Michael Jackson wrote:In fairness no one expected Jimmy’s stock to rise this high, except Jimmy Butler, but really the whole NBA has under rated him his whole career and he just keeps raising the bar. He is a real feel good story aside from the prima Donna stuff, but you can understand it because this guy has lack some skills but he has that winner gene. He backs up his prima Donna moves. Does anyone still think KAT is the better player?
I don't think we need to be fair here. Tip of the hat to Ice Man, and other recent posts -
It's not about knowing what he'd be at his apex. It's the fact that we already knew at the time he was clearly a top 15-20 player. Those don't grow on trees...and you need multiple players of that ilk, or above to compete for titles. Why get rid of him?
I'm for tanking in the rare transcendent drafts, but the idea of bottoming out as necessity is losing traction year after year when you look at what the Heat have done this year...how the Warriors were built through the draft w/o any top 5 picks (pre-Durant...and I'm not counting Bogut). To a lesser extent teams like the Pacers remain competitive. How teams like the Thunder remain relevant, and in a position to improve while losing superstars. How so many of the brightest prime/young stars aren't top 5 picks (e.g. - Kawhi, Giannis, Jokic, Murray, Bam, D. Mitchell, Gobert, etc.,etc.,etc.).
Trading Jimmy was done because he rubbed the outdated, way past their time FO the wrong way...and it was a terrible, horrendous choice.