MrDollarBills wrote:What metrics are you using to gauge how much better Jordan was over Allen during the course of the regular season? This notion that he was blowing Jarrett out of the water this season is revisionist...both of them had their ups and downs.
Hold on MDB, i never said he blew him out of the water. I said that he outplayed him to earn that spot. I dont dismiss that Jordan/Dinwiddie were vocal and maybe KD/Kyrie prefered he start. but the 2 months prior to the bubble Jordan outplayed him to earn that spot. it wasnt just gifted to him.
I'm not saying Jordan is better. I'm not saying Allen wont improve between now and next season to be better. I'm saying right now Jordan is as good or better and there should be no outrage if Jordan started over him next year, barring a massive improvement. I think you give the 2 a camp to battle it out.
The sample size is irrelevant. If Allen is bringing that kind of focus and consistency next season, 33 year old DeAndre Jordan, a player who didn't even bring a consistent effort in half of those 60 games, is not better than him at this point.
The sample size is mostly irrelevant. both due to be a really small sample (12 games) and a really odd scenario (mostly irrelevant bubble games with odd rosters after a huge layoff). What nakes those 12 bubble games a better sample than the prior 60 regular season games?
This thread will look really bad in about a season and a half when father time really starts kicking in.
It would be hard for me to look back and say it was a bad idea id we have upgraded levert or dinwiddie and jordan was center. Allen and centers in general are not all that important in todays game. You can get guys like Allen or 80% of him without giving up the farm