ClipsFanSince98 wrote:Dupp wrote:ClipsFanSince98 wrote:
Any time you're up 3-1 and up 16 in game 5 mid 3rd... and lose.. you choked. Their win odds that game were up to 98%. Then in game 6 they were 19 at the same point in the game and lost. Denver deserves a lot of credit for their gameplan and talent, but ANYONE who loses after being up 3-1 pretty much choked. You have rare instances where the team down 1-3 (such as Magic vs Pistons under Doc) is the much better team, and it's dumb luck or focus, but the Clippers were clearly a lot more talented.
The clippers aren’t more talented though...
The Clippers were considered stacked all year for a reason. They had 3x the net rating and SRS of Denver for a reason. They had the 6th man winner and runner up for a reason. There is literally nobody with sense that should argue Denver is more talented roster wise or on paper than the Clippers. Denver is much better coached, mentally tougher and guys stepped up.. but raw talent wise it's literally not a close comparison. Clippers got 95 ppg from 5 players.
To imply Denver was more talented and expected to win this seems like a dishonest angle to me. Bottom line is the Clippers should have won this series and failed miserably. Don't give them an out by saying Denver was more talented.
I didn’t expect nuggets to win and I thought clippers were way better and way more talented than they are. I was wrong but in hindsight I don’t really think the clips were clearly more talented. The top 2 for Denver I think are very clearly more talented than the clippers top 2.( kawhi vs joker is a debate though)
3 down though you can give it to the clippers. It’s not huge though. Their “ talent” was exaggerated. People expected Lou to get exposed in the playoffs and he did, Harrell is a midget, Beverly is the most overrated defender in the league and very average offensively.
I dunno maybe “talent” isn’t the right word but Denver’s roster construction is better and they had guys in roles that worked and those guys were able to fulfil their roles.
Clippers holes are glaring though and I’m not sure they would have beaten a healthy Dallas.
1) Coach - terrible
2) Leadership - terrible
3) experience - it played a factor. I think a lot of guys that weren’t kawhi thought it’d be easier than it is
4) front court - not very good or big
5) playmakers - where are they?
6) PGs fragile mind
They aren’t in a bad spot though. Some tinkering and they will compete for a title. People that thought they were clear favourites like myself were very wrong and undersells the importance of their holes. I though playmaking was a big issue but some of the other stuff I didn’t worry about.