Macwolf527 wrote:https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/259641/247-Sports-Analyst-Josh-Gershon-To-Join-Timberwolves
I still think this is one of the most interesting pickups of the offseason. I don't see how much more input Josh could provide on this 2020 draft class that is not already known. His hiring speaks more to future drafts, specifically 2021 and what could be the double draft of 2022. If you take into account that the Wolves have already dumped their 2021 draft picks to the Warriors in the Russell-Wiggins trade, it stands to reason that they are looking to pick up future draft picks by moving around in this draft.
The top three picks on this draft, in no particular order, bump right up against the three best players on our roster Towns-Russell-Beasley to Wiseman-Ball-Edwards. If there was ever a time to trade down in a draft for the Wolves, now is the year. For many of us, the goal when putting together trade packages, was to bring back an early lottery pick this year. My question to group is this. Is there a scenario where you would trade for a rotational player, that's not league superstar like Booker, Beal or Simmons, a late lottery pick this year and a future pick in 2021 or 2022 for the #1 pick this year. I'll toss a team out first just to get the conversation rolling.
There are two players that I really covet in this draft for the Wolves. Patrick Williams and Precious Achiuwa. I think we have a chance of getting precious at #17, but Patrick Williams will be long gone by then. The one team I would consider working a trade with for the #1 pick would be the Phoenix Suns for their 10th pick. They have young players that fit our timeline and I would be okay with trading for future picks, because I see them still in the late lottery to middle parts of the draft in 2021 and 2022.
I've toyed with the idea of 10th + Bridges + something else for #1. If you dont like the risk profile at the top of the draft, then taking bridges as a high level 3D role player similiar to Covington is interesting.
A problem is that the suns would have basically the same fit/need issues as we do with Wiseman, Ball or Edwards since they have Ayton, Rubio and Booker at those positions. Question how motivated they are to move up to 1.
If Pascucci et al can identify someone at the top that they believe will develop into a star, I think they should run with that regardless of need. You can sort out the rest later.