The Corey's wrote:Why does the OG poster think that Simmons is the difference between the embarrassing sweep of the Sixers and winning it? Simmons is NOT a 4 game swing.
Not to mention the Celtics were without Gordon for 3 games them self.

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
The Corey's wrote:Why does the OG poster think that Simmons is the difference between the embarrassing sweep of the Sixers and winning it? Simmons is NOT a 4 game swing.
Not to mention the Celtics were without Gordon for 3 games them self.

RHODEY wrote:The Corey's wrote:Why does the OG poster think that Simmons is the difference between the embarrassing sweep of the Sixers and winning it? Simmons is NOT a 4 game swing.
Not to mention the Celtics were without Gordon for 3 games them self.
Yeah man.The Corey's wrote:RHODEY wrote:The Corey's wrote:Why does the OG poster think that Simmons is the difference between the embarrassing sweep of the Sixers and winning it? Simmons is NOT a 4 game swing.
Not to mention the Celtics were without Gordon for 3 games them self.
I dont understand the trolling but Im glad my season doesnt rest in that dudes hands.




The Corey's wrote:Why does the OG poster think that Simmons is the difference between the embarrassing sweep of the Sixers and winning it? Simmons is NOT a 4 game swing.
Not to mention the Celtics were without Gordon for 3 games them self.
Side beard wrote:The Corey's wrote:Why does the OG poster think that Simmons is the difference between the embarrassing sweep of the Sixers and winning it? Simmons is NOT a 4 game swing.
Not to mention the Celtics were without Gordon for 3 games them self.
This is like saying Clippers would still beat Dallas if they did not have Kawhi.
RHODEY wrote:Funny how the BSPN analysts couldn't see this coming .No interior defense... You lose Morris, Horford, and Baynes, replace that with Kanter and what did they expect?Instead of talking about the Celts being a top 4 Eastern team and whether Kemba could replace Kyrie , they needed to be asking if they can even make the playoffs as a "donut" team.

dorkestra wrote:Embiid is embarrassing the whole city of Philadelphia. Wake up you little bitch
The Comedian wrote:Saint Lazarus playing 4D chess right now.
This dude legit has other Celtics fans arguing with him

TheBallsDeeper wrote:Celtics are going to be in the race for the number one pick unless they make some big moves. Can't make the playoffs with no defense. They probably have the worse interia defense in the league, and a really poor defensive point guard. The only thing that can save them is their coach, but even Stevens can not preform miracles with this mess.

GiannisAnte34 wrote:themoneyteam2 wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:The Celtics are going to be matadors in the paint, going to get bodied every single night and it would be extremely tough as a fan to watch that routinely
Crazy they have the #4 defense in the league and have 3rd best defense in the paint with all those matadors!
and yet they'll still get knocked out in the 2nd round again
GeorgeMarcus wrote:macNcheese3 wrote:The Celtics aren't neccesarily better than last year. According to Ainge, Hayward is back to pre injury form. I find that hard to believe. Regardless, they make the playoffs, but I don't see them making any serious noise. Bound for a first or 2nd round exit at best.
They are necessarily worse. Horford was the most important piece to their success. Been that way for a few years. I like the Kemba fit a little better than the Kyrie fit, but the difference there is negligible.
Their best hope is for the young guys to take a significant next step.

RHODEY wrote:celtxman wrote:RHODEY wrote:
Uh this is the General board, why dont you go back to the Celts board and prepare for a 2nd round ousting.
Yeah Toronto is really tough. Good point. Who do you have in the 2nd round?
Toronto in 6.