Fairview4Life wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
It is far more complex than that. When Russian hackers created fake BLM Facebook Groups and then created false flag rallies that Cambridge Analytica (Parscale, Kushner, Bannon, Mercers, Trump, etc.) then brought to the attention of targeted voters in order to arouse their anger, I'd say NOT doing anything to counter the weaponization of FB by foreign and internal enemies of fair elections is irresponsible. Sophisticated agents and coordinated disinfo campaigns abuse FB all the time. This is not just a matter of individuals expressing their opinions. FB is making profits off of those ads, thus they are more complicit than you're accounting for.
I don't disagree with that but since FB has proven that it cannot responsibly platform politics without it being weaponized, then it should lose that privilege. No more politics of any kind of FB. What's wrong with that?
The problem is that basically everything is politics.
You can definitely cut out political ads without getting hung up on the definition of what is a political thought or expression.
Apples and Oranges




















