NO-KG-AI wrote:He doesn’t have anything like Luka’s skills.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Luka is a poor shooter from range, an inefficient volume usage shooter. 76% FT. I'm not sure why people think Luka is some great shooter.
Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831
NO-KG-AI wrote:He doesn’t have anything like Luka’s skills.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Luka is a poor shooter from range, an inefficient volume usage shooter. 76% FT. I'm not sure why people think Luka is some great shooter.
BlazersBroncos wrote:Luka is a poor shooter from range, an inefficient volume usage shooter. 76% FT. I'm not sure why people think Luka is some great shooter.
He has the form to improve, and alot of his 3PT shots are to keep the defense honest. He shoots 43% of his shots from 4 and 50% of them within 10 feet. Its absolutley necessary that he bombs from 3 to keep defenses from sagging off. He hits 60% within those 10 feet (75% at the rim, which is a generational rate).
LaMelo isnt in the same stratosphere when it comes to getting to the basket. Its literally not even comparable. So he is jacking up 3's at low efficiency not to open his driving up but just because he has poor shot selection IMO.
MemphisX wrote:BlazersBroncos wrote:Luka is a poor shooter from range, an inefficient volume usage shooter. 76% FT. I'm not sure why people think Luka is some great shooter.
He has the form to improve, and alot of his 3PT shots are to keep the defense honest. He shoots 43% of his shots from 4 and 50% of them within 10 feet. Its absolutley necessary that he bombs from 3 to keep defenses from sagging off. He hits 60% within those 10 feet (75% at the rim, which is a generational rate).
LaMelo isnt in the same stratosphere when it comes to getting to the basket. Its literally not even comparable. So he is jacking up 3's at low efficiency not to open his driving up but just because he has poor shot selection IMO.
I think the difference here is physical development. I think that is the outlier skill for Melo...strength. If he is able to get strong enough at 6'7ish and good with the ball, it changes who he is as a prospect. That is what makes Luka so different. He is a bull at such a young age and uses that strength as a functional part of his game on both ends.
JHTruth wrote:NO-KG-AI wrote:He doesn’t have anything like Luka’s skills.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Luka is a poor shooter from range, an inefficient volume usage shooter. 76% FT. I'm not sure why people think Luka is some great shooter.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
I'm reading alot of personal opinions and very little scouting. This thread makes it clear alot of yall hate the kid for no damn reason.
shotsquatch wrote:0.37 FG%, 0.25 3P%, 0.72 FT%
The kid cannot shoot. That's a problem. If he can get his head screwed on right he'll be a useful facilitator on the court, but his potential is limited by that hideous jumpshot.
Dunno what Lavar did to those poor kids.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Dude, Iverson might have the most explosive first step of all time, and is a transcendent athlete. LaMelo is slow motion compared to iverson. There style is nothing alike, even aesthetically, but definitely not in terms of being able to create in the half court. Iverson’s shot selection could be questioned, but he could get to the rim at will.