Chicagoat wrote:MrFortune3 wrote:Jvaughn wrote:
If you're making the case that Coby will be outplayed by Hayes, and lose his starting spot, that's more reason to draft Hayes. I don't understand the logic of staying away from a player because he might be better than the current player on your roster. That's absurd.
Roster construction matters in the NBA more than people like to believe. The Sixers went BPA(well, on their board)regardless of position during the process and their roster is flawed. Charlotte has done the same thing and their roster is badly flawed. Phoenix has done it in the past. Orlando is currently still doing it.
At some point you have to draft for position or the glut catches up with you.
 
We have a glut of point guards yes, but almost none of those players are worth a damn in the grand scheme of things. Sato, Archie, Dunn(RFA), being disposable while White being the only PG with some future on this team. Roster construction does matter but when you have good talent that was acquired through the draft. You can just trade the excess position to fill out the roster if need be.
Besides we are still a young team. I wouldn't put too much stock on roster construction. Obviously it still a factor and we would need to fill out the roster so we could have a balanced roster so our young guys would not get restricted in playing like they normally would.
Our biggest issue is talent. if it wasn't we wouldn't have looked bad all of last year. I get injury was also a factor, But when we're all healthy early on in the season we were still losing to the likes of the Knicks, Cavs, and Hornets.
 
Yeah. I think roster construction is important from a development angle. I didn't think that buying a full-time PF & PG when Lauri and Coby made a whole lot of sense. Actually think that spending on a lower-tier backup for Otto or Zach would've made sense, because there is an established pecking order. Zach and Otto are obviously going to be better than whatever MLE or $15m FA you sign.
With Lauri and Coby, it was dangerous because Thad got benched despite (arguably) being a better player than Lauri, and Coby got benched by virtue of being a rookie despite being much more talented than Sato.
When drafting this high (#4), especially in an unclear draft, the fact is that you have a chance to draft an all-star. Two of the top-5 prospects are PGs, so you have to consider over-stacking the position and resolving it later. Fact is with 6 PGs, the Bulls still had arguably the worst PG rotation in the entire NBA.
You consider needs and personality in free agency; focus in on talent in the draft (all-star projection).
Everybody needs a playmaker who can score and defend. Even if you have a Giannis, Luka, Lebron ... it sure helps to have a second guy, even if they played a redundant position. Can you imagine the Bucks if Jabari never tore his ACL 2x and lived up to his potential/trajectory? Him and Giannis would be redundant PFs who handle the ball, with Giannis clearly being the better one, but I'm pretty sure they would've figured out a way to make it work (or traded Jabari for a way better return then letting him walk).
You've got 4 such guys (potentially) in this top-5. This draft projects a very low success rate. You're really just targeting that 1 guy who'll pan out from this crop. I'm sure Arturas is not worried about it conflicting with anybody else's position on this roster.