Pointgod wrote:Stannis wrote:Pointgod wrote:
Why do you think New Hampshire and Nevada are in play? This is the first that I’m hearing of this. You’re right Florida is the key to this whole thing. If Biden wins Florida and Pennsylvania, then Trump has to defend Wisconsin, Michigan, North Carolina, Arizona. And this is with me giving back Minnesota.
Frankly Biden needs to double down in Florida with the message that Trump will take away social security and healthcare. Simple straight forward message (that happens to be true). I’d feel confident about his chances with states that have Democratic Governors. The discussion needs to focus on the economy, covid, healthcare
Those were really close elections in 2016.
Just makes too much sense for the Trump administration to go in on those states since he has to run a more strategic campaign.
New Hampshire is mostly white with decent amount rural areas. Don't be fooled. There such a thing as shy Trump voters. Rain or shine, covid or no covid, they will all vote in person.
And do you not believe that there’s a shy Biden voter or a silent majority of Biden voters? Look at the polling of the military? If I’m not mistaken the military skews Republican right? I don’t know why people would lie to pollsters. People take the wrong lesson from 2016. It’s not who voted for Trump, it’s who chose to stay at home or vote 3rd Party. My other post about third party polling shows the clear margins in the key states. Something like 1 million voters left the top of the ballot blank or wrote in candidates and 5 million people who voted for Obama in 2012 stayed home in 2016. I know for a fact Democrats have been registering and turning out voters over the past 4 years. I haven’t seen a similar plan to grow the base from the Trump campaign. Also what the polls don’t capture are first time voters or disaffected voters coming back to the Democratic Party.
There were a few million undecided voters going into the final weeks of the 2016 election. Comey pushed most of them off the fence towards Trump.
The point of that is there is no such grey area in 2020. You already know what you think of Trump. So both Biden and Trump are KNOWN factors to choose from.
However, Trump represented a blank slate for a fair amount of people who very much had a disgust with politics and figured what have you got to lose voting for a political outsider. Not everyone who voted for Trump fully comprehended the depth of his bigotry in 2016. They know now what he stands for and that means not everyone who voted for Trump in 2016 likes what they signed up for.
Additionally, there is little reason to think anyone who voted for Clinton in 2016 now wishes they had voted for Trump.
IOW, there is far less elasticity in voter opinion that can suddenly favor Trump close to election day.
Trump's internal pollsters know this, hence the extremity of their strategy now, i.e. ignore covid (or now overtly push for mass infections and herd immunity; Fauci is out, new guy in his place) and agitate and create mayhem to push the law and order theme.
That means Trump's advisors already know there is not the same amount of electoral slippage last time so they are not going to win by offering better policies or overtures to logic. Their conclusion is their only hope is to override logic and induce a high enough level of fear in the public in shake loose additional voters who for whatever reason actually believe they'd be safer under Trump.
I think this is going to backfire as more people may feel less safe under Trump and thus ensure any defections towards Trump could be matched by defections towards Biden. I think this strategy will yield zero net votes for Trump or even lose some. And with the hardened opinions of 2020 that does not allow for enough of a swing vote to re-elect him without cheating and attempting the martial law route.