Josh Okogie? You get a solid pg who could potentially play alongside Russell and we get some defense.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,613
- And1: 6,473
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
youngthegiant wrote:Monte Morris for Josh Okogie? You get a solid pg who could potentially play alongside Russell and we get some defense.
It's a fair trade IMO, but we don't have a true SF on the team IMO and Okogie is the closest we got to an SF. We can't afford to send him out.
I'm hoping we resign J Mac and that would pretty much eliminate any need for a PG.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,754
- And1: 23,084
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
A lot of people have discussed trade down possibilities with Charlotte. Most of the discussion has centered around PJ Washington. I brought up Miles Bridges the other day. But what about Malik Monk? There are a few things that hold me back from going all-in on him, but I think the tools are intriguing.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,618
- And1: 19,716
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
youngthegiant wrote:Monte Morris for Josh Okogie? You get a solid pg who could potentially play alongside Russell and we get some defense.
I don’t think it’s unfair either, but adding another PG is not a priority here - wing defense is.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
Wolveswin
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,424
- And1: 3,139
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
I am like many here and think Simmons is target #1.
Some have said he doesn't work with Russell -- who also needs the ball in hand. I think a little differently, they actually compliment each other perfectly and need each other to take their respective next step in their NBA journey.
Russell is a dribble-driver. More of a scoring SG than an offense initiator. Simmons needs the ball in his hands in transition -- but not in the half court. Boom, peas and carrots. Peanut butter and jelly.
Simmons would become the offense initiator from one of the forward positions, with the ball in his hand during transition moments. During half court sets, Russell will have ball in hand, and Simmons can go down low. Simmons should have space to work with Towns spotting up for 8-10 3PT attempts per game and the other F being a spot up shooter (corner 3 becomes important). Simmons would have a guard (Russell) to take over the 'guard' duties so he can get closer to the rim where he is actually a threat to score -- and his man can't slack off to play help D.
Towns
Hernangomez
Simmons
Beasley
Russell
That is a lethal lineup. Simmons can D-up any forward or big who is not 'traditional center' in which Towns needs that matchup. If Beasley and Russell can play passible D on guards, team will survive on defense. But, I would think Okogie would play a big role. He would be quick off the bench as 6th man to play role of shut down defensive guard. Okogie would become a defensive juggernaut on opposing team's lead guard -- allowing Saunders to stagger the scoring of Beasley with other (non starting) units.
Some have said he doesn't work with Russell -- who also needs the ball in hand. I think a little differently, they actually compliment each other perfectly and need each other to take their respective next step in their NBA journey.
Russell is a dribble-driver. More of a scoring SG than an offense initiator. Simmons needs the ball in his hands in transition -- but not in the half court. Boom, peas and carrots. Peanut butter and jelly.
Simmons would become the offense initiator from one of the forward positions, with the ball in his hand during transition moments. During half court sets, Russell will have ball in hand, and Simmons can go down low. Simmons should have space to work with Towns spotting up for 8-10 3PT attempts per game and the other F being a spot up shooter (corner 3 becomes important). Simmons would have a guard (Russell) to take over the 'guard' duties so he can get closer to the rim where he is actually a threat to score -- and his man can't slack off to play help D.
Towns
Hernangomez
Simmons
Beasley
Russell
That is a lethal lineup. Simmons can D-up any forward or big who is not 'traditional center' in which Towns needs that matchup. If Beasley and Russell can play passible D on guards, team will survive on defense. But, I would think Okogie would play a big role. He would be quick off the bench as 6th man to play role of shut down defensive guard. Okogie would become a defensive juggernaut on opposing team's lead guard -- allowing Saunders to stagger the scoring of Beasley with other (non starting) units.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,613
- And1: 6,473
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
Klomp wrote:A lot of people have discussed trade down possibilities with Charlotte. Most of the discussion has centered around PJ Washington. I brought up Miles Bridges the other day. But what about Malik Monk? There are a few things that hold me back from going all-in on him, but I think the tools are intriguing.
No interest in Miles Bridges or Monk. If we make that trade our options will be Ball, Okongwu or Avdija. I see Bridges and Monk both as just taking up a roster spot. No plus to them at all IMO. If we did make that deal I would hope for Okongwu or Avdija, but I fear with might take Ball. On the other hand we make that deal and then trade 3 for some good asset and Still get Okongwu that would be OK with me. If we make that deal we better be getting a 21 FRP included.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,613
- And1: 6,473
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
Wolveswin wrote:I am like many here and think Simmons is target #1.
Some have said he doesn't work with Russell -- who also needs the ball in hand. I think a little differently, they actually compliment each other perfectly and need each other to take their respective next step in their NBA journey.
Russell is a dribble-driver. More of a scoring SG than an offense initiator. Simmons needs the ball in his hands in transition -- but not in the half court. Boom, peas and carrots. Peanut butter and jelly.
Simmons would become the offense initiator from one of the forward positions, with the ball in his hand during transition moments. During half court sets, Russell will have ball in hand, and Simmons can go down low. Simmons should have space to work with Towns spotting up for 8-10 3PT attempts per game and the other F being a spot up shooter (corner 3 becomes important). Simmons would have a guard (Russell) to take over the 'guard' duties so he can get closer to the rim where he is actually a threat to score -- and his man can't slack off to play help D.
Towns
Hernangomez
Simmons
Beasley
Russell
That is a lethal lineup. Simmons can D-up any forward or big who is not 'traditional center' in which Towns needs that matchup. If Beasley and Russell can play passible D on guards, team will survive on defense. But, I would think Okogie would play a big role. He would be quick off the bench as 6th man to play role of shut down defensive guard. Okogie would become a defensive juggernaut on opposing team's lead guard -- allowing Saunders to stagger the scoring of Beasley with other (non starting) units.
I have no issues with Simmons, but Russell is not by any means a dribble-driver. He doesn't attack the rim at all.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
Wolveswin
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,424
- And1: 3,139
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
A Simmons trade I think makes a lot of sense...
Pelicans Give: Holiday + Redick + Hart + #13
Pelicans Get: #1 Overall (Ball or Edwards) + Culver + Horford + J. Johnson + #17
Pelicans Reasoning: set their future backcourt with #1 overall in back to back years.
Horford (mentors Hayes)
Zion
Ingram
Melo or Edwards
Zo
Plus Culver and Alexander-Walker and #17.
76ers Give: Simmons + Horford + Scott
76ers Get: Holiday + Redick + Hart + #13 + Future Wolves Draft Consideration
76ers Reasoning: trade not only saves them like 20MM instantly, gives them a great win-now reunion of Holiday and Redick. Holiday should re-sign for much more reasonable contract than Horford, and Redick re-signs for exception level contract.
Embiid
Harris
Richardson
Thybulle or Hart or Redick
Holiday
Plus #13, #21, #34, #36
Wolves Give: #1 Overall + J. Johnson + Culver + #17 + Future Draft Consideration
Wolves Get: Simmons + Scott
Wolves Reasoning: Saunders and Rosas have to think Simmons is the final piece to roster.
Towns
Herangomez
Simmons
Beasley
Russell
Pelicans Give: Holiday + Redick + Hart + #13
Pelicans Get: #1 Overall (Ball or Edwards) + Culver + Horford + J. Johnson + #17
Pelicans Reasoning: set their future backcourt with #1 overall in back to back years.
Horford (mentors Hayes)
Zion
Ingram
Melo or Edwards
Zo
Plus Culver and Alexander-Walker and #17.
76ers Give: Simmons + Horford + Scott
76ers Get: Holiday + Redick + Hart + #13 + Future Wolves Draft Consideration
76ers Reasoning: trade not only saves them like 20MM instantly, gives them a great win-now reunion of Holiday and Redick. Holiday should re-sign for much more reasonable contract than Horford, and Redick re-signs for exception level contract.
Embiid
Harris
Richardson
Thybulle or Hart or Redick
Holiday
Plus #13, #21, #34, #36
Wolves Give: #1 Overall + J. Johnson + Culver + #17 + Future Draft Consideration
Wolves Get: Simmons + Scott
Wolves Reasoning: Saunders and Rosas have to think Simmons is the final piece to roster.
Towns
Herangomez
Simmons
Beasley
Russell
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
Wolveswin
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,424
- And1: 3,139
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
KGdaBom wrote:Wolveswin wrote:I am like many here and think Simmons is target #1.
Some have said he doesn't work with Russell -- who also needs the ball in hand. I think a little differently, they actually compliment each other perfectly and need each other to take their respective next step in their NBA journey.
Russell is a dribble-driver. More of a scoring SG than an offense initiator. Simmons needs the ball in his hands in transition -- but not in the half court. Boom, peas and carrots. Peanut butter and jelly.
Simmons would become the offense initiator from one of the forward positions, with the ball in his hand during transition moments. During half court sets, Russell will have ball in hand, and Simmons can go down low. Simmons should have space to work with Towns spotting up for 8-10 3PT attempts per game and the other F being a spot up shooter (corner 3 becomes important). Simmons would have a guard (Russell) to take over the 'guard' duties so he can get closer to the rim where he is actually a threat to score -- and his man can't slack off to play help D.
Towns
Hernangomez
Simmons
Beasley
Russell
That is a lethal lineup. Simmons can D-up any forward or big who is not 'traditional center' in which Towns needs that matchup. If Beasley and Russell can play passible D on guards, team will survive on defense. But, I would think Okogie would play a big role. He would be quick off the bench as 6th man to play role of shut down defensive guard. Okogie would become a defensive juggernaut on opposing team's lead guard -- allowing Saunders to stagger the scoring of Beasley with other (non starting) units.
I have no issues with Simmons, but Russell is not by any means a dribble-driver. He doesn't attack the rim at all.
Let me clarify, he is a scorer off the dribble. He had 57% of his shots off the dribble and 22% catch and shoot. He uses the dribble to create (31% of shots came with 3-6 dribbles and 27% with 7+ dribbles). To me a dribble-driver doesn't mean it has to be all the way to rim -- but that could be one of the results from the dribbling.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,613
- And1: 6,473
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
Wolveswin wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Wolveswin wrote:I am like many here and think Simmons is target #1.
Some have said he doesn't work with Russell -- who also needs the ball in hand. I think a little differently, they actually compliment each other perfectly and need each other to take their respective next step in their NBA journey.
Russell is a dribble-driver. More of a scoring SG than an offense initiator. Simmons needs the ball in his hands in transition -- but not in the half court. Boom, peas and carrots. Peanut butter and jelly.
Simmons would become the offense initiator from one of the forward positions, with the ball in his hand during transition moments. During half court sets, Russell will have ball in hand, and Simmons can go down low. Simmons should have space to work with Towns spotting up for 8-10 3PT attempts per game and the other F being a spot up shooter (corner 3 becomes important). Simmons would have a guard (Russell) to take over the 'guard' duties so he can get closer to the rim where he is actually a threat to score -- and his man can't slack off to play help D.
Towns
Hernangomez
Simmons
Beasley
Russell
That is a lethal lineup. Simmons can D-up any forward or big who is not 'traditional center' in which Towns needs that matchup. If Beasley and Russell can play passible D on guards, team will survive on defense. But, I would think Okogie would play a big role. He would be quick off the bench as 6th man to play role of shut down defensive guard. Okogie would become a defensive juggernaut on opposing team's lead guard -- allowing Saunders to stagger the scoring of Beasley with other (non starting) units.
I have no issues with Simmons, but Russell is not by any means a dribble-driver. He doesn't attack the rim at all.
Let me clarify, he is a scorer off the dribble. He had 57% of his shots off the dribble and 22% catch and shoot. He uses the dribble to create (31% of shots came with 3-6 dribbles and 27% with 7+ dribbles). To me a dribble-driver doesn't mean it has to be all the way to rim -- but that could be one of the results from the dribbling.
Not exactly, but close enough.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
minimus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,810
- And1: 5,298
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
Would you like to test our luck again?
Trade with SAC:
Out: #1, #33, Spellman, Evans
In: #12, unprotected 2021 FRP, Richaun Holmes
Why for SAC: get Wiseman.
Why for MIN: next SAC will have to battle against LAL, LAC, GSW, PHO in division. So I would risk and trade our FRP for their next year FRP, 2021 draft looks better than 2020 draft.
Trade with ORL:
Out: #17, JJ
In: Aaron Gordon
Trade with NYK:
Out: #12, Nowell, Juancho
In: #8
Draft PG (Hayes, Maxey, Haliburton). Re-sign Beasley, Jmac, Kelan Martin (1+3).
KAT/Holmes/Reid
Gordon/Layman/Vanderbilt
Culver/Martin/Layman
Beasley/Okogie/DLo
DLo/Maxey/JMac
Trade with SAC:
Out: #1, #33, Spellman, Evans
In: #12, unprotected 2021 FRP, Richaun Holmes
Why for SAC: get Wiseman.
Why for MIN: next SAC will have to battle against LAL, LAC, GSW, PHO in division. So I would risk and trade our FRP for their next year FRP, 2021 draft looks better than 2020 draft.
Trade with ORL:
Out: #17, JJ
In: Aaron Gordon
Trade with NYK:
Out: #12, Nowell, Juancho
In: #8
Draft PG (Hayes, Maxey, Haliburton). Re-sign Beasley, Jmac, Kelan Martin (1+3).
KAT/Holmes/Reid
Gordon/Layman/Vanderbilt
Culver/Martin/Layman
Beasley/Okogie/DLo
DLo/Maxey/JMac
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
IceManBK1
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,232
- And1: 330
- Joined: Jul 14, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
Ben Simmons played with Dlo in HS and won state championships together. They should have good chemistry. I think having another person who can bring the ball up court and initiate the offense will ease the burden off dlo a bit. Simmons is very good pick and roll finisher. Great at drive and kick and finding open shooters. Dlo will get a lot of spot up opportunities. And if Dlo cuts to the basket Simmons will find him easily.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,613
- And1: 6,473
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
IceManBK1 wrote:Ben Simmons played with Dlo in HS and won state championships together. They should have good chemistry. I think having another person who can bring the ball up court and initiate the offense will ease the burden off dlo a bit. Simmons is very good pick and roll finisher. Great at drive and kick and finding open shooters. Dlo will get a lot of spot up opportunities. And if Dlo cuts to the basket Simmons will find him easily.
HS teammates. I had no Idea. Thanks for the tip.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,613
- And1: 6,473
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
minimus wrote:Would you like to test our luck again?
Trade with SAC:
Out: #1, #33, Spellman, Evans
In: #12, unprotected 2021 FRP, Richaun Holmes
Why for SAC: get Wiseman.
Why for MIN: next SAC will have to battle against LAL, LAC, GSW, PHO in division. So I would risk and trade our FRP for their next year FRP, 2021 draft looks better than 2020 draft.
Trade with ORL:
Out: #17, JJ
In: Aaron Gordon
Trade with NYK:
Out: #12, Nowell, Juancho
In: #8
Draft PG (Hayes, Maxey, Haliburton). Re-sign Beasley, Jmac, Kelan Martin (1+3).
KAT/Holmes/Reid
Gordon/Layman/Vanderbilt
Culver/Martin/Layman
Beasley/Okogie/DLo
DLo/Maxey/JMac
Hate it.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
Klomp
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 69,754
- And1: 23,084
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
KGdaBom wrote:IceManBK1 wrote:Ben Simmons played with Dlo in HS and won state championships together. They should have good chemistry. I think having another person who can bring the ball up court and initiate the offense will ease the burden off dlo a bit. Simmons is very good pick and roll finisher. Great at drive and kick and finding open shooters. Dlo will get a lot of spot up opportunities. And if Dlo cuts to the basket Simmons will find him easily.
HS teammates. I had no Idea. Thanks for the tip.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
jayu70
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,730
- And1: 13,152
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
KGdaBom wrote:gandlogo wrote:KGdaBom wrote:Reddish is bigger than Culver and a natural SF. He started last season poorly, but really came on strong down the stretch. My interest in him would be pretty high. Plus I love OO7. And Gordon for nothing but 17 and a salary swap. Sign me up.
Reddish is a SG, not a natural SF. He may be taller than Culver, but he’s not as physical. I tracked him as a Duke recruit in the AAU circuit. Watched him a ton at Duke. He’s a very talented kid. Great shooting stroke that was inconsistent in college, but finally started to see results late in the NBA season. He’s better suited at SG. In the MN 1-3-1 system, he’s just another wing like Beasley and Juancho. But if you need him to put a body on somebody, Culver or Okogie are better options at SF - despite their weaknesses on offense.
Wow so Reddish sucks at SF. Consider me no longer interested in acquiring him.
Ha. So KG, You came to the Hawks board trying to tell us we had too many SFs and disregarded what we told you regarding Huerter being strictly a SG, Reddish being a SG that can fill in at SF, but more of a natural SG and Hunter being the only truly SF than can play PF. Do you believe it now?
Don't mind Ken,
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,613
- And1: 6,473
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
jayu70 wrote:KGdaBom wrote:gandlogo wrote:
Reddish is a SG, not a natural SF. He may be taller than Culver, but he’s not as physical. I tracked him as a Duke recruit in the AAU circuit. Watched him a ton at Duke. He’s a very talented kid. Great shooting stroke that was inconsistent in college, but finally started to see results late in the NBA season. He’s better suited at SG. In the MN 1-3-1 system, he’s just another wing like Beasley and Juancho. But if you need him to put a body on somebody, Culver or Okogie are better options at SF - despite their weaknesses on offense.
Wow so Reddish sucks at SF. Consider me no longer interested in acquiring him.
Ha. So KG, You came to the Hawks board trying to tell us we had too many SFs and disregarded what we told you regarding Huerter being strictly a SG, Reddish being a SG that can fill in at SF, but more of a natural SG and Hunter being the only truly SF than can play PF. Do you believe it now?
Don't mind Ken,- come back anytime.
I'm convinced.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
King Ken
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,828
- And1: 5,506
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
Courtesy of KGdaBom,
I think the PERFECT trade would be John Collins for KAT.
Why?
1. JC is the perfect fit for LaMelo Ball. Best movement big in the NBA with one of the best passers makes so much sense. No brainer.
2. KAT never won anything in MIN without Jimmy Butler. Best to let him, Reddish, Hunter, and Trae Young do their thing.
3. You save nearly 25 million off the cap and can go to land AD to play with Collins and Ball.
Honestly, if you don't like it, your a hater, haters gonna hate. Ain't that right, KGdaBom?
I think the PERFECT trade would be John Collins for KAT.
Why?
1. JC is the perfect fit for LaMelo Ball. Best movement big in the NBA with one of the best passers makes so much sense. No brainer.
2. KAT never won anything in MIN without Jimmy Butler. Best to let him, Reddish, Hunter, and Trae Young do their thing.
3. You save nearly 25 million off the cap and can go to land AD to play with Collins and Ball.
Honestly, if you don't like it, your a hater, haters gonna hate. Ain't that right, KGdaBom?
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
-
mthead2121
- Sophomore
- Posts: 184
- And1: 63
- Joined: Dec 24, 2013
Re: Trade Talk (Part Four)
What y’all think of 17, Culver and Johnson for Oladipo?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves



